ABSTRACT
Tofts models have failed to produce reliable quantitative markers for prostate cancer. We examined the differences between prostate zones and lesion PI-RADS categories and grade group (GG) using regions of interest drawn in tumor and normal-appearing tissue for a two-compartment uptake (2CU) model (including plasma volume (vp), plasma flow (Fp), permeability surface area product (PS), plasma mean transit time (MTTp), capillary transit time (Tc), extraction fraction (E), and transfer constant (Ktrans)) and exponential (amplitude (A), arrival time (t0), and enhancement rate (α)), sigmoidal (amplitude (A0), center time relative to arrival time (A1 - T0), and slope (A2)), and empirical mathematical models, and time to peak (TTP) parameters fitted to high temporal resolution (1.695 s) DCE-MRI data. In 25 patients with 35 PI-RADS category 3 or higher tumors, we found Fp and α differed between peripheral and transition zones. Parameters Fp, MTTp, Tc, E, α, A1 - T0, and A2 and TTP all showed associations with PI-RADS categories and with GG in the PZ when normal-appearing regions were included in the non-cancer GG. PS and Ktrans were not associated with any PI-RADS category or GG. This pilot study suggests early enhancement parameters derived from ultrafast DCE-MRI may become markers of prostate cancer.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-dose 6MV radiotherapy may cause cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) to malfunction. To assess CIED malfunctions resulting from direct exposure up to 10â¯Gy, 100 pacemakers (PMs) and 40 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CIEDs underwent baseline interrogation. In ICDs, antitachycardia therapies were disabled via the programmer while the detection windows were left enabled. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to build the corresponding treatment plan. CIEDs were "blinded" and randomized to receive single doses of either 2, 5, or, 10â¯Gy via a 6-MV linear accelerator (linac) in a water phantom. Twenty-two wireless telemetry-enabled CIEDs underwent a real-time session, and their function was recorded by the video camera in the bunker. The CIEDs were interrogated after exposure and once monthly for 6 months. RESULTS: During exposure, regardless of dose, 90.9% of the CIEDs recorded electromagnetic interference, with 6 ICDs (27.3%) reporting pacing inhibition and inappropriate arrhythmia detections. After exposure, a backup reset was observed in 1 PM (0.7% overall, 1% among PMs), while 7 PMs (5% overall, 7% among PMs) reported battery issues (overall immediate malfunction rate was 5.7%). During follow-up, 4 PMs (2.9% overall; 4% among PMs) and 1 ICD (0.7% overall; 2.5% among ICDs) reported abnormal battery depletion, and 1 PM (0.7% overall; 1% among PMs) reported a backup reset (overall late malfunction rate was 4.3%). CONCLUSION: Apart from transient electromagnetic interference, last-generation CIEDs withstood direct 6MV exposure up to 10â¯Gy. Permanent battery or software errors occurred immediately or later only in less recent CIEDs.
