Change motivation and mindfulness in individual psychotherapy: Examining a sample of adult outpatients with depression and/or anxiety.

OBJECTIVES: Existing literature has demonstrated that both motivation to change and mindfulness are associated with therapy outcomes in samples with mental disorders. Between the constructs of mindfulness and motivation to change occurs some theoretical-related and empirical overlap. However, it is still little known about the association of these two constructs. For this reason, we investigated the relationship of motivation to change and mindfulness in a sample of 116 adult outpatients with a primary diagnosis of depression or anxiety. METHODS: An outpatient sample of 116 depressive and/or anxious patients filled in the German short version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-S) and the German version of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) before the start of cognitive-behavioral therapy (pre) and after the 25th cognitive-behavioral therapy session (post). To assess the association between change motivation and mindfulness, we calculated correlations, hierarchical regressions and cross-lagged panel models (CLPM). RESULTS: Several positive and negative significant correlations at the premeasurement time point, at the postmeasurement time point, and over time (from pre to postmeasurement time point) demonstrated a relation between the KIMS and the URICA-S. Hierarchical regression analyses and CLPM pointed towards relations between mindfulness and change motivation over time and in both directions for some subscales of the KIMS and the URICA-S. CONCLUSION: A bidirectional relation between motivation to change and mindfulness was supported in our naturalistic psychotherapy setting for several subscales. For a better understanding of the interconnection between the two constructs, future research should focus on the application of interventions to improve either mindfulness or motivation to change in psychotherapy. Additionally, the interactional effects of mindfulness and change motivation on therapy outcomes should be investigated.

[Change Mechanisms in Group Therapy: A Questionnaire to Measure Therapeutic Perspectives]. / Wirkfaktoren in der Gruppentherapie: Fragebogen zur Messung der therapeutischen Perspektive.

Group therapy was shown to be an effective and economic intervention. To date few instruments exist to empirically assess mechanisms of therapeutic change in group therapy. The Group Therapy Process Questionnaire for Therapists (FEPiG-T) measuring change mechanisms in group therapy as viewed from the perspectives of therapists was developed and validated in this study based on the conceptualizations of Grawe,Yalom and Bordin and in reference to the previously developed measure for patients. The FEPiG-T subscales show good internal consistencies and small to large correlations with convergent measures. Subscales at beginning of therapy correlated with improvement of interpersonal problems over time. Further associations with symptom scales remained more vague. However, intersections with the established version for patients allow routinely implemented evaluation of the 2 perspectives in clinical practice, but inevitably need careful interpretation where the instruments differ in their factor structure.

Heart Rate Variability in Individual Psychotherapy: Associations With Alliance and Outcome.

Heart rate variability (HRV) can be conceptualized as a marker of an individual's capability to adaptively respond to its environment and has been linked with mental health. Although conceptually and empirically linked to social behavior and thus relevant in the therapeutic setting, HRV is seldom investigated directly within therapy sessions. In the present examination, we aimed at addressing this research gap by assessing patients' and therapists' HRVs both ambulatory within therapy sessions and under resting conditions. Drawing on polyvagal theory, we hypothesized that higher in-session HRV is accompanied with higher therapeutic alliance ratings. Further, we expected baseline HRV to predict symptomatic outcome and to increase over the course of therapy. In a sample of 53 outpatients receiving 25 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy, we measured HRV, therapeutic alliance and depressive symptoms on four occasions. Multilevel modeling analyses demonstrated that patients with higher in-session high-frequency HRV rated the therapeutic alliance higher. Baseline HRV predicted symptomatic outcome and increased over the course of therapy. Possible explanations involve a link between in-session HRV and in-session behavior and should be investigated in future studies. The results highlight the usefulness of in-session HRV as a promising process variable in psychotherapy research.

Mindfulness and progressive muscle relaxation as standardized session-introduction in individual therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: There is scarce research on the effects of mindfulness in individual therapy. As many practitioners integrate mindfulness exercises into individual therapy, empirical evidence is of high clinical relevance. METHOD: We investigated the effects of a session-introducing intervention with mindfulness elements (SIIME) in a randomized, controlled design. The effects of SIIME on therapeutic alliance and symptomatic outcome were compared with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and treatment-as-usual (TAU) control conditions. The sample comprised 162 patients with anxiety and depression. RESULTS: Multilevel modeling revealed a significant symptom reduction and significant increase of alliance over the course of therapy. There were no significant time-condition interactions on outcome and alliance, indicating the comparable efficiency of all three treatment conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantage of SIIME versus PMR and TAU. Add-on mindfulness might not improve individual therapy related to alliance and outcome.

Effects of mindfulness exercises as stand-alone intervention on symptoms of anxiety and depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are currently well established in psychotherapy with meta-analyses demonstrating their efficacy. In these multifaceted interventions, the concrete performance of mindfulness exercises is typically integrated in a larger therapeutic framework. Thus, it is unclear whether stand-alone mindfulness exercises (SAMs) without such a framework are beneficial, as well. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effects of SAMs on symptoms of anxiety and depression. Systematic searching of electronic databases resulted in 18 eligible studies (n = 1150) for meta-analyses. After exclusion of one outlier SAMs had small to medium effects on anxiety (SMD = 0.39; CI: 0.22, 0.56; PI: 0.07, 0.70; p < .001, I2 = 18.90%) and on depression (SMD = 0.41; CI: 0.19, 0.64; PI: -0.05, 0.88; p < .001; I2 = 33.43%), when compared with controls. Summary effect estimates decreased, but remained significant when corrected for potential publication bias. This is the first meta-analysis to show that the mere, regular performance of mindfulness exercises is beneficial, even without being integrated in larger therapeutic frameworks.

Validation of the URICA-S in Group Therapy: Associations of Stages of Change with Therapeutic Factors and Treatment Outcome.

Stages of change could be driving forces to activate the realization of therapeutic factors and symptom change. Consequently, the aims of the present study were to investigate whether the stages of change concept is valid in group therapy settings shown by factor analysis, internal consistencies, and criterion validity. A total of 377 patients completed measures of stages of change, symptom change, and therapeutic factors. A confirmatory factor analysis replicated the stages of change factors for group therapy. Related to the criterion validity, stages of change demonstrated only low, non-significant associations with symptom change, but some stages of change were significant predictors of certain therapeutic factors. Further research is needed to explore whether a stronger focus on motivational stages of change could help to intensify the realization of therapeutic factors in group therapy.

[Change Factors in Group Therapy: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire]. / Wirkfaktoren in der Gruppentherapie: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens.

While the efficacy of group therapy is sufficiently confirmed, there is a research gap concerning relevant therapeutic processes. Particularly, there is a dearth of integrative instruments that assess a broad spectrum of group therapeutic change factors. Hence, the aim of the current investigation was the validation of the newly developed "Scale for the assessment of therapeutic processes in group therapy (FEPiG)" based on Grawe's general psychotherapy and Yalom's conception of change factors in group therapy. 303 Patients (110 outpatients, 193 inpatients) participated in the study and completed the FEPiG as well as established measures concerning group processes. The outpatients additionally received established questionnaires concerning clinical symptomatology and filled out all instruments at the beginning and end of treatment. Factor analysis demonstrated an excellent factor structure of the FEPiG, which corresponded to the theoretically predicted subscales. Internal consistencies of the FEPiG were good to excellent and correlated with established process measures, which indicated convergent validity. While the FEPiG change factors subscales at the beginning of therapy were not correlated with outcome, associations between increases in change factors across the course of therapy and symptom reduction could be demonstrated.