Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 2024 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A rebound in myopia progression following cessation of atropine eyedrops has been reported, yet there is limited data on the effects of stopping 0.01% atropine compared to placebo control. This study tested the hypothesis that there is minimal rebound myopia progression after cessation of 0.01% atropine eyedrops, compared to a placebo. METHODS: Children with myopia (n = 153) were randomised to receive 0.01% atropine eyedrops or a placebo (2:1 ratio) daily at bedtime during the 2-year treatment phase of the study. In the third year (wash-out phase), all participants ceased eyedrop instillation. Participants underwent an eye examination every 6 months, including measurements of spherical equivalent (SphE) after cycloplegia and axial length (AL). Changes in the SphE and AL during the wash-out phase and throughout the 3 years of the study (treatment + wash-out phase) were compared between the treatment and control groups. RESULTS: During the 1-year wash-out phase, SphE and AL progressed by -0.41D (95% CI = -0.33 to -0.22) and +0.20 mm (95% CI = -0.46 to -0.36) in the treatment group compared to -0.28D (95% CI = 0.11 to 0.16) and +0.13 mm (95% CI = 0.18 to 0.21) in the control group. Progression in the treatment group was significantly faster than in the control group (p = 0.016 for SphE and <0.001 for AL). Over the 3-year study period, the cumulative myopia progression was similar between the atropine and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed evidence of rapid myopia progression following cessation of 0.01% atropine. Further investigations are warranted to ascertain the long-term effects of atropine eyedrops.

3.
Eye Contact Lens ; 49(4): 178-179, 2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585746
4.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 50(9): 1001-1012, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that 0.01% atropine eyedrops are a safe and effective myopia-control approach in Australian children. METHODS: Children (6-16 years; 49% Europeans, 18% East Asian, 22% South Asian, and 12% other/mixed ancestry) with documented myopia progression were enrolled into this single-centre randomised, parallel, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial and randomised to receive 0.01% atropine (n = 104) or placebo (n = 49) eyedrops (2:1 ratio) instilled nightly over 24 months (mean index age = 12.2 ± 2.5 and 11.2 ± 2.8 years, respectively). Outcome measures were the changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) from baseline. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline were -0.31D (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.39 to -0.22) and 0.16 mm (95%CI = 0.13-0.20) in the atropine group and -0.53D (95%CI = -0.66 to -0.40) and 0.25 mm (95%CI = 0.20-0.30) in the placebo group (group difference p ≤ 0.01). At 24 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline was -0.64D (95%CI = -0.73 to -0.56) and 0.34 mm (95%CI = 0.30-0.37) in the atropine group, and -0.78D (95%CI = -0.91 to -0.65) and 0.38 mm (95%CI = 0.33-0.43) in the placebo group. Group difference at 24 months was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). At 24 months, the atropine group had reduced accommodative amplitude and pupillary light response compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In Australian children, 0.01% atropine eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and had a modest myopia-control effect, although there was an apparent decrease in efficacy between 18 and 24 months, which is likely driven by a higher dropout rate in the placebo group.


Subject(s)
Atropine , Myopia , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Ophthalmic Solutions , Australia , Myopia/drug therapy , Refraction, Ocular , Disease Progression
5.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266909, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35417477

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Changes in retinal thickness are common in various ocular diseases. Transverse magnification due to differing ocular biometrics, in particular axial length, affects measurement of retinal thickness in different regions. This study evaluated the effect of axial length and refractive error on measured macular thickness in two community-based cohorts of healthy young adults. METHODS: A total of 2160 eyes of 1247 community-based participants (18-30 years; 23.4% myopes, mean axial length = 23.6mm) were included in this analysis. Macular thickness measurements were obtained using a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (which assumes an axial length of 24.385mm). Using a custom program, retinal thickness data were extracted at the 9 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) regions with and without correction for transverse magnificent effects, with the corrected measurements adjusting according to the participant's axial length. Linear mixed models were used to analyse the effect of correction and its interaction with axial length or refractive group on retinal thickness. RESULTS: The raw measures (uncorrected for axial length) underestimated the true retinal thickness at the central macula, while overestimating at most non-central macular regions. There was an axial length by correction interaction effect in all but the nasal regions (all p<0.05). For each 1mm increase in axial length, the central macular thickness is overestimated by 2.7-2.9µm while thicknesses at other regions were underestimated by 0.2-4.1µm. Based on the raw thickness measurements, myopes have thinner retinas than non-myopes at most non-central macular. However, this difference was no longer significant when the corrected data was used. CONCLUSION: In a community-based sample, the raw measurements underestimate the retinal thickness at the central macula and overestimate the retinal thickness at non-central regions of the ETDRS grid. The effect of axial length and refractive error on retinal thickness is reduced after correcting for transverse magnification effects resulting from axial length differences.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Macula Lutea , Myopia , Refractive Errors , Biometry , Humans , Macula Lutea/diagnostic imaging , Refraction, Ocular , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Young Adult
6.
Blood Press ; 29(6): 344-356, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460564

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We have summarized key studies regarding the assessment of subclinical macroangiopathic target organ damage (TOD) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). RESULTS: Although chronic complications resulting from hyperglycemia, in particular macroangiopathies, are still the first cause of death in T1DM, there has been growing recognition of the role of hypoglycemia in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Subclinical TOD diagnosis ensures early implementation of the complex management aiming at either partial reversal of these complications or at least its downturn. To better identify patients with early TODs, several non-invasive diagnostic techniques are employed, including the ultrasonographic assessment of the intima-media thickness (IMT), computed tomography (CT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement for arterial stiffness evaluation. Various studies reported that T1DM patients present an increased IMT. An increasing IMT fairly correlates with the cardiovascular (CV) events risk even after the adjustment to age, diabetes duration, quality of glucose control as well as the presence of hypertension, and chronic complications. Another, well established marker of the organ damage - CAC score is recommended by ACC/AHA guidelines to assess the overall CV risk in T1DM. Also, the arterial stiffness evaluation with PWV may further improve CV risk prediction, which has been reported in multiple studies including the Framingham Heart Study. CONCLUSIONS: There is shortage of data from prospective studies which could confirm the benefits of early treatment initiation based on the presence of the subclinical organ damage in T1DM. Most evidence comes from T2DM trials, where effective preventive measures were identified i.e.: smoking cessation, reasonable blood glucose control, efficacious hypertension treatment, and dyslipidemia management, as well as renoprotection. There is still a field for further research to see if routine assessment of asymptomatic vascular damage and early implementation of aggressive treatment would reduce mortality excess from CVD in T1DM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/diagnosis , Vascular Calcification/diagnosis , Calcium/analysis , Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , Computed Tomography Angiography , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/pathology , Diabetic Angiopathies/etiology , Diabetic Angiopathies/pathology , Humans , Risk Factors , Vascular Calcification/etiology , Vascular Calcification/pathology , Vascular Stiffness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...