Utility of Cough Provocation Tests in Chronic Cough and Respiratory Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and Introduction of New Reference Ranges for the Capsaicin Test.

Cough provocation tests (CPTs) are an objective measurement of the sensitivity of the cough reflex arc. However, they are not established in clinical practice because a large variability of response in healthy subjects limits their diagnostic value. There is a paucity of studies that have investigated CPT reference ranges in healthy subjects. This systematic review describes the variability of the responses to CPTs in healthy subjects and factors that influence it. A new analysis of 134 healthy subjects was conducted to create reference ranges for single-breath capsaicin CPT by calculating the interquartile ranges for the provocative concentration of capsaicin to induce 2 and 5 coughs. Female subjects had a more sensitive cough reflex than male counterparts. The ability of CPTs to distinguish various respiratory diseases from healthy subjects was also reviewed. Cough sensitivity was consistently heightened in the following groups: unselected patients with chronic, refractory, or recurrent cough, unexplained chronic cough, gastro-esophageal reflux-associated cough, cough-variant asthma, lower airway symptoms induced by chemical irritants, and fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. In the following groups, hypersensitivity of the cough reflex was present in those individuals whose symptom profile was predominated by cough: asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, and sarcoidosis. In the following conditions, patients usually cough in order to expectorate mucus from their airways, not because of a hypersensitive cough reflex arc: productive cough, asthma, upper airway cough syndrome, COPD, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, and chronic respiratory infections. CPTs have the potential to identify patients with chronic respiratory symptoms due to cough reflex hypersensitivity, thereby providing a targeted approach for therapy.

Accuracy of portable devices in measuring peak cough flow.

Peak cough flow (PCF) measurements can be used as indicators of cough effectiveness. Portable peak flow meters and spirometers have been used to measure PCF, but little is known about their accuracy compared to pneumotachograph systems. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of four portable devices (Mini-Wright and Assess peak flow meters, SpiroUSB and Microlab spirometers) in measuring PCF with a calibrated laboratory based pneumotachograph system. Twenty healthy volunteers (mean (SD) age 45 (16) years) coughed through a pneumotachograph connected in series with each portable device in turn, and the differences in PCF readings were analysed. In addition, mechanically generated flow waves of constant peak flow were delivered through each device both independently and when connected in series with the pneumotachograph. Agreement between PCF readings obtained with the pneumotachograph and the portable devices was poor. Peak flow readings were on average lower by approximately 50 L min(-1) when measured using the portable devices; 95% limits of agreement spanned approximately 150 L min(-1). The findings highlight the potential for inaccuracy when using portable devices for the measurement of PCF. Depending on the measurement instrument used, absolute values of PCF reported in the literature may not be directly comparable.

Does respiratory muscle training improve cough flow in acute stroke? Pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cough protects the lungs from aspiration. We investigated whether respiratory muscle training may improve respiratory muscle and cough function, and potentially reduce pneumonia risk in acute stroke. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in 82 patients with stroke (mean age, 64±14 years; 49 men) within 2 weeks of stroke onset. Participants were masked to treatment allocation and randomized to 4 weeks of daily expiratory (n=27), inspiratory (n=26), or sham training (n=25), using threshold resistance devices. Primary outcome was the change in peak expiratory cough flow of maximal voluntary cough. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline prognostic covariates. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in the mean maximal inspiratory (14 cmH2O; P<0.0001) and expiratory (15 cmH2O; P<0.0001) mouth pressure and peak expiratory cough flow of voluntary cough (74 L/min; P=0.0002) between baseline and 28 days in all groups. Peak expiratory cough flow of capsaicin-induced reflex cough was unchanged. There were no between-group differences that could be attributed to respiratory muscle training. There were also no differences in the 90-day incidence of pneumonia between the groups (P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory muscle function and cough flow improve with time after acute stroke. Additional inspiratory or expiratory respiratory muscle training does not augment or expedite this improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN40298220.