Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 121(19): 3465-71, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26079295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proteasome inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors each have activity in various B-cell malignancies and affect distinct cellular pathways. Their combination has demonstrated synergy in vitro and in mouse models. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial of combined temsirolimus and bortezomib in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) using a dosing scheme that was previously tested in multiple myeloma. The patients received bortezomib and temsirolimus weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 35-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 39 patients who received treatment, 3 achieved a complete response (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6%-21%), and 9 had a partial response (PR) (23%; 95% CI, 11%-39%). Thus, the overall response rate (12 of 39 patients) was 31% (95% CI, 17%-48%), and the median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.1-7.8 months; 2 months for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [n = 18], 7.5 months for those with mantle cell lymphoma [n = 7], and 16.5 months for those with follicular lymphoma [n = 9]). Two extensively treated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma achieved a complete response. There were no unexpected toxicities from the combination. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate that the combination of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and a proteasome inhibitor is safe and has activity in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell NHL. Further studies with this combination are warranted in specific subtypes of NHL.


Subject(s)
Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Male , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Wisconsin
2.
Invest New Drugs ; 32(1): 195-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23728919

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, having received 2 prior systemic regimens, and performance status 0-2. Patients took vorinostat 400 mg PO daily days 1-14 and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV day 1, 4, 8 and 11 in a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was 3-month progression free survival (3m-PFS), with a goal of at least 40 % of patients being free of progression at that time point. This study followed a two-stage minimax design. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the first stage. All patients had two prior lines of treatment. Patients received a median of two treatment cycles (range: 1-6) on study. There were no anti-tumor responses; stable disease was observed in 5 patients (27.8 %). Median PFS was 1.5 months, 3m-PFS rate 11.1 %, and median overall survival 4.7 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Two patients who had baseline taxane-related grade 1 peripheral neuropathy developed grade 3 neuropathy. The study was closed at its first interim analysis for lack of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib and vorinostat displayed minimal anti-tumor activity as third-line therapy in NSCLC. We do not recommend this regimen for further investigation in unselected patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Boronic Acids/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Hydroxamic Acids/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Pyrazines/therapeutic use , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Boronic Acids/adverse effects , Bortezomib , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Hydroxamic Acids/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pyrazines/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vorinostat
3.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 52(9): 1675-80, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21864042

ABSTRACT

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is challenging to manage, with a median survival of 3-5 years. While intensive strategies are often appropriate for younger patients, these approaches are often not appropriate for older patients. In 2006, we reported our initial results using modified R-hyperCVAD (rituximab with hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) with maintenance rituximab. The complete response rate was 64%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) 37 months. Herein, we update our results, now with a median follow-up of 62 months. The median PFS is unchanged and the median overall survival (OS) is 70 months. The proportion of patients surviving at 5 years is 62%, comparable to studies using intensive strategies in similar patient populations. No late toxicities were noted in our cohort. These long-term results suggest that the modified R-hyperCVAD regimen with maintenance rituximab is an excellent option for older patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/mortality , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pilot Projects , Remission Induction , Rituximab , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...