Infrared Thermography as a Diagnostic Tool for the Assessment of Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing Infrafemoral Endovascular Revascularisations.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and reliability of temperature foot changes measured by infrared thermography (IRT) for the evaluation of patients with atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) before and after endovascular revascularisation. METHODS: This is an observational prospective study carried out on symptomatic PAD patients. Evaluations consisted of a clinical examination, duplex scan with ankle-brachial index calculation (ABI) and IRT measurements with infrared camera FLIR-ONE connected to a smartphone with android technology. Locations on the foot sampled with IRT were the anterior tibial, pedal, posterior and arcuate arteries. Results obtained with IRT on the symptomatic foot were compared to the contralateral foot and with the ABI values obtained bilaterally before and 24 h after revascularisation. RESULTS: Within one year, 40 patients were enrolled, among whom 87,5% suffered from critical limb ischaemia. In three patients, it was impossible to obtain ABI measurements because of ulcerations on the limb. Skin temperature changes obtained by IRT between the symptomatic limb and the contralateral limb had a mean difference of 1.7 °C (range: 1.1-2.2 °C), p < 0.001. There was a positive correlation between ABI and temperature values of the limb needed for treatment before revascularisation (p = 0.025; r = 0.36) and after revascularisation (p = 0.024, r = 0.31). The technical success rate was 100% in all cases, achieving a significant increase in temperature at all points of the foot analysed, with a median change of 2 °C (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IRT is a safe, reliable and simple application. It could be a valuable tool for the assessment of the clinical presentation and severity of foot blood perfusion in symptomatic PAD patients and the evaluation of the technical success of endovascular revascularisation. IRT might have a role in follow-up of revascularisation procedures.

Incidence, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of True Superficial Artery Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: True superficial femoral artery aneurysms (SFAAs) do not occur frequently but carry a high risk of limb loss when they are complicated with thrombosis, distal embolization or rupture. Large aneurysms can also exert a mass effect, compressing adjacent veins and nerves. We performed an updated review of the literature with regard to their incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes over the years. METHODS: A MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) search of papers reporting SFAAs was conducted. Studies reported in the literature were considered for the review regardless of their nature and the number of participants. The available data regarding patient demographics, method of diagnosis, size, location, clinical presentation, therapy, and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Searching from 1967 to the present, we identified 59 papers reporting true SFAAs. Forty-one papers were case reports with 1 case each, 9 papers with 2 cases each and 9 papers reporting case series with more than 3 cases. There was 1 study reporting data on the management of asymptomatic SFAAs. We identified 164 SFA aneurysms, and 84.4% were symptomatic. The mean age of patients at the presentation was 70.2 years (range, 27-96) and 89.4% were men. SFAAs were diagnosed earlier in patients with connective tissue disorders, with a mean age of 35 years (range, 29-43). In 60.2 % of cases are present symptoms related to mass compression, 26,8% with rupture, and 27,3% of cases with ischemic symptoms. Endovascular approach was chosen in 52.6% of SFAAs reported in the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The data in the available literature are poor regarding the management of asymptomatic aneurysms, and the conclusions are based mainly on the symptomatic aneurysms reported. Most SFAAs present mainly with symptoms due to mass compression and rupture rather than ischemic symptoms. The endovascular approach is becoming more popular and could become the preferred choice.

A systematic review of contralateral carotid stenosis progression after carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Progression of contralateral carotid artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been described by several authors. The aim of this study is to determine such disease progression and its related transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or strokes by reviewing the existing literature. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review to select randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting outcomes of patients treated by CEA and with concomitant contralateral carotid stenosis, regardless its degree of stenosis. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019127595). The primary study end point was the progression of contralateral carotid artery stenosis after CEA, and the secondary end point was incidence of TIAs and strokes owing to contralateral carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were retrieved, reporting data on a total of 7679 patients who had undergone CEA, in particular they were one post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, nine prospective, and seven retrospective observational studies. Among these patients, follow-up information on the contralateral carotid artery was available for 5454 cases. Disease progression was observed in 18% of patients: single class progression from mild (<50%) and from moderate (50%-70%) stenosis was observed in 15% and 23% of cases, respectively. We found 105 TIAs (4%) and 88 strokes (3%) among 2781 patients with stenosis progression, based on result from 11 studies. CONCLUSIONS: We found a progression of contralateral carotid stenosis in a significant number of patients treated with CEA and with baseline carotid stenosis. This systematic literature review suggests that patients with moderate contralateral carotid stenosis demonstrate more rapid progression to significant or symptomatic stenosis than patients with mild contralateral stenosis.