Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 9: 636615, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34422791

ABSTRACT

To preserve genome integrity when faced with DNA lesions, cells activate and coordinate a multitude of DNA repair pathways to ensure timely error correction or tolerance, collectively called the DNA damage response (DDR). These interconnecting damage response pathways are molecular signal relays, with protein kinases (PKs) at the pinnacle. Focused efforts in model eukaryotes have revealed intricate aspects of DNA repair PK function, including how they direct DDR pathways and how repair reactions connect to wider cellular processes, including DNA replication and transcription. The Kinetoplastidae, including many parasites like Trypanosoma spp. and Leishmania spp. (causative agents of debilitating, neglected tropical infections), exhibit peculiarities in several core biological processes, including the predominance of multigenic transcription and the streamlining or repurposing of DNA repair pathways, such as the loss of non-homologous end joining and novel operation of nucleotide excision repair (NER). Very recent studies have implicated ATR and ATM kinases in the DDR of kinetoplastid parasites, whereas DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) displays uncertain conservation, questioning what functions it fulfills. The wide range of genetic manipulation approaches in these organisms presents an opportunity to investigate DNA repair kinase roles in kinetoplastids and to ask if further kinases are involved. Furthermore, the availability of kinase inhibitory compounds, targeting numerous eukaryotic PKs, could allow us to test the suitability of DNA repair PKs as novel chemotherapeutic targets. Here, we will review recent advances in the study of trypanosomatid DNA repair kinases.

2.
Cell Rep ; 30(3): 836-851.e5, 2020 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31968257

ABSTRACT

Trypanosoma brucei evades mammalian immunity by using recombination to switch its surface-expressed variant surface glycoprotein (VSG), while ensuring that only one of many subtelomeric multigene VSG expression sites are transcribed at a time. DNA repair activities have been implicated in the catalysis of VSG switching by recombination, not transcriptional control. How VSG switching is signaled to guide the appropriate reaction or to integrate switching into parasite growth is unknown. Here, we show that the loss of ATR, a DNA damage-signaling protein kinase, is lethal, causing nuclear genome instability and increased VSG switching through VSG-localized damage. Furthermore, ATR loss leads to the increased transcription of silent VSG expression sites and expression of mixed VSGs on the cell surface, effects that are associated with the altered localization of RNA polymerase I and VEX1. This work shows that ATR acts in antigenic variation both through DNA damage signaling and surface antigen expression control.


Subject(s)
Antigenic Variation , Antigens, Surface/genetics , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/metabolism , DNA Damage , RNA Polymerase I/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/enzymology , Alleles , Cell Nucleus/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Gene Expression Regulation , Genome , Models, Biological , Protein Transport , Protozoan Proteins/metabolism , RNA Interference , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/cytology , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/genetics
3.
PLoS One ; 9(3): e91819, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24632839

ABSTRACT

Apicomplexan parasites are thought to actively invade the host cell by gliding motility. This movement is powered by the parasite's own actomyosin system, and depends on the regulated polymerisation and depolymerisation of actin to generate the force for gliding and host cell penetration. Recent studies demonstrated that Toxoplasma gondii can invade the host cell in the absence of several core components of the invasion machinery, such as the motor protein myosin A (MyoA), the microneme proteins MIC2 and AMA1 and actin, indicating the presence of alternative invasion mechanisms. Here the roles of MyoA, MLC1, GAP45 and Act1, core components of the gliding machinery, are re-dissected in detail. Although important roles of these components for gliding motility and host cell invasion are verified, mutant parasites remain invasive and do not show a block of gliding motility, suggesting that other mechanisms must be in place to enable the parasite to move and invade the host cell. A novel, hypothetical model for parasite gliding motility and invasion is presented based on osmotic forces generated in the cytosol of the parasite that are converted into motility.


Subject(s)
Host-Pathogen Interactions , Locomotion , Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIA/metabolism , Toxoplasma/physiology , Gene Knockout Techniques , Locomotion/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIA/genetics , Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIB/genetics , Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIB/metabolism , Phenotype , Protozoan Proteins/genetics , Protozoan Proteins/metabolism , Toxoplasma/pathogenicity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...