Anthropometric and cephalometric measurements in X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the somatic development and craniofacial morphology in males affected with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) and female carriers and to find clinical markers for early clinical diagnosis of possible female carriers. DESIGN: A clinical and radiographic examination of the affected males and the female carriers. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty-four affected males and 43 female carriers with a known mutation in the ED1 gene were examined in a dental clinic in either Copenhagen or Aarhus, Denmark. EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLES: Height, body mass index (BMI) and head circumference. Cephalometric analysis of the craniofacial morphology. OUTCOME MEASURE: Data on the somatic and craniofacial development in the affected males and female carriers. RESULTS: No difference was observed regarding body height in the affected males and female carriers, BMI values were lower than the mean in most affected boys and adolescence and head circumference was somewhat decreased in both groups compared to normative data. The cephalometric analysis showed a reduced maxilla length and prognathism, a normal size and shape of the mandible and a reduced sagittal jaw relationship in both HED groups. Furthermore, affected males had a retroclined nasal bone and a more anteriorly inclined maxilla. A short nose, protruding lips, reduced facial convexity and facial height, characterized the soft tissue profile of the affected males. In female carriers, the lips were significantly retruded when compared with controls. CONCLUSION: No specific somatic or cephalometric markers could be observed, in the female carrier group.

Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback.

PURPOSE: A computerized, cephalometric, orthognathic surgical program (TIOPS) was applied in orthognathic surgical simulation, treatment planning, and postoperatively to assess precision and stability of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with dentofacial deformities requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback were included. All patients were managed with rigid internal fixation (RIF) of the maxilla and mandible and without maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Preoperative cephalograms were analyzed and treatment plans produced by computerized surgical simulation. Planned, 5-week postoperative and 1-year postoperative maxillary and mandibular cephalometric-positions were compared. RESULTS: In the mandibular advancement group, the anterior maxilla was placed too far superiorly, with an inaccuracy of 0.4 mm. The posterior maxilla and the anterior mandible were placed in the planned positions. The lower posterior part of the mandibular ramus was placed too far anteriorly, with an inaccuracy of 2.0 mm. However, the mandibular condyles were accurately placed. In the setback group, the anterior maxilla was placed too far superiorly and posteriorly, with a vertical and sagittal inaccuracy of 1.0 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively. The posterior part of the maxilla was placed in a posterior position with an inaccuracy of 1.9 mm. The anterior mandible was placed too far anteriorly with an inaccuracy of 0.9 mm. The lower posterior part of the mandibular ramus was placed in a posterior position with an inaccuracy of 0.9 mm. However, the mandibular condyles were accurately placed. The statistical analysis of the 1-year stability data showed that the maxilla had moved 0.3 mm posteriorly in the advancement group and the lower incisors had moved 0.8 mm superiorly. No other significant positional maxillary or mandibular changes were found. In the setback group, the maxilla had moved 0.5 mm posteriorly, the anterior mandible 0.5 mm anteriorly, and the lower incisors 0.7 mm superiorly. No significant positional changes were seen in the mandibular ramus. CONCLUSION: The TIOPS computerized, cephalometric, orthognathic program is useful in orthognathic surgical simulation, planning, and prediction, and in postoperative evaluation of surgical precision and stability. The simulated treatment plan can be transferred to model surgery and finally to the orthognathic surgical procedures. The results show that this technique yields acceptable postoperative precision and stability.

Precision of orthognathic surgery. A computerized cephalometric analysis of 27 patients.

The precision of orthognathic surgery was evaluated in 27 patients. Rigid internal skeletal fixation was used without intermaxillary fixation. A computerized cephalometric program package (TIOPS) was utilized in the preoperative analysis, surgical planning, and postoperative examination. The mean positional difference of the cephalometric landmarks between planned and observed outcome ranged from -0.4 to 0.7 mm. Only one reference point (pm) differed statistically significantly from the plan (P = 0.02). All other mean differences in point location were of a magnitude that was not statistically different from zero (P > 0.05). It was concluded that no systematic sources of error could be demonstrated. However, the range of random variation in the individual cases left room for considerable improvement.

Predictive value of Müller maneuver, cephalometry and clinical features for the outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Evaluation of predictive factors using discriminant analysis in 30 sleep apnea patients.

The success rate of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea is generally only 50-60%. In order to improve this, various predictive factors for the outcome of UPPP were studied, including the Müller maneuver and cephalometry. Thirty unselected consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (median apnea index (AI) 26 apneas/h, range 5-78) underwent UPPP with standard tonsillectomy except in the case of small tonsils and using CO2 laser for the palatal resection. Polysomnographic control 5 months after surgery showed that 63% of all patients had obtained a reduction in AI > or = 50% including an AI < 20 after surgery. Tonsillectomy had no influence on the outcome. Further, the Müller maneuver did not predict the outcome, whereas cephalometry proved to be of good predictive value. Lowered position of the hyoid bone, increased cranio-cervical angle and shortening of the maxilla length were significantly associated with poor results of UPPP, as were overweight, narrowing of the hypopharynx, the severity of sleep apnea, and hypersomnia. However, in a discriminant analysis containing all these variables, the three cephalometric measurements together with hypersomnia were most closely associated with the outcome of UPPP. A predictive model containing these four variables could correctly classify 83% of the patients in the present study. The model had a false positive rate of 7% in predicting a successful outcome. This indicates that cephalometry is mandatory in the selection of UPPP candidates and that a predictive model containing some or all of the four variables may substantially improve the success rate.

Computerized cephalometric orthognathic surgical simulation, prediction and postoperative evaluation of precision.

A new computerized, cephalometric, orthognathic surgical program (TIOPS) has been evaluated in surgical simulation, prediction and postoperative assessment of precision. Records of 10 consecutive patients admitted for orthognathic surgical treatment were analysed and prediction plans produced by computerized surgical simulation. Predicted and postoperative positions of maxilla and mandible were compared with linear and angular measurements. No statistically significant differences between predicted and postoperative positions could be demonstrated (p greater than 0.05).