Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 38(4): 446-456, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36681949

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) is a contributor to costs and resource utilization. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, clinical, surgical, and institutional variables that influence LOS after elective surgery for thoracolumbar degenerative pathology. The secondary objective was to examine variability in LOS and institutional strategies used to decrease LOS. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from a multicentric cohort enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) between January 2015 and October 2020 who underwent elective thoracolumbar surgery (discectomy [1 or 2 levels], laminectomy [1 or 2 levels], and posterior instrumented fusion [up to 5 levels]). Prolonged LOS was defined as LOS greater than the median. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with prolonged LOS for each procedure. A survey was sent to the principal investigators of the participating healthcare institutions to understand institutional practices that are used to decrease LOS. RESULTS: A total of 3700 patients were included (967 discectomies, 1094 laminectomies, and 1639 fusions). The median LOSs for discectomy, laminectomy, and fusion were 0.0 (IQR 1.0), 1.0 (IQR 2.0), and 4.0 (IQR 2.0) days, respectively. On multivariable analysis, predictors of prolonged LOS for discectomy were having more leg pain, higher Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, symptom duration more than 2 years, having undergone an open procedure, occurrence of an adverse event (AE), and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). Predictors of prolonged LOS for laminectomy were increased age, living alone, higher ODI scores, higher BMI, open procedures, longer operative time, AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). For posterior instrumented fusion, predictors of prolonged LOS were older age, living alone, more comorbidities, higher ODI scores, longer operative time, AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). The laminectomy group had the largest variability in LOS (SD 4.4 days, range 0-133 days). Three hundred fifty-four patients (22%) had an LOS above the 75th percentile. Ten institutions (53%) had either Enhanced Recovery After Surgery or standardized protocols in place. CONCLUSIONS: Among the factors identified in this study, worse baseline ODI scores, experiencing AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols aimed at reducing LOS were predictive of prolonged LOS in all surgical groups. The laminectomy group had the largest variability in LOS.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay , Treatment Outcome , Spinal Fusion/methods , Canada/epidemiology
2.
Trials ; 17(1): 235, 2016 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27150916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most frequent reason for cranial neurosurgical consultation. There is no widely accepted medical treatment for this condition. Herein, we present the protocol for the Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in Chronic Subdural Hematomas (TRACS) trial aiming at determining whether TXA can increase the rate of CSDH resolution following conservative management, lower the number of required surgical procedures and decrease the rate of CSDH recurrence following surgical evacuation. METHODS: TRACS is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-design, placebo-controlled, phase IIB study designed to provide preliminary efficacy data as well as feasibility, safety and incidence data required to plan a larger definitive phase III trial. Consecutive patients presenting with a diagnosis of chronic subdural hematoma will be screened for eligibility. Exclusion criteria include: specific risk factors for thromboembolic disease, anticoagulant use or contraindication to TXA. A total of 130 patients will be randomized to receive either 750 mg of TXA daily or placebo until complete radiological resolution of the CSDH or for a maximum of 20 weeks. CSDH volume will be measured on serial computed tomography (CT) scanning. Cognitive function tests, quality of life questionnaires as well as functional autonomy assessments will be performed at enrollment, at 10 weeks following randomization and at 3 months following treatment cessation. During the treatment period, patients will undergo standard CSDH management with surgery being performed at the discretion of the treating physician. If surgery is performed, the CSDH and its outer membrane will be sampled for in vitro analysis. The primary outcome is the rate of CSDH resolution by 20 weeks without intervening unplanned surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes include: CSDH volume, incidence of surgical evacuation procedures, CSDH recurrence, cognitive functions, functional autonomy, quality of life, incidence of complications and length of hospital stay. Planned subgroup analyses will be performed for conservatively versus surgically managed subjects and highly versus poorly vascularized CSDH. DISCUSSION: CSDH is a frequent morbidity for which an effective medical treatment has yet to be discovered. The TRACS trial will be the first prospective study of TXA for CSDH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT ID: NCT02568124 .


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/drug therapy , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Protocols , Cognition , Double-Blind Method , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/diagnosis , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/physiopathology , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/psychology , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Neurosurgical Procedures , Quality of Life , Quebec , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Research Design , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 142: 48-53, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26808078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem and a leading cause of worldwide mortality and morbidity. Although effective evidence-based guidelines are available to help with management, the first question clinicians and family face is whether or not it is appropriate to intervene at all. To facilitate prognostic assessment and family counseling, we developed mobile application integrating validated TBI prognostic models. METHODS: The medical literature was reviewed to identify existing and validated prognostic models of mortality and morbidity following TBI. After approbation by the selected original model authors, a mobile application incorporating these models was developed. RESULTS: Of more than 100 published models, we identified the MRC CRASH trial-derived models as the most appropriate TBI prognosis tools for mobile use. These were integrated into an application we called "TBI Prognosis Calculator", which allows quick and interactive estimation of 14-days mortality and 6-months mortality and morbidity using demographic, clinical and radiologic variables. The application was programmed both for iOS-and Android-compatible devices and released as free applications in the platforms' respective distribution channels. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt and accurate prognosis estimation in TBI is promising. Mobile applications have the potential to enable easier and quicker point-of-care access to validated models, providing additional information to improve management and family counseling. We anticipate that clinicians will find "TBI Prognosis Calculator" useful as an adjunct in their prognostic assessment and family counseling.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/mortality , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Databases, Factual , Humans , Mobile Applications , Morbidity , Point-of-Care Systems , Prognosis
4.
J Neurosurg ; 121 Suppl: 69-74, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25434939

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Optimal case management after surgical removal of brain metastasis remains controversial. Although postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been shown to prevent local recurrence and decrease deaths, this modality can substantially decrease neurocognitive function and quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can theoretically achieve the same level of local control with fewer side effects, although studies conclusively demonstrating such outcomes are lacking. To assess the effectiveness and safety profile of tumor bed SRS after resection of brain metastasis, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of 110 patients who had received such treatment at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke. They designed the study to identify risk factors for local recurrence and placed special emphasis on factors that could potentially be addressed. METHODS: Patients who had received treatment from 2004 through 2013 were included if they had undergone surgical removal of 1 or more brain metastases and if the tumor bed was treated by SRS regardless of the extent of resection or prior WBRT. All cases were retrospectively analyzed for patient and tumor-specific factors, treatment protocol, adverse outcomes, cavity outcomes, and survival for as long as follow-up was available. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for local recurrence and predictors of increased survival times. RESULTS: Median patient age at first SRS treatment was 58 years (range 37-84 years). The most frequently diagnosed primary tumor was non-small cell lung cancer. The rate of gross-total resection was 81%. The median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 90%. Tumor bed SRS was performed at a median of 3 weeks after surgery. Median follow-up and survival times were 10 and 11 months, respectively. Actuarial local control of the cavity at 12 months was 73%; median time to recurrence was 6 months. According to multivariate analysis, risk factors for recurrence were a longer surgery-to-SRS delay (HR 1.625, p = 0.003) and a lower maximum radiation dose delivered to the cavity (HR 0.817, p = 0.006). Factors not associated with increased recurrence were subtotal or piecemeal resections, prior WBRT, histology of the primary tumor, and larger cavity volume. No factors predictive of survival were identified. Symptomatic radiation-induced enhancement occurred in 6% of patients and leptomeningeal dissemination in 11%. Pathologically confirmed radiation-induced necrosis occurred in 1 (0.9%) patient. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant tumor bed SRS after the resection of brain metastasis is a valuable alternative to adjuvant WBRT. Risk factors for local recurrence are lower maximum radiation dose and a surgery-to-SRS delay longer than 3 weeks. Outcomes were not worse for patients who had undergone prior WBRT and subtotal or piecemeal resections. Pending the results of prospective randomized controlled trials, the authors' study supports the safety and efficacy of adjuvant SRS after resection of brain metastasis. SRS should be performed as early as possible, ideally within 3 weeks of the surgery.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiosurgery/mortality , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Early Diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Neurosurg ; 117 Suppl: 175-80, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23205807

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) there is a high incidence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and outcomes after treatment seem inferior to those in patients suffering from idiopathic TN. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with MS-related TN after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) and compare them with those obtained using percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (PRGR). METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 45 patients with MS-related TN. The first procedure undertaken was GKS in 27 patients and PRGR in 18 patients. Pain had been present for a median of 60 months (range 12-276 months) in patients who underwent GKS and 48 months (range 12-240 months) in patients who underwent PRGR. The following outcome measures were assessed in both groups of patients: pain relief (using the Barrow Neurological Institute [BNI] Pain Scale), procedure-related morbidity, time to pain relief and recurrence, and subsequent procedures that were performed. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 39 months (range 13-69 months) in the GKS group and 38 months (range 2-75 months) in the PRGR group. Reasonable pain control (BNI Pain Scale Scores I-IIIb) was noted in 22 patients (81.5%) who underwent GKS and in 18 patients (100%) who underwent PRGR. For patients who underwent GKS, the median time to pain relief was 6 months; for those who underwent PRGR, pain relief was immediate. In the GKS group 12 patients required subsequent procedures (3 patients for absence of response and 9 patients for pain recurrence), whereas in the PRGR group 6 patients required subsequent procedures (all for pain recurrence). As of the last follow-up, complete or reasonable pain control was finally achieved in 23 patients (85.2%) in the GKS group and in 16 patients (88.9%) in the PRGR group. The morbidity rate was 22.2% in the GKS group (all due to sensory loss and paresthesia) and 66.7% in the PRGR group (mostly hypalgesia, with 2 patients having corneal reflex loss and 1 patient suffering from meningitis). CONCLUSIONS: Both GKS and PRGR are satisfactory strategies for treating MS-related TN. Gamma Knife surgery has a lower rate of sensory and overall morbidity than PRGR, but requires a delay before pain relief occurs. The authors propose that patients with extreme pain in need of fast relief should undergo PRGR. For other patients, both management strategies can lead to satisfactory pain relief, and the choice should be made based on patient preference and expectations.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/surgery , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Rhizotomy/methods , Trigeminal Neuralgia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Pain Measurement , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Trigeminal Neuralgia/complications
6.
Pain ; 147(1-3): 217-23, 2009 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19837512

ABSTRACT

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a rare neuropathic facial pain disorder. Two forms of TN, classical TN (CTN) and atypical TN (ATN), are reported and probably have different aetiologies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional integrity of the diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in (1) a group of patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN), (2) a group of patients with atypical trigeminal neuralgia (ATN), and (3) a group of healthy controls in order to determine if a descending pain modulation deficit could participate in the pathophysiology of TN pain. DNIC responses of 14 CTN patients, 14 ATN patients and 14 healthy controls were obtained by comparing thermode-induced facial heat pain scores before and after activating DNIC. DNIC was triggered using a standard counter-irritation paradigm (i.e., immersion of the arm in painfully cold water). General sensitivity to pain was also evaluated by measuring mechanical pain thresholds over 18 points located outside the trigeminal territory. Healthy participants and CTN patients showed a 21% and 16% reduction in thermode-induced pain following the immersion, respectively (all p-values <.01), whereas ATN patients experienced no change (p=.57). ATN patients also had more tender points (mechanical pain thresholds<4.0kg) than CTN and healthy controls (all p-values <.05). Taken together, these results suggest that the underlying physiopathology differs between CTN and ATN and that a deficit in descending inhibition may further contribute to the pain experienced by patients with ATN.


Subject(s)
Neural Inhibition/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain/etiology , Trigeminal Neuralgia/classification , Trigeminal Neuralgia/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cold Temperature/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Physical Stimulation/methods , Thermosensing/physiology , Touch/physiology
7.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 33(1): 86-91, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16583728

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: This study reports our findings in assessing in vivo tumour growth with magnetic resonance imaging using a commercial magnet and antenna in F98 implanted Fischer rats. A comparison of T1 gadolinium-enhanced coronal MR scans and pathology specimens in corresponding animals was accomplished. METHODS: One rat was used in serial experiments to establish adequate imaging parameters. Afterward, 12 animals implanted with F98 cells underwent a MR study following intervals spanning five, ten, 15 and 20 days on a 1.5T human Siemens. Using a small loop antenna, a coronal T1 weighted MRI scan with Gadolinium was performed. Images were analyzed and volumes of enhancing tumour were calculated. The animals were sacrificed after the imaging procedure and brain were harvested and processed in pathology. Pathology specimens and MR images were analyzed using image processing software. One hematoxylin + eosin (H&E) slide per specimen was compared to the corresponding MR slice depicting the largest area of enhancement. RESULTS: The MR enhancement areas obtained were 2.18 mm2, 8.25 mm2, 21.6 mm2 and 23.17 mm2 at five, ten, 15 and 20 days. Tumour margin measurements on pathologic samples produced areas of 0.29 mm2, 4.43 mm2, 8.3 mm2, and 12.9 mm2 at five, ten, 15 and 20 days respectively. CONCLUSION: The T1-enhancing images constantly overestimated the tumour bulk on H&E. This phenomenon is explained by enhancement of the brain around tumour, the extra-axial tumour growth, and a shrinking factor of 17% related to the fixation process. Nonetheless, the radiological tumour growth paralleled the histological samples. This technology is thus suitable to follow tumour growth in F98 implanted rats.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Animals , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Gadolinium , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...