Macular Findings of Patients on Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, a unique maculopathy associated with chronic pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) use for the treatment of interstitial cystitis (IC) was described, where the authors detailed macular retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in six patients. In this paper, a retrospective study of a larger patient pool at one large tertiary retina practice was undertaken to evaluate patients taking PPS and their macular findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients presenting to a single large retina practice between 2011 and 2019. Patient's macular diagnosis, findings, optical coherence tomography scans, and macular auto-fluorescent scans were assessed. This project was Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved by the St Luke's Hospital IRB board (St Louis, MO, USA). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were identified as taking PPS for IC. Fifty-three patients were found to have a diagnosis consistent with changes attributable to known macular diseases to include macular degeneration and pattern dystrophies. Two (4%) of fifty-five patients had macular findings suggestive of PPS toxicity. The first was a 58-year-old female with subtle retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) deposits on optical coherence tomography that exhibited hyper-autofluorescence. The second was a 72-year-old female with 14 years of PPS use who exhibited RPE excrescences and parafoveal areas of atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Pentosan polysulfate sodium may be the cause of macular findings in a small percentage of patients referred to a tertiary retina practice. Although causation of macular changes with PPS use has yet to be elucidated, clinicians should be aware of this possibility when assessing patients with atypical macular findings. Future longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate a definitive relationship. This paper should remind all clinicians of the importance of a throughout review of the patient's medication list as novel toxicities may become apparent years after initial FDA trials. The strength of this study is the larger patient population compared to earlier studies, and the main weaknesses include the retrospective nature of the study, lack of family and genetic testing, and lack of multimodal imaging for all patients.

Workup following retinal artery occlusion-experience from an outpatient retina clinic and the delay in workup.

PURPOSE: Acute retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is an urgent ophthalmic condition often indicative of future ischemic pathology. Patients diagnosed at an outpatient retina clinic must present to an emergency department (ED) or primary care clinic to obtain a systemic workup. We review the overall compliance and suspected delay in completing the required testing. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study METHODS: Patients presenting with a symptomatic RAO from June 2009 to January 2019 at a vitreoretinal practice (The Retina Institute, St. Louis, MO) were included. Documentation of carotid vasculature and echocardiographic imaging was requested from the patient's primary care physician (PCP), cardiologist, or neurologist. Time to workup (TTW) from RAO diagnosis to receiving appropriate workup and site of workup (ED vs. outpatient setting) were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven patients were included. A total of 132 (89.8%) patients were documented as having completed at least one type of cardiovascular or carotid imaging. Seventy-seven patients (52.3%) were documented to have completed both carotid and echocardiographic imaging. Following RAO diagnosis, 97 (66.0%) patients were referred to an outpatient facility while 35 (23.8%) were evaluated at an ED. Mean TTW through an ED setting vs. outpatient was 2.20 days (1.10 STDM, range 0-29) vs.13.6 days (2.23 STDM, range 0-149) respectively (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study gives objective data to the delay suspected in referring patients with acute symptomatic RAO for outpatient workup. We recommend all outpatient ophthalmology and retina practices establish a relationship with a comprehensive or primary stroke center to facilitate urgent testing through an emergency department.

OCT Assistance in Identifying Retinal Breaks in Symptomatic Posterior Vitreous Detachments.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is a separation of the posterior hyaloid from the retina that manifests as photopsias and floaters. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has demonstrated posterior vitreous opacities (PVOs) that may correlate with Shaffer's sign, which may correlate with retinal breaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic PVDs were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution by a single provider. Masked qualitative review of SD-OCTs by a single reviewer determined presence of PVOs. RESULTS: Among 78 patients, PVOs were found in 32 of the patients (41%), and 19 (59%) had retinal breaks. In those without PVOs, six (13%) had a break. Sensitivity and specificity were 76.0% and 75.5%, respectively. Removing patients with vitreous hemorrhages, sensitivity, and specificity of PVOs was 82.4% and 86.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic PVDs, PVOs on OCT correlated with the presence of a retinal break, especially in the absence of a vitreous hemorrhage. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:628-632.].

Analysis of Emergent Nonhospital-Based Retina Consultation Requests in an Academic Nonhospital-Associated Retina Practice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of after-hour encounters concerning patients referred by eye physicians to on-call retina services for emergent evaluation not seen in or referred by an emergency department. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeking treatment at 3 private practice institutions over a 2-year period between 2017 and 2018. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted comprising all patients who sought treatment emergently and after clinic hours from 3 academic nonhospital-associated retina-only private practice institutions over a 2-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient presenting symptoms, diagnosis given at time of after-hours appointment, duration of symptoms, source of after-hours consultation (patient or provider), procedure performed at appointment, and appointments that led to surgery. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-seven charts were reviewed. Provider referrals accounted for 49.13% (n = 485) and patient-derived referrals accounted for 50% (n = 493) of appointments. New patients accounted for 27.6% (n = 146) of patient-derived and 85.2% (n = 413) of provider-derived referrals. The most common presenting symptoms were flashes and floaters (42.5%; n = 420), decrease in visual acuity (32.1%; n = 317), generalized eye pain (7.4%; n = 73), visual field disturbance (4.3%; n = 42), and postoperative ocular pain (3.4%; n = 34). An in-office procedure was performed at the time of examination in 18% of encounters (n = 178), with most of these being laser retinopexy. Surgery was performed within 24 hours in 18% (n = 180), within 48 hours in 20.6% (n = 203), within 72 hours in 21.7% (n = 214), and within 96 hours in 22.6% (n = 223) of the appointment. When combined with procedures, 36.2% (n = 358) of encounters led to urgent intervention within 24 hours. If a provider called about an existing patient, 37.5% of these appointments (n = 27) led to surgery versus 12.8% (n = 49) if an existing patient self-referred. If a provider called about a new patient, 31.7% of these appointments (n = 131) led to surgery versus 10% (n = 14) if a new patient self-referred. CONCLUSIONS: At these 3 private practice retinal specialty clinics, 41% of after-hours appointment requests resulted in an intervention within 96 hours, and 36% of these patients underwent an intervention within 24 hours.

Long-Term Outcomes in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 With Subretinal Neovascularization.

Purpose: This work reports long-term outcomes in macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) with subretinal neovascularization (SRNV). Methods: A retrospective, single-center review of medical records was performed on all patients with a diagnosis of MacTel presenting between May 2004 and October 2019. Medical and ocular history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline and final visit, optical coherence tomography data, and treatment history of SRNV secondary to MacTel were recorded. Results: A total of 471 eyes were diagnosed with MacTel. SRNV was present in 44 eyes (9.3%), of which 38 eyes met inclusion criteria for SRNV. Average follow-up duration in the SRNV group was 78.4 months. All SRNV patients underwent antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. There was no significant change from mean baseline (0.59 ± 0.45) to final (0.70 ± 0.49) BCVA in the SRNV group as a whole (P = .13). Subgroup analysis revealed 17 of 38 eyes had SRNV at diagnosis and received immediate anti-VEGF treatment. In this subgroup mean pretreatment BCVA was 0.89 ± 0.43 and the mean final BCVA was 0.87 ± 0.61 (P = .84). The remainder (21 of 38 eyes) developed SRNV during follow-up. In this subgroup, final BCVA after initiation of treatment was 0.56 ± 0.32, an improvement in BCVA from SRNV onset (P = .04) and a decrease from pre-SRNV onset baseline BCVA (P = .008). Conclusions: Visual acuity is maintained, not improved, in long-term follow-up of MacTel with SRNV treated with anti-VEGF. Patients presenting with SRNV have a worse prognosis than those who develop SRNV during follow-up.

Epiretinal Membrane Formation after Treatment of Retinal Breaks: Cryoretinopexy versus Laser Retinopexy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to study the prevalence of macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation for retinal tears treated with laser retinopexy and cryoretinopexy. The study sought to identify whether there is a difference in ERM formation prevalence between these 2 treatments. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, chart review study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeking treatment at a private practice institution (The Retina Institute, St. Louis, Missouri) over a 10-year period between 2006 and 2016 for the evaluation and treatment of a retinal tear. METHODS: A chart review was conducted comprising all patients undergoing procedures for Current Procedural Terminology codes 67141 (prophylaxis of retinal detachment, cryotherapy) and 67145 (prophylaxis of retinal detachment, photocoagulation) and patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification, diagnosis code of 362.56 (macular puckering), who underwent procedures identified with Current Procedural Terminology codes 67141 and 67145. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Epiretinal membrane development, time between treatment and ERM development, and surgical intervention for ERM progression. RESULTS: A total of 2257 eyes underwent treatment for retinal breaks with 1655 eyes treated by laser retinopexy and 602 eyes treated by cryoretinopexy. The mean age of the cryoretinopexy group was 59.4±1.5 years and in the laser retinopexy group was 61.4±0.8 years. A total of 74 patients (3.2%) demonstrated an ERM after treatment for a retinal tear during an 11-year period (2006-2016). A total of 26 cryoretinopexy eyes (4.32%) and 48 laser retinopexy eyes (2.90%) demonstrated an ERM after treatment of retinal breaks (P = 0.094). The average time to ERM development was 11.5 months for the cryoretinopexy group and 12 months in the laser retinopexy group (P = 0.878). Seven ERMs progressed to requiring surgical intervention: 2 in the cryoretinopexy group and 5 in the laser retinopexy group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to ERM progression resulting in surgical intervention (P = 0.707). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of retinal breaks with either cryoretinopexy or laser retinopexy showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence, timing, or severity of ERM formation between these treatment methods.