Smad-interacting protein-1 and microRNA 200 family define a nitric oxide-dependent molecular circuitry involved in embryonic stem cell mesendoderm differentiation.

OBJECTIVE: Smad-interacting protein-1 (Sip1/ZEB2) is a transcriptional repressor of the telomerase reverse transcriptase catalytic subunit (Tert) and has recently been identified as a key regulator of embryonic cell fate with a phenotypic effect similar, in our opinion, to that reported for nitric oxide (NO). Remarkably, SIP1/ZEB2 is a known target of the microRNA 200 (miR-200) family. In this light, we postulated that Sip1/ZEB2 and the miR-200 family could play a role during the NO-dependent differentiation of mES. METHODS AND RESULTS: The results of the present study show that Sip1/ZEB2 expression is downregulated during the NO-dependent expression of mesendoderm and early cardiovascular precursor markers, including Flk1 and CXCR4 in mES. Coincidently, members of the miR-200 family, namely miR-429, -200a, -200b, and -200c, were transcriptionally induced in parallel to mouse Tert. This regulation occurred at the level of chromatin. Remarkably, miR-429/miR-200a overexpression or Sip1/ZEB2 knockdown by short hairpin RNA interference elicited a gene expression pattern similar to that of NO regardless of the presence of leukemia inhibitory factor. CONCLUSIONS: These results are the first demonstrating that the miR-200 family and Sip1/ZEB2 transcription factor are regulated by NO, indicating an unprecedented molecular circuitry important for telomerase regulation and early differentiation of mES.

Inhibition of PARP activity by PJ-34 leads to growth impairment and cell death associated with aberrant mitotic pattern and nucleolar actin accumulation in M14 melanoma cell line.

The capability of PARP activity inhibitors to prevent DNA damage recovery suggested the use of these drugs as chemo- and radio-sensitisers for cancer therapy. Our research, carried out on cultured human M14 melanoma cells, was aimed to examine if PJ-34, a potent PARP activity inhibitor of second generation, was per se able to affect the viability of these cancer cells without any DNA damaging agents. Using time-lapse videomicroscopy, we evidenced that 10 microM PJ-34 treatment induced severe mitotic defects leading to dramatic reduction of cell proliferation and to cell death. PJ-34 cytotoxic effect was further confirmed by analysis of cell viability and clonogenic assay. Absence of canonic apoptosis markers allowed us to exclude this kind of cell death. No single and/or double stranded DNA damage was evidenced. Immunofluorescence analysis showed an aberrant mitotic scenario in several cells and subsequent multinucleation suggesting an atypical way for cells to die: the mitotic catastrophe. The detection of aberrant accumulation of polymerised actin inside the nucleolus was noteworthy. Taken together, our results demonstrate that, targeting PARP activity by PJ-34, cancer cell survival is affected independently of DNA damage repair. Two findings are remarkable: (a) cisplatin concentration can be reduced by three quarters if it is followed by treatment with 10 microM PJ-34 for 24 h to obtain the same cytotoxic effect; (b) effects dependent on PJ-34 treatment are reversible. Our data suggest that, to reduce the harm done to non-tumour cells during chemotherapy with cisplatin, the latter could be coupled with PJ-34 treatment.