Genetic Testing Utilization: Discrepancies Between Somatic and Germline Results in Patients With Cancer Reviewed at the UW Health Precision Medicine Molecular Tumor Board.

PURPOSE: Somatic and germline testing are increasingly used to estimate risks for patients with cancer. Although both germline testing and somatic testing can identify genetic variants that could change a patient's care and eligible treatments, the aims of these tests and their technologies are fundamentally different and cannot be used interchangeably. This study examines the timing and results of somatic and germline genetic testing for patients with cancer at UW Health. METHODS: Eight hundred and seventy-seven participants underwent somatic genetic testing, which was reviewed by the Precision Medicine Molecular Tumor Board (PMMTB). Patients were diagnosed with cancers, including breast, colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic, or ovarian cancer, and met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for germline genetic testing. Germline testing details were collected by medical record review. RESULTS: The results of this study found that only 310 patients (35%) had germline evaluation before PMMTB review. The percent of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in actionable genes was 28%. Most germline variants were identified in the BRCA1 (26%) and BRCA2 (28%) genes. In total, 65% (54/83) of germline variants were detected with both germline testing and somatic testing; however, 35% (29/83) of germline variants were not identified on somatic results. These results demonstrate the importance of combination germline and somatic testing. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the differences in genetic testing types and demonstrates that conducting germline testing at earlier stages of diagnoses is necessary to identify potentially actionable and treatment-specific variants in patients with cancer.

Nine Successful Pregnancy Outcomes in a Woman With Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: The vascular form of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes occurs due to alterations in the COL3A1 gene. It has been associated with major vascular and hollow organ complications, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates with pregnancy. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a woman (gravida 9, para 9) diagnosed with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in her 70s after bowel rupture. Genetic testing revealed a null mutation in COL3A1 that is predicted to result in haploinsufficiency. Preceding diagnosis, she had 9 pregnancies with minimal complications. DISCUSSION: While no evidence-based guidelines for obstetric care in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome have been well-established, patients often are counseled and followed as high-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Null mutations resulting in haploinsufficiency likely have lower pregnancy risks than reported in the literature for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome overall. Thus, understanding the specific COL3A1 mutation may help optimize counseling regarding pregnancy and facilitate decision-making regarding management.

The impact of insurance on equitable access to non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPT): private insurance may not pay.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), is a prenatal screening test for chromosomal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13). While women under 35 years of age with no other risk factors are considered low risk for pregnancies with aneuploidy, most babies with aneuploidy are born to low-risk women. Across the USA, including Wisconsin, many private insurances do not cover initial NIPT for low-risk women, creating a potential financial burden that may limit patient selection of NIPT. Low-risk women with public insurance in Wisconsin are covered for NIPT. This pilot study determined if a difference exists in NIPT uptake based on insurance type in low-risk pregnant women in their first trimester. It also explored genetic counselor perspectives on how insurance coverage for NIPT is addressed with patients. Women with public insurance were 3.43 times more likely to have NIPT as an initial screen for aneuploidy than women with private insurance, indicating that insurance coverage may present a barrier to care. Additionally, analysis showed no evidence of different demographic variables interacting with another to impact outcome after allowing for insurance coverage (X214 = 14.301, p = 0.428). Our data also suggests that more genetic counselors would recommend NIPT to patients if insurance coverage was not a barrier and were more likely to discuss financial risks associated with NIPT when a patient had private insurance. We conclude that some women cannot choose one of the safest and most sensitive prenatal aneuploidy screening tests due to financial barriers put into place by the lack of insurance coverage.

Alternative option labeling impacts decision-making in noninvasive prenatal screening.

Prenatal genetic screening should be an informed, autonomous patient choice. Extrinsic factors which influence patient decision-making threaten the ethical basis of prenatal genetic screening. Prior research in the area of medical decision-making has identified that labeling may have unanticipated effects on patient perceptions and decision-making processes. This Internet-administered study explored the impact of option labeling on the noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) selections of US adults. A total of 1,062 participants were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and randomly assigned to one of three possible label sets reflecting provider-derived and industry-derived option labels used in prenatal screening. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed option labeling had a statistically significant impact on the NIPS selections of study participants (p = .0288). Outcomes of the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD) indicated option labels did not play a role in participant satisfaction with screening selection. The results of this study indicate a need for further evaluation of the impact NIPS option labeling has on patient screening decisions in real-world clinical interactions. Clinical providers and testing laboratories offering NIPS should give careful consideration to the option labels used with prenatal screening so as to minimize influence on patient screening selection and decision-making processes.

Perceived Changes to Obstetric Care and the Integration of Personal and Professional Life as a Pregnant Prenatal Genetic Counselor.

The impact of practicing as a prenatal genetic counselor while pregnant is unclear given the limited amount of published literature on this issue. To address this gap in knowledge, a total of 215 current and past prenatal genetic counselors provided insights regarding this personal yet professional juncture through completion of an online survey that allowed for both close-ended and open-ended responses. While participants agreed that experiencing pregnancy affected their perspectives and counseling in several ways, this paper focuses on one particular finding-that of the changes in their own obstetric care perceived by genetic counselors while working within the prenatal setting and being pregnant themselves. As a result of these changes, considerations about when to disclose a pregnancy to colleagues along with how to integrate personal and professional needs as a pregnant prenatal genetic counselor surfaced. Additional findings, practice implications, and research recommendations are discussed.

TBC1D24 genotype-phenotype correlation: Epilepsies and other neurologic features.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the phenotypic spectrum associated with mutations in TBC1D24. METHODS: We acquired new clinical, EEG, and neuroimaging data of 11 previously unreported and 37 published patients. TBC1D24 mutations, identified through various sequencing methods, can be found online (http://lovd.nl/TBC1D24). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (28 men, 20 women, average age 21 years) from 30 independent families. Eighteen patients (38%) had myoclonic epilepsies. The other patients carried diagnoses of focal (25%), multifocal (2%), generalized (4%), and unclassified epilepsy (6%), and early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (25%). Most patients had drug-resistant epilepsy. We detail EEG, neuroimaging, developmental, and cognitive features, treatment responsiveness, and physical examination. In silico evaluation revealed 7 different highly conserved motifs, with the most common pathogenic mutation located in the first. Neuronal outgrowth assays showed that some TBC1D24 mutations, associated with the most severe TBC1D24-associated disorders, are not necessarily the most disruptive to this gene function. CONCLUSIONS: TBC1D24-related epilepsy syndromes show marked phenotypic pleiotropy, with multisystem involvement and severity spectrum ranging from isolated deafness (not studied here), benign myoclonic epilepsy restricted to childhood with complete seizure control and normal intellect, to early-onset epileptic encephalopathy with severe developmental delay and early death. There is no distinct correlation with mutation type or location yet, but patterns are emerging. Given the phenotypic breadth observed, TBC1D24 mutation screening is indicated in a wide variety of epilepsies. A TBC1D24 consortium was formed to develop further research on this gene and its associated phenotypes.