Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Affect Disord ; 238: 79-86, 2018 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29864713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identifying bipolar patients in the first phases of the illness is essential to establish adequate treatment. The goal of this study was to examine the discriminant ability of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) in recognizing bipolar patients referred to a tertiary care structure. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, we assessed 843 individuals referred to the Mood Disorders Program by family physicians in the community. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID) was used to assess diagnoses. A nurse collected the information about lifetime symptoms of (hypo)mania in 759 individuals using the MDQ. Univariate chi-square test and logistic regression were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 86% of the sample had a current anxiety or depressive disorder. When compared to the diagnoses formulated through the SCID, the sensitivity of the MDQ was 75.0%, the specificity was 74%, the positive predictive value was 55%, and the negative predictive value was 88%. Among non-bipolar patients, current post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, current or early remission substance use disorder, and the history of childhood abuse were independently associated with false positive screening using the MDQ. LIMITATIONS: Individuals with current substance use disorders were under-represented, whether or not the patients were aware of their diagnosis of bipolar disorder was not recorded, and the history of childhood abuse was collected based on an open interview. CONCLUSIONS: The self-rated measure of the symptoms listed by the MDQ seems to measure a dimension shared by both bipolar disorder and other conditions characterized by affective instability and impulsivity.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , False Positive Reactions , Interview, Psychological/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 113, 2017 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28351403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The course of depression is poorer in clinical settings than in the general population. Several predictors have been studied and there is growing evidence that a history of childhood maltreatment consistently predicts a poorer course of depression. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012, we assessed 238 individuals suffering from a current episode of major depression. Fifty percent of these (N = 119) participated in a follow-up study conducted between 2012 and 2014 that assessed sociodemographic and clinical variables, the history of childhood abuse and neglect (using the Adverse Childhood Experience questionnaire), and the course of depression between baseline and follow-up interview (using the Life Chart method). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR was used to assess diagnosis at baseline and follow-up interview. Statistical analyses used the life table survival method and Cox proportional hazard regression tests. RESULTS: Among 119 participants, 45.4% did not recover or remit during the follow-up period. The median time to remission or recovery was 28.9 months and the median time to the first recurrence was 25.7 months. Not being married, a chronic index depressive episode, comorbidity with an anxiety disorder, and a childhood history of physical neglect independently predicted a slower time to remission or recovery. The presence of three or more previous depression episodes and a childhood history of emotional neglect were independent predictors of depressive recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood emotional and physical neglect predict a less favorable course of depression. The effect of childhood neglect on the course of depression was independent of sociodemographic and clinical variables.


Subject(s)
Adult Survivors of Child Abuse/psychology , Child Abuse/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Child , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors
3.
Biol Psychol ; 94(3): 545-55, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24056129

ABSTRACT

Comorbidity between depression and tobacco use may reflect self-medication of serotonergically mediated mood dysregulation, which has been associated with aberrant cortical activation and hemispheric asymmetry in patients with major depressive disorders (MDD). This randomized, double-blind study in 28 remitted MDD patients examined the moderating effects of acute nicotine and smoker vs. nonsmoker status on mood and EEG changes accompanying transient reductions in serotonin induced by acute tryptophan depletion (ATD). In smokers, who exhibited greater posterior high alpha power and increased left frontal low alpha power (signs of deactivation) compared to nonsmokers, ATD increased self-ratings of depressed mood and elevated left frontal and right parietal high alpha power (i.e. further cortical deactivation). Smokers were not affected by nicotine administration. In nonsmokers, ATD did not influence depression ratings, but it reduced vigor ratings and increased frontal and posterior theta power; both of which were blocked by acute nicotine. These findings indicate a role for nicotinic receptors in disordered mood.


Subject(s)
Affect/drug effects , Brain/drug effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Nicotine/pharmacology , Smoking/psychology , Tryptophan/metabolism , Adult , Affect/physiology , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Serotonin/metabolism , Smoking/physiopathology
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 13: 211, 2013 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many new approaches have been adopted for the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) in the past few years, which strived to produce more positive outcomes. To enhance the quality of care, several guideline recommendations have been developed. For study purposes, we monitored the prescription of psychotropic drugs administered to bipolar patients who had been referred to tertiary care services, and assessed the degree to which treatment met specific guidelines. METHODS: Between December 2006 and February 2009, we assessed 113 individuals suffering from BD who had been referred to the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (ROMHC) Mood Disorders Program by physicians within the community, mostly general practitioners. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR was used to assess diagnosis. The prescribed treatment was compared with specific Canadian guidelines (CANMAT, 2009). Univariate analyses and logistic regression were used to assess the contribution of demographic and clinical factors for concordance of treatment with guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects had BD type I (BD-I), and 81 subjects had BD type II (BD-II). All subjects with BD-I, and 90% of the BD-II group were given at least one psychotropic treatment. Lithium was more often prescribed for subjects with BD-I (62%) than those with BD-II (19%). Antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed class of psychotropics. Sixty-eight percent of subjects received treatment concordant with guidelines by medication and dose. The presence of a current hypomanic episode was independently associated with poorer concordance to guidelines. In more than half the cases, the inappropriate use of antidepressants was at the origin of the non concordance of treatment with respect to guidelines. Absence of psychotropic treatment in bipolar II patients and inadequate dosage of mood stabilizers were the two other main causes of non concordance with guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The factors related to treatment not concordant with guidelines should be further explored to determine appropriate strategies in implementing the use of guidelines in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence , Lithium/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Tertiary Healthcare
5.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 15(3): 193-201, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22526405

ABSTRACT

Infertility is strongly associated with depression, yet treatment research for depressed infertile women is sparse. This study tested for the first time the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), the evidence-based antidepressant intervention with the greatest peripartum research support, as treatment for depressed women facing fertility problems. Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder of at least moderate severity were randomized to either 12 sessions of IPT (n = 15) or brief supportive psychotherapy (BSP; n = 16), our control intervention. Eighty percent of IPT and 63 % of BSP patients completed the 12 sessions of therapy. Patients in both treatments improved. IPT produced a greater response rate than BSP, with more than two-thirds of women achieving a >50 % reduction in scores on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). IPT also tended to have lower posttreatment scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale, and anxiety subscale of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, with between-group effect sizes ranging from 0.61 to 0.76. Gains persisted at 6-month follow-up. This pilot trial suggests that IPT is a promising treatment for depression in the context of infertility and that it may fare better than a rigorous active control condition. Should subsequent randomized controlled trials support these findings, this will inform clinical practice and take an important step in assuring optimal care for depressed women struggling with infertility.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Infertility, Female/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Mothers/psychology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Psychotherapy, Brief/methods , Adult , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infertility, Female/therapy , Pilot Projects , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
6.
Can J Psychiatry ; 55(9): 568-76, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20840804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of gambling in people who have been diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD). Secondary objectives were to examine: sex differences in the rates of gambling behaviour, the temporal relation between onset of mood disorders and problem gambling, psychiatric comorbidities associated with problem gambling, and the influences of problem gambling on quality of life. METHOD: People (aged 18 years and older) who met criteria for lifetime Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision-defined MDD or BD I or II, and were confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, were enrolled. Participants were recruited from 5 sites in Canada and 1 in the United States. Prevalence of past-year problem gambling was assessed with the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Associated comorbidities with problem gambling are presented. RESULTS: A total of 579 participants were enrolled (female: n = 379, male: n = 200). Prevalence of problem gambling did not differ significantly between the MDD (12.5%) and the BD (12.3%) groups. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of problem gambling between males (19.5%) and females (7.8%) in the BD group (chi-square = 8.695, df = 1, P = 0.003). Among people meeting criteria for problem gambling, the mood disorder was the primary onset condition in 71% of cases. People with a mood disorder with comorbid current panic disorder (OR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.75), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.45), specific phobia (OR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.17 to 4.76), alcohol dependence (OR = 5.73; 95% CI 3.08 to 10.65), or lifetime substance dependence (OR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.17 to 3.58), had significantly increased odds of problem gambling. Problem gambling across MDD and BD populations was also associated with lower quality of life ratings. CONCLUSION: These results reaffirm a higher prevalence of gambling both in BD and in MDD populations, compared with previously published community samples. Our study also identifies risk factors for gambling behaviours within these populations.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Gambling/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Canada/epidemiology , Confidence Intervals , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Female , Gambling/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Personality Inventory , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Time Factors
7.
Am J Psychiatry ; 161(5): 836-42, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15121648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous antidepressant maintenance trials have used the same medication from acute through maintenance phases, confounding the interpretation of prophylactic effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sertraline prevents the recurrence of major depressive disorder among patients with recurrent depression who had been treated to remission with medications other than sertraline. METHOD: Patients who had experienced at least three documented episodes of major depressive disorder within the last 4 years and who were currently in full remission were eligible. The last episode must have been treated for at least 4 months with any antidepressant except sertraline. For the initial single-blind placebo lead-in phase, 371 patients were included; 288 were included in the analyses for the 18-month double-blind phase in which patients were randomly assigned to sertraline (50 or 100 mg) or placebo (two capsules per day). Recurrence was defined as a depressive episode that fulfilled DSM-IV criteria or the appearance of symptoms that required the administration of another antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients discontinued before the double-blind phase, including 33 who experienced a relapse. Out of the 288 who entered the double-blind prophylactic phase, 123 discontinued, including 65 for recurrences. Recurrences were significantly lower in the sertraline groups compared with placebo (sertraline, 50 mg: 16 [16.8%] of 95; sertraline, 100 mg: 16 [17.0%] of 94; placebo: 33 [33.3%] of 99). Patients treated with sertraline also had a significantly longer time until recurrence compared with placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among remitted patients with a history of multiple depressive episodes, sertraline at a dose of either 50 or 100 mg/day prevented recurrences significantly more than did placebo.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/prevention & control , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Adult , Clinical Protocols , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Secondary Prevention , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 17 Suppl 1: S43-50, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12369610

ABSTRACT

The utility of milnacipran in the treatment of major depression has been the subject of an extensive clinical development programme. Comparative studies with tricyclic antidepressant drugs have demonstrated equivalent efficacy, with improved tolerability, in particular with respect to autonomic effects. In comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), milnacipran shows similar good tolerability. It appears superior to such drugs in the treatment of severe depression, but equivalent to them for mild to moderate depression. In contrast to treatment with SSRIs, treatment response to milnacipran appears to be associated with the degree of psychomotor retardation. The good tolerability of milnacipran makes it safe in overdose. This drug also has a beneficial effect on suicidal ideation. Maintenance therapy with milnacipran has been demonstrated to reduce the recurrence of depressive episodes.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cyclopropanes/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Milnacipran
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...