Subject(s)
Family Practice , Internship and Residency , Curriculum , Family Practice/education , HumansABSTRACT
Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the U.S. and has increased in prevalence during the past 15 years. Patients who attempt suicide are more likely to have contact with their primary care provider than a mental health provider in the month before attempting suicide, highlighting the need for competency in suicide ideation (SI) assessment. The Communications Skills for Health Professionals is an interprofessional course involving first-year medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Specific instruction regarding assessment of SI was delivered through an online module and later practiced by students with standardized patients (SP). A final Objective Structured Clinical Examination featured an SP with depression, but without SI, though an assessment of SI was indicated. Three hundred fifty six interviews were reviewed and 55.1% (196/356) of students assessed for SI. Across professions, 65.5% (93/142) of medical students, 52.5% (32/61) of nursing students, and 46.4% (71/153) of pharmacy students performed an assessment. Medical students' SI assessment was highest across the groups (p = 0.001), while pharmacy students' SI assessment was lowest (p = 0.004). Results suggest that additional educational strategies should be developed and implemented to increase SI assessment performance in all professions, but especially in pharmacy students.
Subject(s)
Education, Professional/methods , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide , Communication , Education, Medical/methods , Education, Nursing/methods , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Patient Simulation , Risk Assessment , United StatesABSTRACT
Objective. To evaluate the impact of an interprofessional blended learning course on medical and pharmacy students' patient-centered interpersonal communication skills and to compare precourse and postcourse communication skills across first-year medical and second-year pharmacy student cohorts. Methods. Students completed ten 1-hour online modules and participated in five 3-hour group sessions over one semester. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) were administered before and after the course and were evaluated using the validated Common Ground Instrument. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to examine pre/postcourse domain scores within and across professions. Results. Performance in all communication skill domains increased significantly for all students. No additional significant pre/postcourse differences were noted across disciplines. Conclusion. Students' patient-centered interpersonal communication skills improved across multiple domains using a blended learning educational platform. Interview abilities were embodied similarly between medical and pharmacy students postcourse, suggesting both groups respond well to this form of instruction.
Subject(s)
Communication , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Interprofessional Relations , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Students, Medical , Students, Pharmacy , Clinical Competence , Humans , Patient Simulation , TeachingABSTRACT
This article provides answers to many of the common questions that medical students ask about the specialty of family medicine. It describes the crucial role that family physicians have in the evolving health care environment, the scope of practice, the diverse career opportunities available, the education and training of family physicians, the economic realities of a career in family medicine, why the future is so bright for family medicine, and why family physicians are passionate about their work.
Subject(s)
Career Choice , Family Practice/education , Physicians, Family/education , Schools, Medical , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , HumansSubject(s)
Breast Feeding , Family Practice , Health Promotion , Maternal-Child Health Centers , Societies, Medical , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Infant, Newborn , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Physician's Role , Postnatal Care , Pregnancy , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies have described the aggregate results of federal funding for health professions education at the national level, but analysis of the long-term impact of institutional participation in these programs has been limited. PURPOSE: To describe and assess federally supported curricular innovations at East Tennessee State University designed to promote family medicine and nurse practitioner graduate interest in rural and underserved populations. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of a survey to determine practice locations of nurse practitioner graduates (1992-2002) and graduates of 3 family medicine residencies (1978-2002). Graduates' (N = 656) practice locations were documented using specific federal designations relating to health professions shortages and rurality. RESULTS: Overall, 83% of family medicine residency and 80% of nurse practitioner graduates selected practice locations in areas with medically underserved or health professions shortage designations; 48% of family physicians and 38% of nurse practitioners were in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates who study in an educational setting with a mission-driven commitment to rural and community health and who participate in curricular activities designed to increase their experience with rural and underserved populations choose, in high numbers, to care for these populations in their professional practice.
