Differences in hemispheric asymmetry between dyslexic and normal children on a lateralised lexical decision task.

The present experiment was conducted in order to further investigate the relationship between deficits in left hemisphere processing and phonetic decoding in dyslexic children. We administered a lateralised lexical decision task that manipulated wordness, length, and word regularity of grapheme-phoneme conversion. Right-handed male dyslexic children and normal control children were presented with words and pronounceable nonwords. Although there were no overall differences in hemispheric asymmetry between the groups, they did differ in laterality effects in accuracy when responding to nonwords and to phonetically regular words, with the normal children showing the right visual field advantage/ sensitivity (left hemisphere dominance/sensitivity), while the dyslexics failed to show any visual field advantage or sensitivity for these stimuli. Further, group differences were observed in left but not right hemisphere functioning. The results suggest that deficits in left hemisphere processing are apparent only when the dyslexics are attempting to utilise the rules of phonics. Support for the use of this paradigm for use with dyslexic children is also discussed.

Individual variation in hemispheric asymmetry: multitask study of effects related to handedness and sex.

Functional hemispheric asymmetries were examined for right- or left-handed men and women. Tasks involved (a) auditory processing of verbal material, (b) processing of emotions shown on faces, (c) processing of visual categorical and coordinate spatial relations, and (d) visual processing of verbal material. Similar performance asymmetries were found for the right-handed and left-handed groups, but the average asymmetries tended to be smaller for the left-handed group. For the most part, measures of performance asymmetry obtained from the different tasks did not correlate with each other, suggesting that individual subjects cannot be simply characterized as strongly or weakly lateralized. However, ear differences obtained in Task 1 did correlate significantly with certain visual field differences obtained in Task 4, suggesting that both tasks are sensitive to hemispheric asymmetry in similar phonetic or language-related processes.

Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening.

The present experiment was designed to investigate the effects of the following two variables on the identification of dichotically presented CV syllables: (1) the relative difference in intensity levels of the stimuli presented to the two ears and (2) the instructions to attend to both ears or to focus attention on one ear. As expected for a verbal task, more CV's were identified from the right ear than from the left ear. Furthermore, identification of stimuli presented to one ear improved when (1) those stimuli were relatively higher in volume than the stimuli presented to the other ear and (2) when subjects were instructed to focus attention on only that ear rather than distribute attention across both ears. Of particular importance is the finding that the effects of relative stimulus intensity are the same under conditions of focused attention as under conditions of divided attention. This finding is inconsistent with an attention explantation of the relative intensity effects. Instead, the results are consistent with a model of dichotic listening in which ear of stimulus presentation and relative stimulus intensity influence a perceptual stage of information processing and attentional instructions influence a subsequent response selection stage.

Multitask investigation of individual differences in hemispheric asymmetry.

Right-handed subjects (N = 120) participated in four different laterality tasks designed to measure aspects of cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: identification of dichotically presented consonant-vowel syllables (CVs), examination of the effects of concurrent repetition of CVs and concurrent anagram solution on finger-tapping by the right and left hands, lateralized identification of CVs presented tachistoscopically to the left and right visual fields, and left/right biases on a free-vision face task involving judgments of emotion. Ear differences in the dichotic listening task were related to the pattern of lateralized interference in the dual-task finger-tapping paradigm. There were no other significant relations between pairs of tasks, but when the present results are considered in the light of other recent experiments, there appears to be a relation between lateral bias on the free-vision face task and visual field differences in tachistoscopic identification. The pattern of results has implications for hypothesized individual differences among right-handers in cerebral dominance for verbal processes, input pathway dominance, and asymmetric arousal of the two cerebral hemispheres.