Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 31(7-8): 563-568, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456450

ABSTRACT

Doctors and medical students are working in a system which is affecting their mental wellbeing and their ability to provide the best possible care for patients. The British Medical Association conducted an online survey of doctors and medical students in October 2018. In total, 4347 responses were received and analysed. Doctors working the longest hours appear to be most vulnerable to psychological and emotional disturbance. Older and more senior doctors are most likely to report that their working environment has impacted on their condition. Medical students and junior doctors report the highest rate of having a formally diagnosed mental health condition in the last 12 months. This may be because they are in the vulnerable age group when psychiatric disorders start. Junior doctors were least likely to be aware of how to access help or support. Older doctors, those working as SAS (Staff, Associate Specialists and Specialty) doctors and overseas qualified doctors are most likely to say they have asked for support in managing a problem from their employer but that no support was provided. It is important to recognize that doctors, in spite of stress and poor wellbeing, continue to work hard, which has both advantages and disadvantages. These findings highlight that the environment in which doctors work, train, and study affects their mental health, and for this reason careful consideration needs to be given to the type and level of support provision available to them, as well as the ease of access and awareness of such support.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Mental Health , Physicians/psychology , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Schools, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young Adult
3.
J R Soc Med ; 101(2): 78-84, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18299627

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a sample of UK Armed Forces peacekeepers. The study also aimed to explore the influence of deploying without an established peer group (deployment status) upon health outcomes using an accepted diagnostic tool for PTSD (PCL-M) and an alternative measure of post-traumatic distress. DESIGN: Using a sub-sample of the King's military cohort we surveyed personnel that deployed on peacekeeping operations between 1991 and 2000 (n=1198). SETTING: Respondents' mean age was 36 years (min, 23 to max, 60) and 81% (n=964) were serving in the Armed Forces at the time of participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PTSD prevalence was determined in British military peacekeepers using the PLC-M (cut-offs 44 and 50), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and a composite brief measure of potential post traumatic symptomology, 'PostTraumatic Stress Reaction' (PTSR) for comparison. RESULTS: PTSD prevalence varied from 3.6 to 5.5%. Officers and married personnel were less likely to be cases. Neither gender, age or deployment status influenced PTSD prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD was an uncommon disorder in this sample of British military peacekeepers, with prevalence rates being lower than those reported by other nations. Deploying without an established peer group was not associated with developing PTSD. We postulate that differences in culture and operational practices may account for the lower rates of PTSD.


Subject(s)
Combat Disorders/epidemiology , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Warfare , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , United Kingdom
4.
Mil Med ; 171(8): 703-9, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16933809

ABSTRACT

The effects of the first 19 weeks of U.K. Parachute Regiment (PARA) training on upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) incidence and immune function (circulating leukocyte counts, lymphocyte subsets, lipopolysaccharide-stimulated neutrophil degranulation, and salivary immunoglobulin A concentrations) were investigated for 14 PARA recruits and 12 control subjects. No significant differences were reported between groups for the number or duration of URTIs, lymphocyte subsets, or salivary immunoglobulin A concentrations during training. URTI incidence was greater in the PARA group at weeks 2 and 3 (p < 0.05), coinciding with a decrease in circulating leukocyte and lymphocyte counts (p < 0.05). Neutrophil degranulation was similar in the PARA and control groups at weeks 0 and 19. Decreases in saliva flow rate occurred in the PARA group at week 15 and weeks 18 to 20 (p < 0.05). These results show a limited effect of PARA training on URTI incidence and immune function. The progressive decrease in saliva flow rate during PARA training may indicate an ensuing state of hypohydration.


Subject(s)
Exercise/physiology , Immune System/physiology , Military Personnel/education , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aviation/education , Energy Metabolism/physiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/analysis , Incidence , Leukocytes/physiology , Lipopolysaccharides/analysis , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Saliva/immunology , Teaching Materials , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Lancet ; 367(9524): 1731-41, 2006 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16731268

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the mental and physical health of UK military personnel who deployed to the 2003 war in Iraq and subsequent tours of duty in the country. METHODS: We compared health outcomes in a random sample of UK armed forces personnel who were deployed to the 2003 Iraq war with those in personnel who were not deployed. Participants completed a questionnaire covering the nature of the deployment and health outcomes, which included symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, common mental disorders, general wellbeing, alcohol consumption, physical symptoms, and fatigue. FINDINGS: The participation rate was 62.3% (n=4722) in the deployed sample, and 56.3% (n=5550) in the non-deployed sample. Differences in health outcomes between groups were slight. There was a modest increase in the number of individuals with multiple physical symptoms (odds ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.15-1.54). No other differences between groups were noted. The effect of deployment was different for reservists compared with regulars. In regulars, only presence of multiple physical symptoms was weakly associated with deployment (1.32; 1.14-1.53), whereas for reservists deployment was associated with common mental disorders (2.47, 1.35-4.52) and fatigue (1.78; 1.09-2.91). There was no evidence that later deployments, which were associated with escalating insurgency and UK casualties, were associated with poorer mental health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: For regular personnel in the UK armed forces, deployment to the Iraq war has not, so far, been associated with significantly worse health outcomes, apart from a modest effect on multiple physical symptoms. There is evidence of a clinically and statistically significant effect on health in reservists.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Mental Disorders/etiology , Military Personnel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Warfare , Cohort Studies , Humans , Iraq , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...