Efficacy and safety of intracoronary epinephrine versus conventional treatments alone in STEMI patients with refractory coronary no-reflow during primary PCI: The RESTORE observational study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare intracoronary (IC) epinephrine versus conventional treatments alone in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and refractory coronary no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with severe refractory coronary no-reflow (TIMI 0-1, MBG 0-1) during PPCI were prospectively included after initial failure of conventional treatments. Conventional treatments used in both groups included IC nitrates, thrombectomy. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and adenosine. Patients received IC epinephrine or no epinephrine. RESULTS: Intracoronary administration of epinephrine yielded significantly better coronary flow patterns (28.6% TIMI 3, 64.3% TIMI 2, 7.1% TIMI 1, and 0% TIMI 0), compared to those after treatment with conventional agents alone (18.8% TIMI 3, 12.5% TIMI 2, 37.5% TIMI 1, and 31.3% TIMI 0) (p value between groups = .004). In the IC epinephrine vs. no epinephrine group there was a significant reduction of 30-day composite of death or heart failure (35.7% vs. 81.25%), improvement of ejection fraction (p = .01) and ST-segment resolution (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this proof-of-concept study suggest that as compared to use of conventional agents alone, IC epinephrine provides substantial improvement of coronary flow in STEMI patients with refractory no-reflow during PPCI that may result into improved prognosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Role of prognostic markers and relationship with genetic analysis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is increasingly recognized as an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI). Currently there is little knowledge about prognostic factors for unfavorable outcome at long term follow-up; furthermore, there is also little knowledge about the genetics of these patients. AIMS: This observational and retrospective study describes long-term cardiovascular outcomes of a population affected by SCAD and assesses predictors of recurrent de novo SCAD and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Furthermore, a correlation between genotype and adverse events at follow-up was sought. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, angiographic features, use of medication and long-term cardiovascular events were systematically ascertained between 2000 and 2019. Next generation sequencing was performed with a panel consisting of twenty genes of interest. Variants found were filtered based on their frequency and only frequencies <1% in the general population were considered as "positive". RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled and followed for a median time of 39.1 months. Median age was 52 years and the majority were women (86%). Use of hormone therapy (HT) (OR 3.64, p = 0.041) and presence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) at onset (OR 7.03, p = 0.0073) were associated with a greater risk of recurrent de novo SCAD. Proximal type SCAD (OR 8.47, p < 0.0001) and presence of VAs at onset (OR 9.97, p = 0.047) were associated with a greater risk of MACE. A potential SCAD-associated mutation was detected in 27 patients (44%); 6 patients (22%) defined as genetically "positive" developed MACE vs. 2 patients (6%) defined as "negative" (p = 0.06 at univariate analysis). MACE at follow-up is reached earlier in genetically positive patients (7.9 vs. 42.5 months). CONCLUSION: use of HT and VAs at SCAD onset are prognostic factors for recurrent de novo SCAD. Proximal SCAD site and VAs at SCAD onset were prognostic factors for MACE. Analysis by molecular genetics seems to be a promising tool for the possible additional role it could play in MACE prediction.

Clinical performance of a dedicated self-apposing stent for the treatment of left main stem disease. Results of the left Main AngioplasTy wIth a Self-apposing StEnt - the MATISSE study.

BACKGROUND: In the recent years percutaneous treatment of the left main stem (LM) has gained a precise role as a result of consistent scientific evidence vs. coronary artery bypass. A self-apposing stent offers an improved adaptation to the vessel wall, especially in case of tapered vessels; aim of this study was to investigate the role of a novel self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting stent (Stentys, France) for the treatment of LM coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: MATISSE is a retrospective, multicenter registry, which enrolled 151 patients treated with the device at 17 international centers. Primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target-vessel myocardial infarction, at 9months clinical follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural success, the single determinants of MACE and stent thrombosis. Lesions were located in distal LM bifurcation in 84% of the patients. Procedural success was achieved in 150 patients. The average follow-up length was 348±52days. MACE occurred in 14 (9.3%) patients with 2 (1.3%) cardiac deaths. TLR occurred in 8 patients (5.3%). There were 2 cases of definite stent thrombosis, 1 acute and 1 very late. CONCLUSIONS: A self-apposing stent, when used for LM PCI in a real world, high risk population, showed good immediate procedural results with low rates of adverse events at mid-term follow-up.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerative aortic valve regurgitation long after heart transplantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a feasible therapeutic option for the management of high-risk patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis. Recently it has been extended to high-risk patients with severe aortic regurgitation. Degenerative aortic valve disease is generally uncommon in heart transplant recipients. We report the case of a 75-year-old man in whom severe degenerative aortic regurgitation developed 14 years after heart transplantation (HTx). Because of multiple comorbidities and high surgical risk, TAVI was preferred. A 29-mm CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) was successfully implanted using a transfemoral approach.

Stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions: long-term follow-up and predictors of outcome.

AIMS: To compare the outcomes of drug-eluting (DES) vs. bare-metal (BMS) stents for stenting of native aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) and to identify predictors of major adverse cardio and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 181 patients (182 AOL) who underwent stenting of AOL were retrospectively identified: right-coronary artery in 130 (71.4%), left main in 52 (28.6%). In-hospital event rate was 1.1% (two non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions). Follow-up was possible in 98.3%, median time=23.9 months (IQR 12.1-37.7). Event rates and survival MACCE-free were not significantly different between DES and BMS. After multivariate analysis, only the logistic EuroSCORE >10% predicted MACCE (HR=4.66, 95% CI: 2.38-9.12, p<0.001), whereas the predictors for TLR were age (HR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00, p=0.039) and the stented artery (RCA vs. LM, HR=10.2, 95% CI: 1.37-75.45, p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: AOL stenting can be performed with high success and low complication rates. At follow-up, no significant differences in event rates were found between DES and BMS; EuroSCORE>10% was the only predictor of MACCE.

Long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation in unselected population: ROME and UDINE experience (the RUDI registry).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES implantation in an unselected, "real world," high-risk population. BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials showed that drug-eluting stents (DESs) implantation is safe and effective in selected population. In spite of these encouraging results, there are some concerns about "real world" utilization of these stents. METHODS: One thousand four hundred and fifty-five off-label patients have been included in our registry. Primary end-points were: long-term clinical incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and thrombosis (ST). We detected the difference between uniDES vs. multiDES implantation in terms of MACCE, death, nonfatal-MI, the composite of death/nonfatal-MI and target lesion revascularization (TLR) and the difference between DES type in term of MACCE. RESULTS: At 36 months follow-up we found: cardiac death occurred in 20 patients (1.6%); 33 patients (2.6%) had a nonfatal MI and 81 patients (6.3%) had a TLR. We observed one (0.1%) acute, 9 subacute (0.6%), 6 late (0.6%), and 1 (0.5%) very late definite ST. No difference were found in terms of overall MACCE, MI, death and composite of death/nonfatal-MI between uni- and multiDES implantation but multiDES group had a higher incidence of TLR. No difference between DES type in term of MACCE was detected. CONCLUSIONS: DES utilization shows their safety and efficacy in off-label patients with complex clinical and angiographic profile in terms of long-term incidence of MACCE. MultiDES implantation is associated with a higher risk of long-term TLR. No difference between DES type was found.