Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Decision Trees , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , France , Health Planning Guidelines , Humans , Mastectomy , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Reference Standards , ResearchABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical speciality societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: Produce clinical practice guidelines for the management and shipment of histological and cytopathological cancer specimens using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: The FNCLCC designated the group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, then validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1/ High-quality transmission of information between professionals is essential to the management of cancer specimens in order to assure high-quality diagnosis and evaluation of prognostic factors; 2/ Written procedures concerning sample shipment, handling, storage, registration, tracking and fixation exist; these procedures, as well as the necessary shipping material, will be sent to all clinical services involved; 3/ When possible, fresh, unfractionated, oriented surgical samples will be submitted to the same histological and cytopathological laboratory; 4/ Samples collected for extemporaneous examination, freezing or cell culture must be shipped immediately under appropriate storage conditions; 5/ Once frozen, samples can be stored in a deep freezer at temperatures of -80 degrees C or below, or kept in liquid nitrogen; 6/ Fixing tissues shortly after sample collection is essential to prevent cell lysis; 7/ Computerised systems will be used to assure correct specimen registration and tracking in histological and cytopathological laboratories.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/pathology , Specimen Handling/standards , HumansSubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Decision Making , Decision Trees , Female , France , Humans , Mammography , Mastectomy , Physical ExaminationABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the content of the anatomic and surgical pathology or cytopathology reports in field of oncology. METHODS: Data were identified either by searching on Medline or via members of the expert groups personal references lists. When the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted to 49 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the composition of the anatomic and surgical pathology or cytopathology reports in oncology are 1/ The reports must contain the identification of the pathologist, of the patient and of the specimen, a gross description for the surgical specimen, eventually a microscopic description, the diagnosis, all the elements essential for establishing the prognosis and for the clinical care, and a conclusion. 2/ The reports could contain some comments. 3/ The reports must be brief, precise, clear, homogeneous and ideally standardised, in order to be comprehensible for all the clinicians and the pathologists.
Subject(s)
Medical Records/standards , Neoplasms/pathology , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Pathology, Surgical/standards , Cytodiagnosis/standards , Humans , PrognosisABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate practice guidelines for difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology in cancer patients. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations to prevent and reduce the number of difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: The main recommendations to detect lesions associated with difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: The main recommendations to solve difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are:
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/pathology , Pathology/standards , Diagnosis, Differential , France , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health CareABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/standards , Adult , Aged , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Clinical Trials as Topic , Europe/epidemiology , Expert Testimony , Female , France , Humans , Lymphatic Irradiation/adverse effects , Lymphatic Irradiation/standards , Lymphatic Metastasis , Lymphedema/etiology , Mastectomy/methods , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 95 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer are: 1) Palliative care has been defined in a consensual way and is governed by the law (standard). Nutritional support is a palliative care which aim is to maintain and restore the "well-being" of the patient (standard). 2) Digestive symptoms and nutritional troubles are frequently noted in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). Karnofsky index (KPS) and performance status (PS) are functional scores with a prognostic value and have to be used (standard, level of evidence B2). 3) Anorexia has a bad predictive value in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) In France, patients with advanced or terminal cancer are referred to medical institutions, palliative care units or remained at home (standard). Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (standard). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important and physicians have to pay attention for their opinions (standard). 5) Dietetic counseling can help patients to improve their alimentation and its drawbacks (standard). 6) Palliative nutritional care often includes medicinal treatments (standard). 7) Artificial nutrition can slow down nutritional degradation, avoid dehydration and improve quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer (especially head and neck cancer for enteral nutrition and digestive occlusions for parenteral nutrition) and unable to eat adapted meals (standard, level of evidence C). 8) When life expectancy is below 3 months with a KPS 3/4 50% (or PS > 2), artificial nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 9) The assessment of nutritional care in patients with advanced or terminal cancer has to include functional scores measurement, quality of life and satisfaction degree of the patient and/or their family (standard, expert agreement).
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Nutritional Support , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Terminal Care , Adult , Aged , Anorexia/etiology , Anorexia/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, involves a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, some French public university and general hospitals and private Clinics and medical scientific societies. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts to produce the draft guidelines which are then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for hospital catering for cancer patient using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by a literature search of Medline and the reference lists of experts in the groups. After the guidelines were drafted, they were validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) While taking into consideration the specific needs of cancer patients, the dietician is responsible for the hygiene, the sanitary quality of alimentation, the equilibrium and nutritional quality of the hospital catering. 2) Ordering and distribution of meals, and clearing up afterwards contribute to the quality of hospital catering and the personnel who do this should have time and be willing to listen to the patients. 3) The ordering of meals should be adapted to individual patient's requirements and must take into account the patient's medication. 4) The method of transporting the food chosen by the institution (cold or warm method) should be respected. The personnel responsible should receive regular and specific training to use the method correctly. 5) The intake of patients with nutritional follow-up should be reliably and reproducibly evaluated by the personnel after every meal. 6) Patient satisfaction should be assessed once a year and the results of this assessment used to improve the quality of hospital catering. 7) The dietician is the interface between the accounts department, the medical wards, the hospital catering department and the patients.
Subject(s)
Dietetics , Food Service, Hospital/standards , Neoplasms/complications , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Aged , Humans , Hygiene , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality ControlABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993 is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology in cancer patients. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 71 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations to prevent and reduce the number of difficult diagnoses in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) The development of quality insurance programs with use of written procedures in each pathology laboratory (standard). 2) The knowledge of clinical data in order to explain surgical pathology or cytopathology results (standard). 3) The availability of complementary patient informations (radiologic data . . .) can be useful to explain surgical pathology or cytopathology results (option). The main recommendations to detect lesions associated with difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) Tumor types known as potential difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology should be reviewed by a second pathologist. 2) The systematic second reviewing for every case is expensive but has to be done when the difficulty is know (sarcoma, lymphoma . . .) by experienced pathologists. The main recommendations to solve difficult diagnosis in surgical pathology or cytopathology are: 1) Block recuts, use of special techniques (immunocytohistochemistry and molecular biology), additional data from clinicians, second opinion by a local pathologist, or new specimen can be required for establishing the diagnosis (options). 2) Outside second opinion by expert pathologist has to be considered once the other steps did not allow to establish surgical or cytopathology diagnosis (recommendations, expert agreement).
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Quality ControlABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in thyroid cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 55 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) Thyroglobulin is a serum tumor marker for the monitoring of operated thyroid differentiated neoplasms (standard). 2) It is essential to know if the patient is under TSH stimulation or under thyroid suppression therapy to interpret thyroglobulin results (standard). 3) Thyroglobulin assay must be performed regularly during the monitoring of differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2), should be coupled with the measurement of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies concentration using a sensitive method (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) Thyroglobulin assay should not be performed to detect or diagnose differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) The methods used to assay thyroglobulin must have a limit of detection lower than 3 mug.l- 1 (standard, expert agreement). 6) Calcitonin is a marker for medullary thyroid cancer (standard). 7) Its assay, associated with RET gene study if indicated, enables medullary thyroid cancer to be diagnosed. 8) The pentagastrin test is essential to diagnose familial forms of medullary thyroid cancer. 9) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 10) Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic-antigen are serum markers for the monitoring of medullary thyroid cancer and allow the detection of recurrent disease (standard).
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Thyroid Neoplasms/blood , Antibodies, Neoplasm/blood , Autoantibodies/blood , Calcitonin/blood , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood , Epitopes/immunology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Radioimmunoassay , Reference Values , Review Literature as Topic , Thyroglobulin/blood , Thyroglobulin/immunology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, Cancerlit, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 72 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for home parenteral or enteral nutrition in adult cancer patients are: 1) Home parenteral or enteral nutrition concerns cancer patients with malnutrition or with inadequate/impossible oral intake, during therapy of because of therapeutic after-effects (standard). Same indications apply for home and hospital artificial nutrition (standard). 2) Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (oncologists, nutritionists, and pain specialists), and this follow-up will make treatment adaptations according to the nutritional status possible (recommendation, expert agreement). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important (standard). 3) The benefit of home parenteral or enteral nutrition on the quality of life of terminally ill patients (vs. hydration) has not been demonstrated. When life expectancy is below 3 months, and the Karnofsky index below 50, the drawbacks of home artificial nutrition are more important than its advantages. In this case, home parenteral or enteral nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 4) Prospective clinical trials are recommended to evaluate the impact of home nutrition on quality of life in cancer patients (expert agreement). 5) The use of educational booklets that mention the telephone number of a referent health care and what to do when a problem happens (e.g. fever on home parenteral nutrition) is recommended (expert agreement). In France, patients should be referred to authorized home parenteral nutrition centres (recommendation, expert agreement).
