A qualitative study of patient perspectives of health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer: comparison with disease-specific evaluation tools.

AIM: Little is known about the factors that patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) consider as important in shaping their health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and whether these are adequately represented by currently used HrQoL instruments. The aim of this study was to determine which areas of HrQoL are important to patients with CRC and to establish whether these areas are represented by validated questionnaires. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients who were undergoing treatment or follow up for potentially curable CRC. The areas of HrQoL that were important to the patients were identified from the interview data using a qualitative thematic framework analysis. These themes were then compared with the item content of two CRC-specific HrQoL questionnaires, FACT-C and QLQ-C30/CR38. RESULTS: The interviews identified 10 themes considered by patients to be important determinants of their HrQoL. These comprised control, normality, fatigue, uncertainty, information, emotional support, self-image, coping, symptoms and emotionally challenging events. Both HrQoL instruments contained questions that concerned some of the themes identified, but none of the FACT-C scales and only three from QLQ-C30/CR38 produced scores from which clinicians could identify problems in these areas. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing areas of concern for patients may assist clinicians in improving HrQoL outcomes. However, validated instruments currently used in CRC provide little information with regard to these areas.

Risk factors for fracture in a UK population: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Common clinical risk factors for fracture in older women have been identified. To date, most of these risk factors have not been confirmed in a UK population. AIM: To confirm the important risk factors for fracture in older women. DESIGN: Comprehensive cohort study (CCS) with a nested randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The CCS included 4292 women aged >70 years. We assessed potential risk factors for fracture, and followed-up participants for 24 months for incidence of non-vertebral fractures. RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) for predicting any non-vertebral fracture were: previous fracture, 2.67 (95%CI 2.10-3.40); a fall in the last 12 months, 2.06 (95%CI 1.63-2.59); and age (per year increase), 1.03 (95%CI 1.01-1.05). ORs for predicting hip fracture were: previous fracture, 2.31 (95%CI 1.31-4.08); low body weight (<58 kg), 2.20 (95%CI 1.28-3.77); maternal history of hip fracture, 1.68 (95%CI 0.85-3.31); a fall in the last 12 months, 2.92 (95%CI 1.70-5.01); and age (per year increase), 1.09 (95%CI 1.04-1.13). ORs for predicting wrist fracture were: previous fracture, 2.29 (95%CI 1.56-3.34); and a fall in the last 12 months, 1.60 (95%CI 1.10-2.31). Being a current smoker was not associated with an increase in risk, and was consistent across all fracture types. DISCUSSION: Older women with the clinical risk factors identified in this study should be investigated for osteoporosis or offered preventive treatment.

Improving the measurement of quality of life in older people: the York SF-12.

To assess whether changing the layout of the SF-12 affected item response rates, we tested two SF-12 formats in a quasi-randomized trial of women aged >or=70 years in two general practices in North Yorkshire. The modified version of the SF-12 ('York SF-12') converted the 'stem and leaf' format of some questions to individual items. We assessed the effect of the two types of questionnaires on item response rates. The difference in overall response rates to the two questionnaires (York SF-12 26.8%; SF-12 29.5%) was not statistically significant (95%CI -1.88% to 7.22%). However, the modified SF-12 had a statistically significantly lower item non-response rate of 8.5%, compared with the 26.6% of the SF-12 (95%CI 11.1%-25.1%). Chronbach's alpha reliability scores for the York SF-12 were also slightly better than for the older version. The York version of the SF-12 is an improvement on the original questionnaire. We recommend that the York SF-12 be used in preference to the SF-12 when surveying an older population.