Exenatide twice daily: analysis of effectiveness and safety data stratified by age, sex, race, duration of diabetes, and body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is used twice daily (BID) as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exenatide BID in patients stratified by various demographic characteristics. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included data from 16 randomized controlled trials in which patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated with 10-µg exenatide BID. Each patient was classified into subgroups on the basis of his or her baseline values for age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), sex (male or female), race (white, black, Asian, or Hispanic), duration of diabetes (< 10 years or ≥ 10 years), and body mass index (BMI; ≥ 20 to < 25, ≥ 25 to < 30, ≥ 30 to < 35, or ≥ 35 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: A total of 2067 patients were included. All groups experienced significant improvements in glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose levels (other than black patients, who had a relatively low baseline fasting plasma glucose level), and body weight from baseline to endpoint. Most groups had significant improvements in systolic blood pressure. All of the age, sex, and duration of diabetes groups experienced significant improvements in lipid levels (other than high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Whites and Asians generally experienced significant improvements in lipid levels, whereas blacks and Hispanics did not. Significant improvements in lipid levels were generally seen across BMI groups. The most common adverse events overall were nausea (38.6%), hypoglycemia (28.4%), and vomiting (14.0%). Hypoglycemia was more common overall in patients who were taking a concomitant sulfonylurea than it was in patients who were not. CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis, exenatide BID improved glycemic control and body weight, and had generally beneficial effects on blood pressure and lipid levels in patients regardless of baseline age, sex, race, duration of diabetes, or BMI. Gastrointestinal events were the most common adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00039026, NCT00039013, NCT00082381, NCT00035984, NCT00082407, NCT00381342, NCT00360334, NCT00375492, NCT00603239, NCT00765817, NCT00577824, NCT00434954].

Health and economic outcomes for exenatide once weekly, insulin, and pioglitazone therapies in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a simulation analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at risk of long-term vascular complications. In trials, exenatide once weekly (ExQW), a GLP-1R agonist, improved glycemia, weight, blood pressure (BP), and lipids in patients with T2DM. We simulated potential effects of ExQW on vascular complications, survival, and medical costs over 20 years versus standard therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Archimedes model was used to assess outcomes for ~25,000 virtual patients with T2DM (NHANES 1999-2006 [metformin ± sulfonylureas, age 57 years, body mass index 33 kg/m(2), weight 94 kg, duration T2DM 9 years, hemoglobin A1c [A1C] 8.1%]). The effects of three treatment strategies were modeled and compared to moderate-adherence insulin therapy: advancement to high-adherence insulin at A1C ≥ 8% (treat to target A1C < 7%) and addition of pioglitazone (PIO) or ExQW from simulation start. ExQW effects on A1C, weight, BP, and lipids were modeled from clinical trial data. Costs, inflated to represent 2010 $US, were derived from Medicare data, Drugstore.com, and publications. As ExQW was investigational, we omitted ExQW, PIO, and insulin pharmacy costs. RESULTS: By year 1, ExQW treatment decreased A1C (~1.5%), weight (~2 kg), and systolic BP (~5 mmHg). PIO and high-adherence insulin decreased A1C by ~1%, increased weight, and did not affect systolic BP. After 20 years, A1C was ~7% with all strategies. ExQW decreased rates of cardiovascular and microvascular complications more than PIO or high-adherence insulin versus moderate-adherence insulin. Over 20 years, ExQW treatment resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ~0.3 years/person and cost savings of $469/life-year versus moderate adherence insulin. For PIO or high-adherence insulin, QALYs were virtually unchanged, and costs/life-year versus moderate-adherence insulin increased by $69 and $87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term simulation demonstrated that ExQW treatment may decrease rates of cardiovascular and some microvascular complications of T2DM. Increased QALYs, and decreased costs were also projected.

Exenatide BID Observational Study (ExOS): results for primary and secondary endpoints of a prospective research study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID use in patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE: The Exenatide BID Observational Study (ExOS) was designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a real-world clinical practice setting in the United States. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from 74 practice sites from 9/2007 through 1/2009 and followed for 12 months. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieving or maintaining hemoglobin A1C of ≤7.0%, or an absolute drop of 0.5% from baseline. Secondary measures included absolute and percentage change from baseline for a variety of clinical measures (lipid markers, weight, BMI, etc.), and quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Lite. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were included in the primary study population. At baseline, patients (60% female) had mean (SD) age of 55 (11), T2D duration of 9 (8) years, HbA1c of 8.0 (1.7) %, and body mass index (BMI) of 38.2 (7.4) kg/m(2). Family history of T2D was reported in 73.9% of patients. Hypertension was reported in 61.5% of patients, and 47.1% had hyperlipidemia. The HbA1c goal was achieved in 76.3% of the 118 patients with A1C measurements available at 12 months (P < 0.0001). Patients with available clinical measurements achieved significant improvements in HbA1c, weight, BMI, and QOL measurements at 12 months. A mean improvement of 4.56 was seen in the total IWQOL-Lite score at 12 months (P = 0.001). The single-arm design of this study is a limitation; however, the overall objective of the study was to observe patients on exenatide BID therapy over time, comparing their status at endpoint to baseline, rather than to make comparisons among different drug therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The Exenatide BID Observational Study supports the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID observed in previous clinical trials and retrospective database studies.

Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes using concomitant exenatide BID and long-acting insulin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the frequency of hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes who had concomitantly used exenatide BID (exenatide) and long-acting insulin and continued this combination vs those who continued long-acting insulin alone. METHODS: Retrospective analyses, using a large managed care database, were used to estimate the frequency of hypoglycemia (episodes/patient/6 months) for patients who concomitantly used exenatide and long-acting insulin during a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: From among 2082 patients on concomitant exenatide and long-acting insulin, those who continued this combination (n=472) had a lower frequency of hypoglycemia compared to those who remained on long-acting insulin alone (n=312) (0.03 ± 1.9 vs 0.10 ± 1.01 [episodes/patient/6 months]; p<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Only hypoglycemia that required medical intervention (coded for hypoglycemia) was captured. The study could not evaluate any association between insulin dose titration and hypoglycemia or examine other outcomes such as HbA1c, weight, and body mass index, due to lack of data availability. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who concomitantly used exenatide BID and long-acting insulin experienced a lower rate of hypoglycemia.

Exenatide bid observational study (ExOS): baseline population characteristics of a prospective research study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide bid use in patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Exenatide Observational Study (ExOS) and patients initiating exenatide therapy in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS: ExOS is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, observational study to assess the effectiveness of up to 24 months of exenatide therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Patients with T2D ≥18 years of age, who initiated exenatide therapy, were eligible. The primary effectiveness endpoint is achieving or maintaining hemoglobin A1C of ≤7.0%, or an absolute drop of 0.5% from baseline. Secondary objective measures evaluate the absolute and percentage changes from baseline for a variety of clinical measures (lipid markers, weight, BMI, etc.) and quality of life (QOL) is assessed using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Lite. RESULTS: On average, the baseline population (n = 531) was aged 55 years, predominantly female (62%), white (79%), educated, obese (mean BMI 39 kg/m(2)), with mean HbA(1c), blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglyceride values of 8.0%, 129/76 mmHg, 174 mg/dL, and 197 mg/dL, respectively. A total of 28% entered the study with HbA(1c) ≤7.0% and 67% were being treated with oral antihyperglycemic drug(s) (OAD) only [1 (28.4%), 2 (28.4%), >2 (10.2%)], or some form of insulin ±OADs (19%), and ≥50% were on a cholesterol-lowering drug(s) ± antihypertensive medication(s). The single-arm design of this study is a limitation; however, the overall objective of the ongoing study is to observe patients on exenatide therapy over time, comparing their status at endpoint to baseline, rather than to make comparisons among different drug therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with exenatide tended to be obese, middle-aged women on various combinations of OADs and/or insulin who often had hypertension and/or dyslipidemia. Further planned analyses will provide the largest sample of prospective data on outcomes of exenatide therapy for up to 24 months in this usual-care population.

An intervention to improve secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Translating guidelines into clinical practice has proved to be quite difficult, even when the guidelines are well accepted and noncontroversial. Both computerized reminders and academic detailing have been effective in changing physician prescribing behavior. In this study, we sought to use these methods, mediated by clinical pharmacists, to improve adherence to the secondary prevention guidelines in hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS: A randomized, prospective study was performed in which computerized alerts identifying hospitalized patients with elevated troponin I levels were routed to clinical pharmacists. The pharmacists then conducted academic detailing for physicians caring for patients with acute myocardial infarction who were randomized to the intervention group. Patients in the control group received standard care. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients discharged on a regimen of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins. RESULTS: The intervention had a significant impact on the proportion of patients discharged on a regimen of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (328/365 [89.9%] vs 409/488 [83.8%], intervention vs control, respectively, P = .02), and statins (344/365 [94.2%] vs 436/488 [89.3%], P = .02). There was no statistical impact on beta-blocker (350/365 [95.9%] vs 448/488 [91.8%], P = .10) or aspirin use (352/365 [96.4%] vs 471/488 [96.5%], P = .87). When all 4 classes were considered together, 305 (83.6%) of 365 patients vs 343 (70.3%) of 488 patients were discharged on a regimen of all secondary prevention medications to which they did not have a contraindication (P<.001). CONCLUSION: A computerized alert with pharmacist-mediated academic detailing is an effective means to increase adherence to secondary prevention guidelines for coronary heart disease.

Implementation of an automated guideline monitor for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction.

Clinical practice guidelines can be used to help improve health care quality, but they are often not optimally implemented. Practice enabling and reinforcing techniques, such as clinical reminders and academic detailing are effective methods for translating guidelines into practice. Following a study showing that we could improve adherence to secondary prevention guidelines for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using computerized alerts and academic detailing, we implemented an automated monitor to accomplish the same goal in a less labor-intensive manner. This paper describes the implementation of this production application.