Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(1): 76-82, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21360591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reported adverse events (RAEs) are relatively common in the acute hospital and are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Dementia is increasing in hospital in-patients, however there have been few studies exploring risk factors for RAEs, in particular cognitive impairment and dementia. Our objective was to identify the prevalence of RAEs in older acute medical inpatients and associated demographic, clinical or cognitive risk factors. METHOD: A longitudinal cohort study set on acute medical wards in a large general hospital. We recruited 710 people aged over 70 years undergoing emergency medical admission. Dementia was diagnosed using operationalised DSM-IV criteria. Patients were assessed using standardised tools including the Confusion Assessment Method, mini-mental state examination, the Functional Assessment Staging scale, the APACHE scale and Charlson co-morbidity index. Data on adverse events was supplied independently by the hospital clinical risk department. RESULTS: 8.6% (95% CI 6.4-10.6) of patients experienced an RAE; 5.9% (95% CI 4.2-7.6) were patient-related and 2.7% (95% CI 1.5-3.8) system-related (incidence rate for all RAEs was 2.1 (95% CI 1.7-2.8)) per person year of hospital admission. Median length of admission was 8 days (inter-quartile range 4-17 days). Patient-related RAEs were associated with male gender, delirium, mild/moderate cognitive impairment and a FAST score of 2-6. Overall, 11.1% died during the admission-this was not associated with experiencing an RAE. Staff comments on incident forms indicated an apparent lack of understanding of the impact of cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: RAEs were common and associated with risk factors identifiable at admission.


Subject(s)
Delirium/epidemiology , Dementia/epidemiology , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals, General/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 17(1): 31-40, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15945590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with dementia often receive poor end-of-life care, with inadequate pain control and without access to the palliative care services that patients with cancer are offered. This has been identified as an area of need in recent UK. Government reports and by the Alzheimer's Society (UK). Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the scientific literature regarding the efficacy of a palliative care model in patients with dementia. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out to identify controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of palliative care in patients with dementia. Data sources included were Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, AMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database and the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe. Other data was sourced from hand searches of papers identified on electronic databases and review articles. RESULTS: The search identified 30 review articles, but only four papers were eligible for full appraisal and only two of these met the full criteria for inclusion. These papers gave equivocal evidence of the efficacy for a palliative model of care in dementia. CONCLUSION: Despite the increased interest in palliative care for patients with dementia there is currently little evidence on which to base such an approach. This may in part be due to the ethical difficulties surrounding such research, prognostic uncertainty in clinicians and the lack of clear outcome measures for patients who are unable to express their needs or wishes. Further systematic research is urgently needed to educate an important and developing area of clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Dementia/psychology , Dementia/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Aged , Humans , Severity of Illness Index
4.
Clin Lab Manage Rev ; 9(5): 430-2, 434-9, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10152578

ABSTRACT

Health-care organizations are continuing to seek effective methods of "downsizing" or "rightsizing" their workforce in response to economic pressures imposed by local and national health-care reform. Staff reductions often appear haphazard or reactionary and typically include an "across-the-board" methodology to achieve a predetermined financial goal. In contrast, review of the literature suggests that chances of success improve when the approach is more thoughtful and based on sound principles. A key component of all successful strategies is proper sizing and restructuring of the management staff. This article presents one possible model that allows an organization to rationally assess management structure and carry out an effective downsizing strategy. The process considers the number of management layers in the organization, the number of individuals a manager supervises (span of control), and the relative complexity of the work performed. Critical to success is an effective training component to educate "surviving" managers on techniques needed to "do more with less."


Subject(s)
Hospital Administrators , Hospital Restructuring , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Employment , Humans , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Planning Techniques , Psychology, Industrial , Workforce
5.
Br J Psychiatry ; 164(3): 396-402, 1994 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8199793

ABSTRACT

Ninety-six people of pensionable age from an inner-London electoral ward who had been identified by short-CARE screening as having 'probable pervasive depression' were interviewed further to ascertain their GMS-AGECAT and self-CARE status, comorbid features, and current primary-care psychiatric management. Estimated incidence rates of 30.8 per 1000 per year for 'probable pervasive depression' and 15.4 per 1000 per year for GMS diagnostic depression were calculated using results from a short-CARE screen in 1988. Among GMS diagnostic depression cases, anxiety was the major psychiatric comorbid feature (95%) and organic features were uncommon (8.4%). Of 66 self-CARE cases, 48 (73%) were also GMS-AGECAT cases; of 24 self-CARE non-cases, 15 (62.5%) were not GMS-AGECAT cases. Among subjects who had 'probable pervasive depression', 38% said that they had declared their symptoms to their general practitioner. Only 14% of subjects were prescribed antidepressants; 24% were prescribed hypnotics. Half the GMS-AGECAT-case subjects who stated that they had declared to their general practitioner were on specific therapy. Screening for depression and health education aimed at increasing psychological declaration are seen as ways forward in the management of this depression.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Health Promotion , Humans , London/epidemiology , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Public Health , Somatoform Disorders/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...