Pesticide aerosol characteristics in the vicinity of an agricultural vehicle cab during application.

Pesticide spraying for crop protection leads to the formation of a mist of droplets, part of which is dispersed into the atmosphere. The characteristics of this aerosol, namely its particle size distribution and concentration, were measured during five campaigns involving cereal crop growing, wine grape culture, and orcharding. The measurement method incorporated a tracer product (fluorescein) with the treatment product; the pesticide aerosol concentration was then deduced from the tracer concentration. This method was validated by comparing the pesticide concentration determined by tracing with the concentration determined by direct measurement of the active substance of the pesticide. Concentration was measured using sampling filters, and particle size distribution was measured using cascade impactors. Instruments were mounted on an agricultural vehicle cab to optimize aerosol characterization, and then the cab's confinement efficiency was determined. Aerosols analyzed were fine, featuring mass median diameters between 4 microm and 15 microm; they are therefore highly dispersive. Their concentration is sufficiently high to justify operator protection by an efficient, filtered-air, pressurized cab, especially in wine grape culture and orcharding, which are the sectors where the highest pesticide transfers have been observed.

Solvent ototoxicity in the rat and guinea pig.

There is clear evidence that aromatic solvents can disrupt the auditory system in humans and animals. As far as animal models are concerned, solvent-induced hearing loss seems to be species-dependent. Indeed, most published data have been obtained with the rat, which shows mid-frequency cochlear deficits, whereas the guinea pig does not show any permanent hearing loss after solvent exposure. In the current investigation, the effects of two solvents, toluene (600 ppm) and styrene (1000 ppm), were studied in both Long-Evans rats and pigmented guinea pigs exposed 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days. Cochlear function was tested by using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) measured prior to the solvent exposure, 20 min after the end of the exposure and successively at 2 and 4 weeks post-exposure. In addition to cochlear testing, solvent concentrations in blood and urinary metabolites were measured. A cochlear histological analysis was performed at the end of the experiment. No decrease in DPOAE amplitude was observed in the guinea pig, even immediately following the end of exposure. The rat model showed severe disruption of auditory function and cochlear pathology, whereas the guinea pig had no disruption of DPOAE or cochlear pathological alterations. Therefore, the vulnerability of the cochlear function was strictly dependent on the species. As expected, an important difference in the styrene concentration in blood was observed: the solvent concentrations were fourfold higher in the rat than in the guinea pig. Therefore, it is clear that a pharmacokinetic or an uptake difference might explain the difference in susceptibility observed between the two species. Moreover, the metabolism pathways of the solvents were different depending on the species. Attempts to explain differences of vulnerability between the rat and guinea pig are addressed in the present paper.