Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform ; 94(2): 74-78, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a major problem in aviation medicine because it is responsible for sleepiness and high cardiovascular risk, which could jeopardize flight safety. Residual sleepiness after the treatment is not a rare phenomenon and its management is not homogenous in aviation medicine. Thus, we decided to perform a study to describe this management and propose guidelines with the help of the literature.METHODS: This is a retrospective study including all aircrew members with a history of OSAS who visited our aeromedical center between 2011 and 2018. Residual sleepiness assessment was particularly studied.RESULTS: Our population was composed of 138 aircrew members (mean age 50.1 ± 9.6 yr, 76.8% civilians, 80.4% pilots); 65.4% of them had a severe OSAS with a mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at 8.5 ± 4.7 and a mean apnea hypopnea index of 36.2 ± 19.2/h. Of our population, 59.4% performed maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) and 10.1% had a residual excessive sleepiness. After the evaluation, 83.1% of our population was fit to fly.DISCUSSION: An evaluation of treatment efficiency is required in aircrew members with OSAS. Furthermore, it is important to have an objective proof of the absence of sleepiness. In this case, ESS is not sufficient and further evaluation is necessary. Many tests exist, but MWT are generally performed and the definition of a normal result in aeronautics is important. This evaluation should not be reserved to solo pilots only.Monin J, Rebiere E, Guiu G, Bisconte S, Perrier E, Manen O. Residual sleepiness risk in aircrew members with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(2):74-78.


Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Wakefulness , Sleepiness , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/etiology
2.
Sleep Med ; 100: 183-189, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: /objectives: Sleep disorders are a critical issue for flight safety. Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of sleep disorders and excessive sleepiness in the general population and some aircrews. The objectives of this study are to measure the prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep disorders in aircrews, and to determine the risk factors of falling asleep during a flight. METHODS: this is a monocentric study based on questionnaires, including all professional civilian and military aircrews examined in an aeromedical center between January and May 2021. The questionnaire, created for this study, included information about socio-demographic characteristics, aeronautical experience, lifestyle, sleep habits, an Epworth sleepiness scale, and screening tests for chronic insomnia, sleep apnea syndrome and restless legs syndrome. RESULTS: 749 aircrew members were included (86.2% male, 58.9% civilian, 74.1% pilot, mean age 43.4 ± 9.6 years), 45.9% of the population had at least one sleep disorder (chronic insomnia 39.5%, sleep apnea syndrome 10.5%, restless legs syndrome 4.1%), 15.5% had an excessive daytime sleepiness, and 24.6% reported in-flight sleep while on duty. Chronic insomnia, screen use before bedtime, use of sleeping pills, inadequate recovery time after a flight, female gender and civilian status were found as risk factors of in-flight sleep in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: this study emphasizes the need to improve the screening and prevention of sleep disorders in this particular population.


Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Restless Legs Syndrome , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Restless Legs Syndrome/epidemiology , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/complications , Prevalence , Sleepiness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sleep Wake Disorders/complications , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/etiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 21(5): 479-85, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26681126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for the interpretation of electrocardiogram have been published in 2009. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICoDs) in a large population, using these recommendations. METHODS: From 01/31/1996 to 09/22/2010, an electrocardiogram was performed at each visit for all aircrew members examined for fitness assessment in an aeromedical center. The prevalence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), incomplete LBBB, incomplete RBBB, nonspecific intraventricular disturbance (NIVCD), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), and left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) was measured and compared by age and gender. RESULTS: The global prevalence of ICoD was 3.09% in our population of 69,186 patients. The most frequent types of ventricular blocks were IRBBB (1.25%) and LAFB (1.10%), whereas RBBB (0.46%), LBBB (0.08%), ILBBB (0.03%), NIVCD (0.05%), and LPFB (0.13%) were rare findings. ICoDs are more frequent for males and older age groups (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our results are comparable to studies concerning low cardiovascular risks populations. The association between ICoD and cardiovascular diseases needs to be studied in this population.


Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aviation , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
4.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 85(1): 66-70, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24479262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During an aircraft ejection, the pilot is exposed to accelerations to the point of human tolerance, which may cause spinal injuries. Many nations have reported a spinal trauma rate of about 20-30%, with plain radiography as the first-line exam. Insofar as ejection seats and diagnostic imaging have improved, the objectives of this study are to describe the spine injuries among recently ejected French aircrew, to analyze the spinal imaging used, and, if necessary, to propose a better standardized radiological procedure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included all aircrews of the French forces who ejected from 2000 to 2008, with an authorized access to the technical reports of the investigations. RESULTS: There were 36 ejections collected, 75% with an MK-10 seat and an arrival on dry land. All pilots were alive, but 42% of them sustained 24 spinal fractures, most of the time with a simple compression of the thoracic segment, but also 4 ligamentous or discal lesions. Computed tomography or RMI was used in 64% of cases and four fractures were missed or underestimated on X-ray. One complex fracture required surgical treatment. A return to flying duties was frequently possible within a period of 6 mo. CONCLUSIONS: New generation ejection seats remain highly traumatic for the spine. It is recommended that all ejected aircrews be assessed with computed tomography to improve the sensitivity of the screening for fractures. The risk of asymptomatic lesions makes necessary the systematic use of a stretcher for initial evacuation when possible.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Aviation , Aircraft , Military Personnel , Spinal Injuries/etiology , Adult , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Injuries/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...