Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
3.
PLoS One ; 7(1): e30018, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22253862

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the impact of mass vaccination with adjuvanted vaccines (eventually 40% population coverage) and antivirals during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway, we fitted an age-structured SEIR model using data on vaccinations and sales of antivirals in 2009/10 in Norway to Norwegian ILI surveillance data from 5 October 2009 to 4 January 2010. We estimate a clinical attack rate of approximately 30% (28.7-29.8%), with highest disease rates among children 0-14 years (43-44%). Vaccination started in week 43 and came too late to have a strong influence on the pandemic in Norway. Our results indicate that the countermeasures prevented approximately 11-12% of potential cases relative to an unmitigated pandemic. Vaccination was found responsible for roughly 3 in 4 of the avoided infections. An estimated 50% reduction in the clinical attack rate would have resulted from vaccination alone, had the campaign started 6 weeks earlier. Had vaccination been prioritized for children first, the intervention should have commenced approximately 5 weeks earlier in order to achieve the same 50% reduction. In comparison, we estimate that a non-adjuvanted vaccination program should have started 8 weeks earlier to lower the clinical attack rate by 50%. In conclusion, vaccination timing was a critical factor in relation to the spread of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza. Our results also corroborate the central role of children for the transmission of A(H1N1) pandemic influenza.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Vaccination , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Basic Reproduction Number , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Norway/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Vaccine ; 27(37): 5133-41, 2009 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19567244

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study predicts long-term cervical cancer related population health and economic effects of introducing the HPV-vaccination for 12-year-old girls (and boys) in addition to current screening compared with screening only. METHOD: Health effects are predicted by a dynamic transmission model. Model results are used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in euro per life year gained (LYG) for a time-horizon between 2008 and 2060 from a public payer and a societal perspective. RESULTS: Vaccination of girls results a discounted ICER of euro 64,000/LYG and euro 50,000/LYG from a payer's and societal perspectives respectively. The additional vaccination of boys increases the ICER to euro 311,000 and euro 299,000/LYG respectively. Results were most sensitive to vaccination price, discount rate and time-horizon. CONCLUSION: HPV-vaccination for girls should be cost-effective when adopting a longer time-horizon and a societal perspective. Applying a shorter time frame and a payer's perspective or vaccinating boys may not be cost-effective without reducing the vaccine price.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Austria , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Models, Economic , Papillomavirus Infections/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...