Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Food Prot ; 87(1): 100199, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38029842

ABSTRACT

This is a review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalls of products that are for dogs and cats which took place from 2003 through 2022. It includes recalls for pet foods (food, treats, and chews), ingredients, supplements (vitamins and minerals), and drugs. There were 3,691 recalls during this period: 51% were Class I, 35% were Class II, and 14% were Class III. Food items and ingredients accounted for the majority or 68%, drugs for 27%, and supplements (vitamins and minerals) accounted for 5% of these recalls. Recalls that could be associated with dogs only accounted for 42%, with cats only 18%, and with multiple species 40%. The primary reasons for the recalls were biological contamination at 35%, chemical contamination at 32%, and cGMP violations at 8%. Almost 25% of the total recalls in the past 20 years were due to a melamine incident in 2007/2008 (73% of those were Class I). Salmonella recalls for the 20 years accounted for 23% of the total recalls (94 % of those were Class I). Although the recalls for vitamins and minerals accounted for only 5.6% percent of the total, 70% of those were Class I and 30% Class II. Pet food is a complex part of the processed food industry, and the processing of pet food is subject to at least 40 different federal regulations. To avoid recalls and be successful, pet food manufacturers need a robust food safety culture to meet all of these requirements to produce a safe product. In contrast, the melamine contamination (an adulteration event) in 2007/2008 which resulted in animal deaths and recalls is a prime example of the need for an effective and robust supplier approval program in order to avoid fraudulent suppliers in the future.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , United States , Cats , Animals , Dogs , Food Contamination/analysis , Cat Diseases/therapy , Dog Diseases/therapy , Vitamins , United States Food and Drug Administration , Minerals , Animal Feed/analysis
2.
J Food Prot ; 85(1): 60-72, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34591090

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This review covers 18 years of voluntary recalls of tuna sold commercially in the United States. Recall information is a valuable indicator of failure to implement procedures for food safety. The voluntary recalls involve tuna that was fresh, frozen, processed, hermetically sealed, retorted in a shelf-stable pack (i.e., canned), and formulated into other tuna products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations address the capture, processing, transportation, and sale of raw and processed seafood. These regulations include current good manufacturing practices, the Food Modernization Act, emergency permit controls, and guidelines for low-acid canned foods, seafood hazard analysis and critical control points, food labeling, and sanitary food transportation. Traceability and the food safety culture are important for successfully preventing or implementing recalls. The recalls themselves were separated into product treatment groups: uncooked products, canned shelf-stable products, and products in which tuna was used as an ingredient. The recalls were further categorized and summarized by reason or cause, such as biological and chemical contamination, undeclared ingredients, underprocessing, and foreign materials. The primary causes of recalls of the reviewed tuna products were (in order) Listeria monocytogenes, undeclared allergens, elevated histamine concentrations, and underprocessing of retorted tuna products. The recalls for elevated histamine concentrations primarily affected uncooked (raw) tuna. Recalls for Listeria contamination and the presence of undeclared allergens were primarily class I recalls, and recalls for elevated histamine concentrations and underprocessing were almost always assigned to the less serious recall class II.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination , Tuna , Allergens/analysis , Animals , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Labeling , Food Safety , Seafood/analysis , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...