Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Schizophr Res ; 216: 374-381, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806524

ABSTRACT

People with psychosis often develop metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, due to several factors including unhealthy lifestyle and antipsychotic treatment. This study aims to evaluate in a sample of first episode psychosis (FEP) patients lifestyle factors, with a specific emphasis on dietary habits and physical activity, and cardio-metabolic and anthropometric profile at illness onset and at 9 months. Moreover, this study aims to evaluate the impact of lifestyle factors on short term changes in cardio-metabolic and anthropometric profile. A 9-month follow-up study was conducted on a sample of 96 FEP patients recruited within the context of the GET UP program. Standardised assessments of dietary habits (EPIC) and physical activity (IPAQ) were retrospectively performed at 9 months; cardiovascular measures (blood pressure, heart rate), metabolic parameters (glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides), BMI and antipsychotic treatment were assessed at illness onset and at 9 months. We found that most FEP patients (60%) displayed poor dietary habits, as defined in terms of adherence to the Mediterranean diet. A significant increase for both BMI and cholesterol levels was found in the overall sample over 9 months. However, when considering the effect of lifestyle factors, BMI and total cholesterol were specifically raised in patients with low adherence to Mediterranean diet. The association with antipsychotic medication was found for SGA only, with a significant increase in both BMI and total cholesterol overtime. Our findings confirm the need to implement specific and early strategies to promote healthy lifestyle in people with FEP, since metabolic alterations occur within the first months of treatment.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders , Exercise , Feeding Behavior , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Social Welfare
2.
Schizophr Bull ; 41(5): 1192-203, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25995057

ABSTRACT

Integrated multi-element psychosocial interventions have been suggested to improve the outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, but they have been studied primarily in experimental settings and in nonepidemiologically representative samples. Thus, we performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing an integrated multi-element psychosocial intervention, comprising cognitive behavioral therapy, family intervention, and case management, with treatment as usual (TAU) for FEP patients in 117 community mental health centers (CMHCs) in a large area of northern Italy (10 million inhabitants). The randomized units (clusters) were the CMHCs, and the units of observation the patients (and, when available, their family members). The primary hypotheses were that add-on multicomponent intervention: (1) results in greater improvements in symptoms, as assessed with positive and negative syndrome scale and (2) reduces in-hospital stay, based on days of hospitalization over the 9-month follow-up. Four hundred and forty-four FEP patients received the intervention or TAU and were assessed at baseline and 9 months. Based on the retention rates of patients (and families) in the experimental arm, multi-element psychosocial interventions can be implemented in routine mental health services. Regarding primary outcomes, patients in the experimental arm showed greater reductions in overall symptom severity, while no difference could be found for days of hospitalization. Among the secondary outcomes, greater improvements were detected in the experimental arm for global functioning, emotional well-being, and subjective burden of delusions. No difference could be found for service disengagement and subjective burden of auditory hallucinations. These findings support feasibility and effectiveness of early interventions for psychosis in generalist mental health services.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Community Mental Health Centers , Family Therapy/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adult , Case Management , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male
3.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; 43(4): 478-89, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24360498

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Historically, it has been difficult to demonstrate an impact of training in psychological interventions for people with psychosis on routine practice and on patient outcomes. A recent pilot evaluation suggested that postgraduate training in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) increased the delivery of competent therapy in routine services. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes for patients receiving therapy from therapists who successfully completed training, and their association with ratings of therapist competence and therapy content. AIMS: To characterize the therapy delivered during training and to inform both a calculation of effect size for its clinical impact, and the development of competence benchmarks to ensure that training standards are sufficient to deliver clinical improvement. METHOD: Paired patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were extracted from anonymized therapy case reports, and were matched with therapy ratings for each therapist. RESULTS: Twenty clients received a course of competent therapy, including a high frequency of active therapy techniques, from nine therapists. Pre-post effect size for change in psychotic symptoms was large (d = 1.0) and for affect, medium (d = 0.6), but improved outcomes were not associated with therapist competence or therapy content. CONCLUSIONS: Therapists trained to research trial standards of competence achieved excellent clinical outcomes. Therapy effect sizes suggest that training costs may be offset by clinical benefit. Larger, methodologically stringent evaluations of training are now required. Future research should assess the necessary and sufficient training required to achieve real-world clinical effectiveness, and the cost-effectiveness of training.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/education , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/standards , Professional Competence , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Self Report , Teaching , Treatment Outcome
4.
Stress ; 17(5): 410-5, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25068285

ABSTRACT

COMT Val(158)Met moderates the effect of stress on psychotic symptoms. Exposure to stress is also associated with mesolimbic dopamine release in individuals experiencing low maternal care. We therefore test the hypothesis that recent stressful life events are associated with more severe positive symptoms (associated with mesolimbic dopamine release) in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients who experienced low maternal care during childhood. We hypothesized that COMT Val(158)Met moderates this association. A total of 149 FEP patients recruited within the Psychosis Incident Cohort Outcome Study (PICOS) participated in the present study. Maternal care was assessed by the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), stressful life events were collected by the List of Events Scale and positive symptoms were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that low maternal care and recent stressful life events were associated with higher level of positive symptoms at the onset (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p = 0.012), and that patients who were also homozygotes for the COMT Val(158) allele had the highest level of positive symptoms (ANOVA, p = 0.024). Low maternal care and severe stressful life events may contribute to a symptomatology characterized by more severe positive symptoms at the onset, possibly due to an increased mesolimbic dopamine release. Homozygosity for the COMT Val(158) allele seems to confer a biological predisposition to the stress-related hyperactivity of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. The data imply that the mesolimbic dopaminergic system is involved in the mediation/modulation of the effect of stressful events on the vulnerability for psychosis.


Subject(s)
Catechol O-Methyltransferase/genetics , Life Change Events , Maternal Behavior/psychology , Mother-Child Relations/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Alleles , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Psychotic Disorders/genetics , Stress, Psychological/genetics , Young Adult
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 65(8): 1034-40, 2014 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24788167

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe patterns of experienced and anticipated discrimination in a sample of persons experiencing a first episode of psychosis and to explore associations with clinical and psychosocial variables. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted within the context of the Psychosis Incident Cohort Outcome Study, a multisite naturalistic study examining first-episode patients treated in public psychiatric services in the Veneto Region of Italy. The Discrimination and Stigma Scale was used to assess experienced and anticipated discrimination. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were interviewed. Experiences of discrimination were common in relationships with family members (43%), making friends (32%), relationships with neighbors (25%), keeping a job (25%), finding a job (24%), and intimate relationships (23%). In regard to anticipated discrimination, 37% had stopped seeking a close relationship and 34% had stopped looking for work, 58% felt the need to conceal their diagnosis, and 37% reported that other people avoided them. In regression analysis, a higher number of functioning needs together with higher anticipated discrimination were associated with a higher level of experienced discrimination. A higher level of experienced discrimination and greater illness awareness were associated with more anticipated discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: First-episode patients reported experiencing discrimination in several key life areas. Anticipated discrimination further limited their access to life opportunities. Patients' awareness of the negative consequences of symptoms and disabilities led them to more easily perceive discrimination.


Subject(s)
Prejudice/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Anticipation, Psychological , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Perception , Young Adult
6.
Br J Psychiatry ; 205(2): 127-34, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24723631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Considerable variations in the incidence of psychosis have been observed across countries, in terms of age, gender, immigration status, urbanicity and socioeconomic deprivation. AIMS: To evaluate the incidence rate of first-episode psychosis in a large area of north-eastern Italy and the distribution of the above-mentioned risk factors in individuals with psychoses. METHOD: Epidemiologically based survey. Over a 3-year period individuals with psychosis on first contact with services were identified and diagnosed according to ICD-10 criteria. RESULTS: In total, 558 individuals with first-episode psychosis were identified during 3,077,555 person-years at risk. The annual incidence rate per 100,000 was 18.1 for all psychoses, 14.3 for non-affective psychoses and 3.8 for affective psychoses. The rate for all psychoses was higher in young people aged 20-29 (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 4.18, 95% CI 2.77-6.30), immigrants (IRR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.85-2.75) and those living in the most deprived areas (IRR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.54-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate in our study area was lower than that found in other European and North American studies and provides new insights into the factors that may increase and/or decrease risk for developing psychosis.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Poverty/psychology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Social Environment , Young Adult
7.
J Psychiatr Res ; 47(4): 438-44, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23290558

ABSTRACT

Cannabis use is frequent among first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and has been associated with several clinical features. This study aimed in an FEP sample to determine whether cannabis use is associated with (1) a higher level of positive symptoms, a lower level of depression and a better premorbid adjustment, (2) an earlier age of onset, and a better premorbid IQ. The study was conducted within the framework of the Psychosis Incident Cohort Outcome Study (PICOS), a multisite collaborative research on FEP patients who attended the psychiatric services in Veneto Region, Italy. Standardized instruments were used to collect sociodemographic, clinical, and drug use data. A total of 555 FEP patients met the inclusion criteria, 517 of whom received an ICD-10 diagnosis of psychosis; 397 (55% males; mean age: 32 yrs ± 9.5) were assessed. Out of these, 311 patients agreed to be interviewed on drug and alcohol misuse; 20.3% was positive for drug misuse: cannabis (19.0%), cocaine (3.9%), and hallucinogens (3.9%). Cannabis use was not associated with a higher level of positive symptoms, but correlated with less severe depressive symptoms. No relationship was observed between premorbid adjustment or IQ and cannabis use. FEP patients who used cannabis had an earlier age of onset than abstinent patients, even after adjusting for gender and diagnosis. Our results suggest a possible causal role of cannabis in triggering psychosis in certain vulnerable subjects. Particular attention must be paid to this behaviour, because reducing cannabis use can delay or prevent some cases of psychosis.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Analysis of Variance , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Trials ; 13: 73, 2012 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22647399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multi-element interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) are promising, but have mostly been conducted in non-epidemiologically representative samples, thereby raising the risk of underestimating the complexities involved in treating FEP in 'real-world' services. METHODS/DESIGN: The Psychosis early Intervention and Assessment of Needs and Outcome (PIANO) trial is part of a larger research program (Genetics, Endophenotypes and Treatment: Understanding early Psychosis - GET UP) which aims to compare, at 9 months, the effectiveness of a multi-component psychosocial intervention versus treatment as usual (TAU) in a large epidemiologically based cohort of patients with FEP and their family members recruited from all public community mental health centers (CMHCs) located in two entire regions of Italy (Veneto and Emilia Romagna), and in the cities of Florence, Milan and Bolzano. The GET UP PIANO trial has a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled design. The randomized units (clusters) are the CMHCs, and the units of observation are the centers' patients and their family members. Patients in the experimental group will receive TAU plus: 1) cognitive behavioral therapy sessions, 2) psycho-educational sessions for family members, and 3) case management. Patient enrollment will take place over a 1-year period. Several psychopathological, psychological, functioning, and service use variables will be assessed at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcomes are: 1) change from baseline to follow-up in positive and negative symptoms' severity and subjective appraisal; 2) relapse occurrences between baseline and follow-up, that is, episodes resulting in admission and/or any case-note records of re-emergence of positive psychotic symptoms. The expected number of recruited patients is about 400, and that of relatives about 300. Owing to the implementation of the intervention at the CMHC level, the blinding of patients, clinicians, and raters is not possible, but every effort will be made to preserve the independency of the raters. We expect that this study will generate evidence on the best treatments for FEP, and will identify barriers that may hinder its feasibility in 'real-world' clinical settings, patient/family conditions that may render this intervention ineffective or inappropriate, and clinical, psychological, environmental, and service organization predictors of treatment effectiveness, compliance, and service satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Community Mental Health Services , Family Relations , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Research Design , Cluster Analysis , Community Mental Health Centers , Humans , Italy , Patient Selection , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Recurrence , Sample Size , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Br J Psychiatry ; 195(6): 537-44, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Staff burnout is a critical issue for mental healthcare delivery, as it can lead to decreased work performance and, ultimately, to poorer treatment outcomes. AIMS: To explore the relative weight of job-related characteristics and perceived organisational factors in predicting burnout in staff working in community-based psychiatric services. METHOD: A representative sample of 2000 mental health staff working in the Veneto region, Italy, participated. Burnout and perceived organisational factors were assessed by using the Organizational Checkup Survey. RESULTS: Overall, high levels of job distress affected nearly two-thirds of the psychiatric staff and one in five staff members suffered from burnout. Psychiatrists and social workers reported the highest levels of burnout, and support workers and psychologists, the lowest. Burnout was mostly predicted by a higher frequency of face-to-face interaction with users, longer tenure in mental healthcare, weak work group cohesion and perceived unfairness. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the workplace atmosphere within psychiatric services should be one of the most important targets in staff burnout prevention strategies. The potential benefits of such programmes may, in turn, have a favourable impact on patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Organizational Culture , Workload/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Aged , Allied Health Personnel/organization & administration , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , Community Health Nursing/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Social Work/organization & administration , Socioeconomic Factors , Workplace/organization & administration
10.
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc ; 17(4): 291-304, 2008.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19024718

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This paper aims at presenting the most significant results emerging from the work carried out by the focus groups of the multi-centre Project SIEP-DIRECT'S. The Project is aimed at assessing the existing discrepancies between the evidence-based NICE guidelines for schizophrenia and the usual practices of care given by Italian mental health services. Each focus group was requested to give an evaluation on: (a) appropriateness of the English NICE guidelines in the context of the Italian mental health services; (b) clarity and usefulness of the 103 indicators developed on the basis of the NICE recommendations to measure their level of application within the services. METHODS: In each of the 19 mental health departments or psychiatric services participating in the Project there were organized "multidisciplinary" focus groups and "specialistic" focus groups. The former included, amongst others, professional operators of the mental health services, patients, their relatives, representatives of patient organizations and general practitioners. They examined the recommendations and indicators upon which the participants could express their opinion or judgment based on their knowledge, experience or information in their possession. The latter group, composed only of psychiatrists, examined the recommendations and indicators relative to pharmacological treatments that regarded the specific competences of their professional category. RESULTS: Most NICE recommendations seemed appropriate to the working context of the Italian services. However, some perplexity emerged as regards specific organizational models of the services, such as the specific services for psychotic onsets or the assertive outreach teams, which were believed not to be strictly pertinent to the traditional organization of mental health care in our Country. There were also some criticisms regarding the cognitive-behavioural treatments which the NICE Guidelines recommend as the principle psychotherapeutic option for patients with schizophrenia, since in many Italian services, when the use of psychological interventions are needed, the tendency is to prefer interventions based on psychodynamic theories. The SIEP indicators were generally held to be clear and acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: In the view of the focus groups, the NICE guidelines are on the whole useful and suitable for orientating the services in the choice of more efficacious practices in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Moreover, the results obtained legitimate the use of the set of SIEP indicators for the evaluation of good practices and the quality of care offered by Italian services. Finally, the use of focus groups delines to a different context as well as the verification of the comprehensibility and applicability of SIEP indicators.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Schizophrenia/therapy , Humans , Italy , Societies, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...