Prioritization of patients for comprehensive medication review by a clinical pharmacist in family medicine.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study describes and evaluates the clinical pharmacy priority (CP2) score. We hypothesize that patients with high CP2 scores are more likely to receive a medication recommendation after comprehensive medication review (CMR) than patients with lower scores. Prioritization of patients for CMR by a clinical pharmacist in family medicine could enhance the provision of interprofessional care within the patient-centered medical home. METHODS: The CP2 score was developed collaboratively by the research team and is derived from 11 patient-specific factors extracted from the electronic health record. To evaluate the utility of the score, CMR was performed prospectively by a clinical pharmacist for patients with appointments between October 1 and December 31, 2012, at 2 University of Colorado family medicine clinics. RESULTS: CMR was performed for 1107 patient appointments. Of these, 101 were identified as having received a medication recommendation from the clinical pharmacist. For patients with a CP2 score of 0 to 2, 2 of 588 charts (0.3%) reviewed received a recommendation (level 1). The proportion increased to 37 of 358 (10.3%) for scores of 3 to 7 (level 2), 40 of 119 (33.6%) for scores of 8 to 10 (level 3), and 22 of 42 (52.4%) for scores of ≥11 (level 4). Compared with CP2 scores in level 1, patient appointments were more likely to receive a medication recommendation after CMR in level 2 (relative risk [RR], 30.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-125.3), in level 3 (RR, 98.8; 95% CI, 24.2-403.3), and in level 4 (RR, 154; 95% CI, 37.5-632.8). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher CP2 scores were more likely to receive a medication recommendation after CMR by a clinical pharmacist than patients with lower scores. The CP2 score could be used by clinical pharmacists in family medicine to enhance the efficient and effective delivery of interprofessional care.

An off-site clinical pharmacy service in family medicine: development and 1-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical pharmacists are a part of integrated health care teams and provide clinical medication recommendations for family physicians. On-site clinical pharmacy services are common in family medicine. This model may not be the most effective or efficient way to provide clinical pharmacy services in a small practice or in a remote location. The objectives of this study were to describe the development of an off-site clinical pharmacy service and to describe the 1-year clinical impact of this service. METHODS: The University of Colorado Park Meadows Family Medicine Clinic is located approximately 15 miles from the Anschutz Medical Campus. In July 2011, a clinical pharmacist implemented clinical pharmacy services with the goal of providing medication expertise primarily using an off-site model. The clinical pharmacist prospectively screened patients with appointments and provided medication recommendations in the electronic medical record for providers to consider at the patient appointment. RESULTS: For the first 12 months, the clinical pharmacist spent 118 hours providing the clinical pharmacy service. A total of 315 medication recommendations were made for 123 patients; 69.8% were implemented. Forty-nine vaccinations were administered, and 24 potentially dangerous major drug-drug interactions were identified and resolved. Thirty-one unnecessary high-cost drugs were discontinued, resulting in estimated annual savings of $52,215.36. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that clinical pharmacy services can be implemented for smaller remote family clinics using an offsite model. Within this model, clinical pharmacy interventions optimized medication use, managed serious drug interactions, and resulted in cost avoidance.