The Verbal IQ/Performance IQ discrepancy as a sign of seizure focus laterality in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

A large Verbal IQ (VIQ)/Performance IQ (PIQ) discrepancy has been viewed as a sign of lateralized brain dysfunction. The current study was conducted to determine if the presence of a large VIQ/PIQ discrepancy (15 points) would accurately predict laterality of seizure foci in pediatric patients with epilepsy. A discrepancy score (VIQ-PIQ) was calculated for 130 children (mean age=12.25) undergoing presurgical epilepsy evaluations. Patients were grouped on the basis of language mediation confirmed through the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Large discrepancies were noted in 34% of the group with typical language and 24% of the children with atypical language organization. When present, this discrepancy accurately lateralized seizure focus for 79% of those with typical and 57% of those with atypical language organization. The presence of the discrepancy was unrelated to seizure control following surgery for the atypical language group. In the typical language group, 85% of children with discrepancies, but only 63% of children without discrepancies, achieved seizure control. Results suggest that the presence of a large discrepancy is not effective, by itself, in lateralizing seizure foci, but may contribute to refining predictions of surgical outcome.

The importance of neuropsychological assessment for the evaluation of childhood learning disorders NAN Policy and Planning Committee.

When children experience learning difficulties, an appropriate evaluation of abilities and skills can provide the foundation for an accurate diagnosis and useful recommendations. When comprehensive information about a child's brain-related strengths and weaknesses is necessary to understand potential sources of the problem and implications for functioning, a neuropsychological evaluation is most often the best choice. This paper was written to help parents, educators, health care providers, and third-party payors to understand the nature of neuropsychological assessment and to choose the type of evaluation that will furnish relevant information for the child's educational planning.

Prediction of verbal memory decline after epilepsy surgery in children: effectiveness of Wada memory asymmetries.

PURPOSE: Differences in Wada memory performance after left and right amobarbital injection are powerful predictors of pre- to postoperative memory change among adult epilepsy patients after anterior temporal lobectomy. It is unknown, however, whether these Wada memory asymmetries apply to children who undergo focal cortical resection or to epilepsy surgery patients who undergo resection outside the temporal lobes. METHODS: To investigate these issues, Wada memory asymmetries and pre- to postoperative neuropsychological memory test performances were examined in 132 children who underwent some form of resective epilepsy surgery. Ninety-three (70%) children showed Wada memory asymmetries in the predicted direction (memory after injection ipsilateral to side of surgery better than memory after contralateral injection), and 39 (30%) did not. RESULTS: Children with Wada memory asymmetries showed significant improvement in verbal memory after surgery as compared with children without Wada memory asymmetries who showed significant verbal memory decline. This result was also obtained when individual cases were examined: 77% of children with Wada memory asymmetries in predicted direction showed no verbal memory decline after surgery, whereas 80% of children without asymmetries had lower postoperative verbal memory (passage recall) test scores. Wada memory asymmetries had no value in predicting postoperative changes in visual-spatial memory. CONCLUSIONS: Wada memory asymmetries may be used as one of the factors to assess risk for verbal memory decline after epilepsy surgery in children.

Wada memory performance predicts seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in children.

PURPOSE: Wada memory asymmetries were examined in children from four comprehensive epilepsy surgery centers who subsequently underwent epilepsy surgery to determine whether Wada memory performance could predict degree of seizure relief in children. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six children (between ages 5 and 16 years) with intractable epilepsy underwent Wada testing before resective epilepsy surgery (93 within the left hemisphere, and 63 within the right hemisphere). Memory stimuli were presented soon after intracarotid amobarbital injection, and recognition memory for the items was assessed after return to neurologic baseline. Eighty-eight children underwent unilateral temporal lobe resection, and 68 had extratemporal lobe resections. One hundred four (67%) children were seizure free (Engel class I), and 52 (33%) were not seizure free (Engel classes II-IV) at follow-up (mean follow-up interval, 2.3 years). RESULTS: Seizure-free children recalled 19.3% more Wada memory items after ipsilateral injection than did non-seizure-free children (p = 0.008). If analysis was restricted to youngsters with temporal lobectomies (TLs), seizure-free children recalled 27.7% more items after ipsilateral injection than did non-seizure-free TL children (p = 0.004). With regard to individual patient prediction, 75% of children who had memory score asymmetries consistent with the seizure focus were seizure free. In contrast, only 56% of children whose memory score asymmetries were inconsistent with the seizure focus were seizure free (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that Wada memory performance asymmetries are related to the degree of seizure relief after epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents.