Sequential administration of cisplatin-etoposide followed by topotecan in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity of the sequential administration of cisplatin-etoposide (PE) followed by topotecan (TOP) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with extensive stage SCLC received 4 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-3 every 21 days followed by 4 cycles of TOP 1.5 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-5 every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were entered in the study. Their median age was 63 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 5, 1 for 25 and 2 for 8 patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 32 for response to PE and 25 to TOP. Of the 38 patients receiving PE, 1 (3%) patient achieved complete response (CR) and 17 (45%) partial responses (PR) for an overall response rate to PE of 47% (95% confidence interval: 36.7-68.5%). Four (23.5%) of the 17 patients with PR after PE, achieved CR with TOP. None of the patients with stable or progressive disease after PE responded to TOP. The response rate of the 27 patients receiving TOP following PE was 15% (95% confidence interval: 1.4-28.2%). After a median follow up of 9 months, the median duration of response was 6.5 months, the time to tumor progression 6.5 months, the median survival 8.5 months and the 1-year survival 34%. A total of 136 cycles of PE and 89 cycles of TOP have been administered with a median of 4 cycles/patient for each regimen. There were 2 toxic deaths after PE associated with grade IV febrile neutropenia. Treatment delays due to toxicity occurred in 17 (12%) cycles of PE and 20 (22%) cycles of TOP while doses were reduced in 7 (5%) and 4 (4%) cycles, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 24, 2 and 3% of PE cycles and 21, 12 and 1% of TOP. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. The delivered dose intensity was 100% for PE and 93% for TOP. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential administration of TOP after PE is associated with manageable toxicity and may increase the number of CRs in patients with chemosensitive extensive stage SCLC. However, based on this data and the lack of survival benefit in a previous phase III study, the sequential regimen should not be used outside of a clinical trial.

Second-line treatment with vinorelbine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine-carboplatin (VNB-C) combination as a salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after or failing previous non-platinum, taxane-based treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. VNB 30 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1 and 8 and C 300 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 28 days. G-CSF (5 microg/kg per day s.c.) was used prophylactically on days 10-15 in case of grade 3-4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia after the first cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and all were evaluable for toxicity. In an intention-to-treat analysis, two (5%) complete and four (11%) partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 16% (95% CI, 4.49-28.84%). Eleven (30%) patients experienced disease stabilisation and 20 (54%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months, the median TTP was 9 months, and the median survival was 8.5 months. Patients with objective remission and stable disease had a statistically significant survival benefit over patients with disease progression. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in three (8%) and ten (27%) patients, respectively, and six cases (16%) were complicated with fever. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was documented in one (3%) patient. Non-hematological toxicity was mild, with grade 2 and 3 asthenia reported in 18 (48%) patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: VNB-C combination is well tolerated and retains a notable degree of activity in NSCLC patients progressing after previous non-platinum, taxane-based treatment. Moreover, it confers tumour growth control in a significant proportion of patients, and this seems to be associated with a survival benefit for them.

Vinorelbine-based regimens as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: two parallel multicenter phase II trials.

UNLABELLED: Two parallel phase II trials were conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine-ifosfamide (VNB-IFX) and vinorelbine-carboplatin (VNB-C) combinations as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients failing platinum-based front-line chemotherapy were enrolled in the VNB-IFX trial while patients failing non-platinum-containing chemotherapy were treated with VNB-C. Twenty-nine patients were treated with VNB-IFX [median age: 59 years; performance status, PS (WHO) 0--1: 72% and disease stage IV: 79%] and 37 with VNB-C [median age: 61 years; PS (WHO) 0--1: 51% and stage IV: 84%]. Patients received vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 and ifosfamide 1.6 g/m(2) i.v. on days 8--10 with uroprotective mesna, in cycles of 28 days. G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day s.c.) was administered prophylactically on days 11--16 or until hematological recovery. The VNB-C regimen consisted of carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response in the VNB-IFX trial and 29 in the VNB-C. Overall response rates (intent-to-treat analysis) were 3% (1 patient; duration of response: 3 months) for the VNB-IFX and 16% (median duration of response: 7.5 months) for the VNB-C combination. The median time to progression and survival for patients receiving VNB-IFX were 4.5 and 6 months (1-year survival: 19%), respectively; the corresponding values for VNB-C were 9.0 and 8.5 months (1-year survival: 38%). The median survival of patients achieving stable disease was 10 (VNB-IFX) and 14.5 (VNB-C) months. Grade 3--4 neutropenia occurred in 4 (13%) of the patients treated with VNB-IFX; all cases were complicated with fever. Grade 3--4 neutropenia was documented in 13 (35%) patients in the VNB-C trial; 6 (16%) developed neutropenic fever. There were no treatment-related deaths. Non-hematologic toxicity for the VNB-IFX and VNB-C regimens was mild with grade 2--3 peripheral neurotoxicity occurring in 3 (10%) and 7 (19%) patients, and grade 2--3 asthenia in 11 (38%) and 18 (48%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both combinations were associated with a tolerable toxicity profile. VNB-C demonstrated notable activity in patients previously treated with a taxane-based regimen, whilst VNB-IFX failed to produce a significant response rate in patients treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Stabilization of disease was associated with a favorable survival in both studies.