ABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, chronic autoimmune disease with symptoms of fluctuating muscular weakness and fatigability. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of MG in Germany, and to understand the burden of disease and treatment patterns, based on anonymized German claims data. Two patient samples were identified: (1) incident MG patients with newly onset disease between 2015 and 2019, and (2) prevalent MG patients in 2019. In total, 775 incident MG patients with a mean age of 66.9 years; and 1,247 prevalent MG patients with a mean age of 68.6 years were included. The prevalence for Germany was estimated to be 39.3/100,000 on 31/12/2019; the incidence in 2019 was 4.6 cases/100,000 persons. The 12-month mortality was 5.7. For 31.5% of the incident patients, no MG treatment was observed in the first year after the index date. Of all incident patients, 29.9% experienced an exacerbation, and 6.7% a myasthenic crisis during the observation. Our study indicates that a substantial proportion of MG patients remains untreated. Many MG patients still experience exacerbations / MG crises. MG seems to be associated with an excess mortality in comparison to the general non-MG population.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Incidence , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This prospective noninterventional study assessed the contraceptive efficacy, safety and the effects on signs of androgenization of the generic oral contraceptive containing 2 mg chlormadinone acetate/0.03 mg ethinylestradiol (CMA/EE) in a real-world setting. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1440 women were investigated during a six-cycle period by 229 gynecological practices throughout Germany. RESULTS: The adjusted Pearl index was 0.136 (unadjusted: 0.271). Of 463 patients with cycle irregularities at baseline, 83.4% had regular cycles after six cycles. Likewise, 74.1% of 162 patients with spotting or breakthrough bleeding at baseline were free from these symptoms at the end of study. The percentage of patients with dysmenorrhea decreased significantly from baseline (36.5%) to visit 3 after six cycles (12.3%; p=.0001), with a significant reduction in the use of pain medication (p<.0001). Additionally, the number of patients with skin and hair problems was significantly reduced (skin: 56.3% at baseline, 19.6% after six cycles; hair: 45.7% at baseline, 13.4% after six cycles; p=.001). CMA/EE was well tolerated by the patients, and 89.44% of the gynecologists were satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSION: Generic CMA/EE exhibits very good contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and dysmenorrhea reduction. Furthermore, treatment with generic CMA/EE led to a favorable reduction of skin and hair problems in our study.