Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Neurol ; 11: 1027, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33132997

ABSTRACT

For people with disordered consciousness (DoC) after traumatic brain injury (TBI), relationships between treatment-induced changes in neural connectivity and neurobehavioral recovery have not been explored. To begin building a body of evidence regarding the unique contributions of treatments to changes in neural network connectivity relative to neurobehavioral recovery, we conducted a pilot study to identify relationships meriting additional examination in future research. To address this objective, we examined previously unpublished neural connectivity data derived from a randomized clinical trial (RCT). We leveraged these data because treatment efficacy, in the RCT, was based on a comparison of a placebo control with a specific intervention, the familiar auditory sensory training (FAST) intervention, consisting of autobiographical auditory-linguistic stimuli. We selected a subgroup of RCT participants with high-quality imaging data (FAST n = 4 and placebo n = 4) to examine treatment-related changes in brain network connectivity and how and if these changes relate to neurobehavioral recovery. To discover promising relationships among the FAST intervention, changes in neural connectivity, and neurobehavioral recovery, we examined 26 brain regions and 19 white matter tracts associated with default mode, salience, attention, and language networks, as well as three neurobehavioral measures. Of the relationships discovered, the systematic filtering process yielded evidence supporting further investigation of the relationship among the FAST intervention, connectivity of the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and auditory-language skills. Evidence also suggests that future mechanistic research should focus on examining the possibility that the FAST supports connectivity changes by facilitating redistribution of brain resources. For a patient population with limited treatment options, the reported findings suggest that a simple, yet targeted, passive sensory stimulation treatment may have altered functional and structural connectivity. If replicated in future research, then these findings provide the foundation for characterizing the unique contributions of the FAST intervention and could inform development of new treatment strategies. For persons with severely damaged brain networks, this report represents a first step toward advancing understanding of the unique contributions of treatments to changing brain network connectivity and how these changes relate to neurobehavioral recovery for persons with DoC after TBI. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT00557076, The Efficacy of Familiar Voice Stimulation During Coma Recovery (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

2.
Disabil Rehabil ; 40(8): 945-951, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28102097

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The evaluation and treatment for patients with prolonged periods of seriously impaired consciousness following traumatic brain injury (TBI), such as a vegetative or minimally conscious state, poses considerable challenges, particularly in the chronic phases of recovery. METHOD: This blinded crossover study explored the effects of familiar auditory sensory training (FAST) compared with a sham stimulation in a patient seven years post severe TBI. Baseline data were collected over 4 weeks to account for variability in status with neurobehavioral measures, including the Disorders of Consciousness scale (DOCS), Coma Near Coma scale (CNC), and Consciousness Screening Algorithm. Pre-stimulation neurophysiological assessments were completed as well, namely Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEP) and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP). RESULTS: Results revealed that a significant improvement in the DOCS neurobehavioral findings after FAST, which was not maintained during the sham. BAEP findings also improved with maintenance of these improvements following sham stimulation as evidenced by repeat testing. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize the importance for continued evaluation and treatment of individuals in chronic states of seriously impaired consciousness with a variety of tools. Further study of auditory stimulation as a passive treatment paradigm for this population is warranted. Implications for Rehabilitation Clinicians should be equipped with treatment options to enhance neurobehavioral improvements when traditional treatment methods fail to deliver or maintain functional behavioral changes. Routine assessment is crucial to detect subtle changes in neurobehavioral function even in chronic states of disordered consciousness and determine potential preserved cognitive abilities that may not be evident due to unreliable motor responses given motoric impairments. Familiar Auditory Stimulation Training (FAST) is an ideal passive stimulation that can be supplied by families, allied health clinicians and nursing staff of all levels.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Persistent Vegetative State/rehabilitation , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...