Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiology ; 203(2): 348-54, 1997 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9114087

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate how anode-filter combinations influence image quality in and mean glandular dose to breasts of different thicknesses and compositions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms were obtained with a molybdenum (Mo) anode and a Mo filter at 26 kVp, a Mo anode and a rhodium (Rh) filter at 27 kVp, or a tungsten (W) anode and a Rh filter at 26 kVp in 965 women. One anode-filter-tube voltage combination was used in the right breast and another in the left. The mean glandular dose to each breast was calculated. RESULTS: Image contrast was highest in the Mo-Mo mammograms. However, depiction of the glandular tissue, pectoral muscle, and skin and subcutis was significantly (P < .001) better with the Mo-Rh and the W-Rh than with the Mo-Mo combination. The average mean absorbed doses to the glandular tissue for W-Rh and Mo-Rh were 50% and 75%, respectively, of that for Mo-Mo. CONCLUSION: Breast thickness is the most important parameter in selection of an anode-filter-tube voltage combination. Compared with Mo-Mo, both Mo-Rh and W-Rh gave good image quality of the mammary gland and a considerably lower absorbed dose. Mo-Rh-27 kVp is recommended for breast thicknesses of 60 mm or less; W-Rh-26 kVp, for breast thicknesses of greater than 60 mm.


Subject(s)
Mammography/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Female , Filtration , Humans , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , Molybdenum , Radiation Dosage , Rhodium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...