Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 45: 102274, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994353

ABSTRACT

Background: Tibial intramedullary nailing is a common method of fixation for fractures of the tibia, with several approaches described. Anterior knee pain is a common complication following nailing, but the reported incidence of knee pain varies in the literature between 10 % and 86 %. There is considerable variation in incidence between nailing techniques, with an exact aetiology still unknown. We investigated the reported incidence of anterior knee pain in patients undergoing tibial nailing using the semi-extended extra synovial (SEES) technique at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) in the UK. Methods: A retrospective review of tibial fractures treated with the SEES technique between December 2012 to February 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics, length of stay, union rates and re-operation rates. Primary outcomes were anterior knee pain rates and patient reported outcome measures (PROM), the Kujala Score. Secondary outcomes were rates of union and complications. Results: 55 fractures were identified in 53 patients. Male: Female ratio was 32:21. The average age was 45.5 years. 96 % were unilateral fractures; with 53 % being right-sided. 21(38 %) fractures were open. Prior to definitive nailing 21 fractures had temporary stabilisation with an external fixator (Ex-Fix) ± wound debridement whilst the rest received plaster backslab immobilisation. 13 of the open fractures required soft tissue cover. 75 % of patients had initial surgery (SEES Nailing/Ex-Fix) within 4 days. There was a 91 % union rate with a median time to full radiographic union of 14 months. One post-operative complication of wound dehiscence was recorded. The mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. 15 % of patients reported anterior knee pain in the postoperative follow-up period. The average Kujala PROM score was 85 (Range: 52-100). Conclusion/findings: The SEES technique had favourable PROM scores and displayed a lower incidence of anterior knee pain than the traditional infrapatellar approach. Knee pain rates were comparable to suprapatellar approaches without violating the knee joint. Disclosures: None.

2.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 84(10): 1-7, 2023 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37906073

ABSTRACT

Peroneal tendon dislocation or subluxation is an orthopaedic condition that usually occurs as a result of injury to the superior peroneal retinaculum. The peroneal muscles are located in the lateral compartment of the leg, and their tendons run in the retromalleolar groove anchored by the superior peroneal retinaculum. Peroneal instability is usually classified using the Eckert and Davies classification, which was modified by Oden into a four-point grading system. The mechanism of injury is typically sudden forced dorsiflexion, resulting in aggressive tautness of the peroneal tendons, combined with a forced eversion of the hindfoot. Plain X-ray, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are useful for imaging of the injury and in planning for surgery. Operative management has high success rates and there are multiple surgical techniques available, including superior peroneal retinaculum repair, tenoplasty, bone block procedures, groove deepening and endoscopic approaches, with little variation in outcome found between the approaches.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Joint Dislocations , Tendon Injuries , Humans , Tendon Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Ankle , Ankle Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Injuries/surgery , Tendons/diagnostic imaging , Tendons/surgery , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/surgery
3.
Bone Joint J ; 105-B(6): 696-701, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37257857

ABSTRACT

Aims: Intra-articular (IA) tumours around the knee are treated with extra-articular (EA) resection, which is associated with poor functional outcomes. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in predicting IA involvement around the knee. Methods: We identified 63 cases of high-grade sarcomas in or around the distal femur that underwent an EA resection from a prospectively maintained database (January 1996 to April 2020). Suspicion of IA disease was noted in 52 cases, six had IA pathological fracture, two had an effusion, two had prior surgical intervention (curettage/IA intervention), and one had an osseous metastasis in the proximal tibia. To ascertain validity, two musculoskeletal radiologists (R1, R2) reviewed the preoperative imaging (MRI) of 63 consecutive cases on two occasions six weeks apart. The radiological criteria for IA disease comprised evidence of tumour extension within the suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, extension along medial/lateral retinaculum, and presence of IA fracture. The radiological predictions were then confirmed with the final histopathology of the resected specimens. Results: The resection histology revealed 23 cases (36.5%) showing IA disease involvement compared with 40 cases without (62%). The intraobserver variability of R1 was 0.85 (p < 0.001) compared to R2 with κ = 0.21 (p = 0.007). The interobserver variability was κ = 0.264 (p = 0.003). Knee effusion was found to be the most sensitive indicator of IA involvement, with a sensitivity of 91.3% but specificity of only 35%. However, when combined with a pathological fracture, this rose to 97.5% and 100% when disease was visible in Hoffa's fat pad. Conclusion: MRI imaging can sometimes overestimate IA joint involvement and needs to be correlated with clinical signs. In the light of our findings, we would recommend EA resections when imaging shows effusion combined with either disease in Hoffa's fat pad or retinaculum, or pathological fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Spontaneous , Joint Diseases , Sarcoma , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Sarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Sarcoma/surgery
4.
J Spine Surg ; 8(3): 353-361, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36285091

ABSTRACT

Background: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to estimate the blood loss during TES procedures performed in the last ten years at our tertiary referral centre and compare EBL with actual blood loss (ABL). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all cases managed surgically with TES referred to our centre between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the oncological characteristics of each tumour and surgical management in terms of resection margins, operative duration and instrumentation. Data relating to peri-operative blood loss was also recorded including an estimation of total blood loss, the use of cell salvage where applicable and transfusion rates. Results: A total of 21 patients were found to meet our inclusion criteria. There were 11 men and 10 women, with a median age of 40 years. The mean total ABL was 3,310 mL. Total operation time ranged from 6.53 to 19.7 h. Compared to ABL, in 59% of cases EBL had been underestimated by an average of 78% by volume. The EBL of the remaining 41% cases had been overestimated by 43%. This was not statistically significant (P=0.373). Cell salvage was used in 62% patients with a mean blood loss of 2,845 mL (884-4,939 mL) and transfusion of 3.8 units (0-12 units) versus 4,069 mL (297-8,335 mL) and 9.3 units (0-18 units) in those not managed with cell salvage. There was no significant difference in ABL between the cell salvage and non-cell salvage groups. Conclusions: We report one of the largest case series in TES for primary bone tumours. EBL is not a reliable predictor for ABL. A large blood loss should be anticipated and use of cell salvage is recommended.

5.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 60(3): 466-470, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509722

ABSTRACT

High energy open midfoot injuries are uncommon but devastating injuries. A combination of complex fracture dislocations and soft tissue injury patterns render reconstruction challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical and patient reported outcomes following orthoplastic management of open midfoot injuries in a Major Trauma Center. A retrospective review of all open midfoot fractures admitted to our unit between January 2015 and December 2016 was undertaken. Demographics, operative details, complications, additional surgeries, and patient reported outcomes in the form of EQ-5D and Enneking scores were collected. Fifteen patients were identified (13 male, mean age 39.2 years). One patient underwent amputation at initial debridement and 8 required additional debridement. Of these 8 patients, 3 had an amputation during their index admission. In the limb salvage group (11 patients), definitive soft tissue cover involved free flaps in 6 patients, split skin graft in 3 patients, and delayed primary closure in 2 patients. Definitive orthopedic treatment was internal fixation in 8 and external fixation in 3 patients. Two patients required a Masquelet procedure for bone loss. One patient had a toe amputation and 1 had a below knee amputation for deep infection. The median EQ-5D score was 66 (interquartile range 43), and the median Enneking score was 20.5 (interquartile range 9). Limb salvage following open midfoot fractures is technically possible in most cases, however this often involves multiple procedures and the outcomes are variable and difficult to predict. Patients should be carefully counseled, and amputation considered in all such cases.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Open , Soft Tissue Injuries , Tibial Fractures , Adult , Fractures, Open/surgery , Humans , Limb Salvage , Male , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
6.
Bone Joint J ; 102-B(8): 1048-1055, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32731828

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The Fassier Duval (FD) rod is a third-generation telescopic implant for children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Threaded fixation enables proximal insertion without opening the knee or ankle joint. We have reviewed our combined two-centre experience with this implant. METHODS: In total, 34 children with a mean age of five years (1 to 14) with severe OI have undergone rodding of 72 lower limb long bones (27 tibial, 45 femoral) for recurrent fractures with progressive deformity despite optimized bone health and bisphosphonate therapy. Data were collected prospectively, with 1.5 to 11 years follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (33%) required exchange of implants (14 femora and ten tibiae) including 11 rods bending with refracture. Four (5%) required reoperation with implant retention. Loss of proximal fixation in the femur and distal fixation in the tibia were common. Four patients developed coxa vara requiring surgical correction. In total, 13 patients experienced further fractures without rod bending; eight required implant revision. There was one deep infection. The five-year survival rate, with rod revision as the endpoint, was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 77%) for femoral rods, with a mean age at implantation of 4.8 years (1.3 to 14.8), and 64% (95% CI 36% to 82%) for tibial rods, with a mean age at implantation of 5.2 years (2.0 to 13.8). CONCLUSION: FD rods are easier to implant but do not improve on the revision rates reported for second generation T-piece rods. Proximal femoral fixation is problematic in younger children with a partially ossified greater trochanter. Distal tibial fixation typically fails after two years. Future generation implants should address proximal femoral and distal tibial fixation to avoid the majority of complications in this series. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1048-1055.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Fracture Healing/physiology , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/surgery , Reoperation/methods , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Humans , Internal Fixators , Male , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/complications , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/etiology , Time Factors
7.
Injury ; 51(7): 1448-1456, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32430194

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tibial plafond fractures (TPF) are complex injuries often resulting in poor outcomes. Combination of articular impaction, metaphysealcomminution and soft-tissue injury results in a significant treatment challenge. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare post-operative complications and functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus circular external fixation (CEF) for treatment of TPF. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane library was undertaken. All studies published in English language comparing ORIF with CEF for treatment of TPF were included. RESULTS: 5 comparative studies with 239 fractures met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in rates of non-union, malunion, superficial infection, deep infection, and secondary arthrodesis between the two treatment groups. Significantly higher rate of unplanned metalwork removal (RR 5.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 28.55, p = 0.04) and lower rate of post-traumatic arthritis (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.78, p = 0.003) were found in patients that underwent ORIF. 1 study showed significantly lower functional outcomes scores with CEF (p< 0.05), whereas 3 studies found comparable functional outcomes between the two treatment groups. Overall, there was a preference in treating more severe injuries with CEF. CONCLUSION: CEF and ORIF are both acceptable treatment options for surgical management of TPF, with comparable post-operative complication rates and functional outcomes. This study highlights paucity of high-quality evidence regarding the optimal fixation method for TPF.


Subject(s)
External Fixators , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Open Fracture Reduction , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Fracture Healing , Humans , Intra-Articular Fractures/surgery , Physical Functional Performance , Postoperative Complications
8.
Eur Spine J ; 29(5): 977-985, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31902000

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The cement augmentation of a conventional anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid process fractures for elderly patients significantly increased stiffness and load to failure under anterior-posterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. The amount and quality of bone cement are usually taken ad hoc in clinical practise. In this study, we wanted to clarify the role of bone cement amount and its quality to the stiffness of odontoid and vertebrae body junction. METHODS: Finite-element method was used to achieve different scenarios of cement augmentation. For all models, an initial stiffness was calculated. Model (1) the intact vertebrae were virtually potted into a polymethylmethacrylate base via the posterior vertebral arches. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anterior-posterior direction. (2) The odontoid fracture type IIa (Anderson-D'Alonzo classification) was achieved by virtual transverse osteotomy. Anterior screw fixation was virtually performed by putting self-drilling titanium alloy 3.5 mm diameter anterior cannulated lag screw with a 12 mm thread into the inspected vertebrae. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anterior-posterior direction. The vertebrae body was assumed to be non-cemented and cemented with different volume. RESULTS: The mean cement volume was lowest for body base filling with 0.47 ± 0.03 ml. The standard body filling corresponds to 0.95 ± 0.15 ml. The largest volume corresponds to 1.62 ± 0.12 ml in the presence of cement leakage. The initial stiffness of the intact C2 vertebrae was taken as the reference value. The mean initial stiffness for non-porous cement (E = 3000 MPa) increased linearly (R2 = 0.98). The lowest stiffness (123.3 ± 5.8 N/mm) was measured in the intact C2 vertebrae. However, the highest stiffness (165.2 ± 5.2 N/mm) was measured when cement leakage out of the odontoid peg occurred. The mean initial stiffness of the base-only cemented group was 147.2 ± 8.4 N/mm compared with 157.9 ± 6.6 N/mm for the base and body cemented group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0061). The mean initial stiffness for porous cement (E = 500 MPa) remains constant. Therefore, there is no difference between cemented and non-cemented junction. This difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.18). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the low porous cement was able to significantly influence the stiffness of the augmented odontoid screw fixation in vitro, although further in vivo clinical studies should be undertaken. Our results suggest that only a small amount of non-porous cement is needed to restore stiffness at least to its pre-fracture level and this can be achieved with the injection of 0.7-1.2 ml of cement. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Subject(s)
Odontoid Process , Spinal Fractures , Aged , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Odontoid Process/diagnostic imaging , Odontoid Process/injuries , Odontoid Process/surgery , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/surgery
9.
Injury ; 47 Suppl 6: S33-S39, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28040085

ABSTRACT

The management of upper limb non-unions can be challenging and often with unpredictable outcomes. In this study we present our experience with the use of BMP-7 in the treatment of upper limb non-unions. Between 2004 and 2011 all consecutive patients who were treated with BMP-7 were followed up prospectively until fracture union. Fracture union was assessed with regular radiological and clinical assessment. At the final follow up clinical assessment included the short Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. The minimum follow up was 12 months (12-36). In total 42 patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 47 years. Anatomical distribution of the nonunion sites included 19 cases of mid/proximal forearm, 14 humeri, 6 distal radius and 3 clavicle. 35 patients had atrophic non-union, 11 had previous open fractures, and 10 had bone loss (range 1-3 cm). The mean number of operations performed and the mean time from injury to BMP-7 application was 1.5 and 26 months, respectively. 40 fractures had both clinical and radiological union whereas 2 patients had partial radiological union but a pain free range of motion. BMP-7 was applied in isolation in 1 case and in 41 cases the application was combined with autologous bone grafting. DASH scores were available at final follow up in 23 (55%) patients with a mean of 33 score (range 2-86.4). This study supports the view that the combination of ABG and BMP-7 can be considered as a successful treatment modality for the treatment of recalcitrant upper limb non-unions. Further studies preferably randomised controlled trials are desirable to throw more light into the role of BMP-7 in the treatment of upper limb nonunions.


Subject(s)
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7/therapeutic use , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Bone/drug therapy , Fractures, Ununited , Upper Extremity/pathology , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7/pharmacology , Bone Transplantation , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Healing/drug effects , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/pathology , Fractures, Ununited/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Ununited/drug therapy , Fractures, Ununited/pathology , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular , Treatment Outcome
10.
Int Orthop ; 37(7): 1335-9, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23420325

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Major pelvic injuries resulting from high-energy trauma require emergency hospital treatment, and part of the initial management includes mechanical stabilisation of the pelvis. Controversies include binder position, use in lateral compression injuries and application during radiological assessment. We present the results of a survey of both emergency department and orthopaedic specialties. METHODS: A telephone survey of all 144 trauma units in the UK accepting adult pelvic trauma patients was carried out in July 2012. The duty registrar for the emergency and orthopaedic departments was contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: A response rate of 100% was achieved. Pelvic binders were available for use in approximately three quarters of the trauma units surveyed. Eight-five emergency department (59%) and 79 orthopaedic (54.9%) registrars had been given training on pelvic binder application. Fifty-six emergency department (38.9%) and 114 orthopaedic (79.1%) registrars identified the level of the greater trochanters as the most suitable position for the binder. Forty-five emergency department (31.3%) and 58 orthopaedic (40.3%) registrars used pelvic binders in suspected lateral compression injuries. One hundred and twenty-six emergency department (87.5%) and 113 orthopaedic (78.5%) registrars would not release the binder during radiological assessment of the pelvis in a haemodynamically stable patient. CONCLUSION: There is great variability in practice amongst trauma units in the UK. Training must be formalised and provided as a mandatory part of departmental induction. The use of standardised treatment algorithms in trauma units and the Advanced Trauma and Life Support (ATLS) framework may help decision making and improve patient survival rates.


Subject(s)
Data Collection , Orthopedic Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Professional Competence , Radiography , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...