Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplantation ; 72(1): 107-11, 2001 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11468543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the dominant cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a known risk factor. After renal transplantation, persistent hypertension is an important determinant for the further evolution of LVH. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) (controlled release nifedipine) in treatment of posttransplant hypertension focusing on changes in LVH. METHODS: One hundred fifty-four renal transplant recipients presenting with hypertension (diastolic BP> or =95 mmHg) during the first 3 weeks after transplantation were randomized to receive double-blind 30 mg nifedipine or 10 mg lisinopril once daily. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients completed 1 year of treatment. Good quality echocardiographic data were available in 116 recipients (62 nifedipine/54 lisinopril) 2 and 12 months posttransplant. Blood pressure was equally well controlled in the two groups throughout the study (mean systolic/diastolic+/-SD after 1 year: 140+/-16/87+/-8 mmHg with nifedipine and 136+/-17/85+/-8 mmHg with lisinopril). Left ventricular mass index was reduced by 15% (P<0.001) in both groups (from 153+/-43 to 131+/-38 g/m2 with nifedipine and from 142+/-35 to 121+/-34 g/m2 with lisinopril). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups at baseline or at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive renal transplant recipients with well-controlled blood pressure, there is a regression of left ventricular mass after renal transplantation. The regression of left ventricular mass index is observed to a similar extent in patients treated with lisinopril or nifedipine.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Echocardiography , Heart/drug effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Lisinopril/therapeutic use , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Ventricles , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lisinopril/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Nifedipine/administration & dosage , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 13(2): 427-31, 1998 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9509457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus is a known complication of steroid therapy in renal transplant recipients. Both insulin resistance and insulin deficiency have been shown to be necessary for development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. It is not known whether recipients with impaired glucose tolerance have similar degree of insulin resistance or deficient insulin response as recipients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus. METHOD: To address this question, we used an oral glucose tolerance test to categorize 46 renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppressive medication to groups with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance or post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Insulin sensitivity was measured using a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Insulin response was calculated from the increase in serum insulin concentration during the oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Twenty-five were categorized to normal glucose tolerance, 15 to impaired glucose tolerance and six to post-transplant diabetes mellitus. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding prednisolone dose, azathioprine dose, use of beta-blocker, age, gender, weight, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, donor source, smoking habits, or first-degree relatives with histories of diabetes mellitus. The impaired glucose tolerance and post-transplant diabetes mellitus groups showed a significant reduction in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate (mg/kg.min) compared to the normal glucose tolerance group (4.6 +/- 1.6 and 3.4 +/- 1.3 respectively vs 7.1 +/- 2.4, P < 0.05). The insulin response (picomol/l) was not different between the normal glucose tolerance and impaired glucose tolerance groups but was significantly reduced in the post-transplant diabetes mellitus group (448 +/- 310 and 450 +/- 291 respectively vs 170 +/- 128, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Insulin resistance is a common denominator of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in renal transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Glucose Intolerance , Insulin Resistance , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Female , Glucose Clamp Technique , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Insulin/blood , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Osmolar Concentration , Postoperative Complications , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...