Treatment of Kyphosis Arising Secondary to Laminectomy and Irradiation in the Pediatric Population.

The effects of radiation therapy and laminectomy on the growing spine have been well documented. Due to compromised bone quality after irradiation, spinal fusion has a high failure rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment of post-laminectomy and post-irradiation kyphosis in children using a vascularized rib graft (VRG) to augment anterior spinal fusion and posterior spinal fusion. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records for all patients treated at a single institution for post-laminectomy and post-irradiation kyphosis who underwent VRG to augment spinal fusions done between December 2003 and August 2015. Five patients were included in the analysis. Imaging studies were analyzed by 2 senior pediatric orthopedic surgeons and a pediatric orthopedic surgery fellow. The outcome for all 5 patients who underwent VRG were considered successful at most recent clinical follow-up. Success was defined as the following: complete fusion evident through computed tomography scan, no implant failure, and no kyphosis progression. Follow-up ranged from 21 to 63 months. One patient experienced 2 complications: esophageal tear and deep infection. Spinal fusion with a VRG is a viable treatment option for children who have developed kyphosis following laminectomy and irradiation. On long-term follow-up, there has been no evidence of progression of kyphosis for patients who were treated with VRG in either the primary fusion procedure or in subsequent revision procedures. A VRG provides a non-irradiated, vascularized bone graft to bridge the irradiated segments, increasing the stability of the spine. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e563-e569.].

Topical Vancomycin in Pediatric Spine Surgery Does Not Reduce Surgical Site Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) in pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been increased interest in use of topical vancomycin to reduce SSI in spine surgery with mixed results reported in the literature. In Summer 2012, our institution implemented the use of topical vancomycin in definitive primary and revision PSF as part of our infection control protocol. METHODS: After IRB approval, a consecutive series of 527 patients (538 procedures) undergoing PSF January 2010-December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to identify the occurrence of SSI. Based on published results from a similar study, an a priori power analysis determined 190 patients were needed per group to achieve 0.90 power. In 228 procedures, topical vancomycin was used (Vanco) and in 310 procedures it was not (No Vanco). Exclusion criteria were <90 days follow-up, >18 years at time of surgery, and combined anterior and posterior fusion. Two-sample t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the cohorts. RESULTS: Groups were similar in age, sex, implant density, fusion length, risk categorization, and surgical time (p > .05). No Vanco had significantly higher blood loss and incidence and amount of intraoperative allogenic transfusion (p < .001). Incidence of SSI was 3% (7/228) in Vanco and 2% (6/310) in No Vanco (p = .4099). Six of the 7 SSIs occurred in high-risk patients in Vanco and 5 of 6 occurred in high-risk patients in No Vanco (p = 1). Reoperation within 90 days was 6% (13/228) in Vanco and 4% (11/310) in No Vanco (p = .2912). Occurrence of other complications was similar between Vanco, 3% (7/228), and No Vanco, 2% (5/310). CONCLUSION: Use of topical vancomycin did not reduce incidence of SSI for pediatric patients undergoing PSF at our institution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Compliance With a Comprehensive Antibiotic Protocol Improves Infection Incidence in Pediatric Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary task force, designated Target Zero, has developed protocols for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) for spine surgery at our institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how compliance with an antibiotic bundle impacts infection incidences in pediatric spine surgery. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a consecutive series of 511 patients (517 procedures) who underwent primary spine procedures from 2008 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who developed SSI. Patients were followed for a minimum of 90 days postoperatively. Compliance data were collected prospectively in 511 consecutive patients and a total of 517 procedures. Three criteria were required for antibiotic bundle compliance: appropriate antibiotics completely administered within 1 hour before incision, antibiotics appropriately redosed intraoperatively for blood loss and time, and antibiotics discontinued within 24 hours postoperatively. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between compliance and the development of an infection. RESULTS: Overall antibiotic bundle compliance rate was 85%. After adjusting for risk category, estimated blood loss, and study year, the likelihood of an infection was increased in the noncompliant group compared with the compliant group (adjusted odds ratio: 3.0, 95% CI, 0.96-9.47, P=0.0587). When expressed as the number needed to treat, strict adherence to antibiotic bundle compliance prevented 1 SSI within 90 days of surgery for every 26 patients treated with the antibiotic bundle. Reasons for noncompliance included failure to infuse preoperative antibiotics 1 hour before incision (10.3%), failure to redose antibiotics intraoperatively based on time or blood loss (5.5%), and failure to discontinue antibiotics within 24 hours postoperatively (1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with a comprehensive antibiotic protocol can lead to meaningful reductions in SSI incidences in pediatric spine surgery. Institutions should focus on improving compliance with prophylactic antibiotic protocols to decrease SSI in pediatric spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Spine and Thoracic Height Measurements Have Excellent Interrater and Intrarater Reliability in Patients With Early Onset Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Reproducibility of measurements. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the reliability and standard error of measurement of spine and thoracic height radiographic measurements in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine and thoracic height radiographic measurements are often used as a surrogate for pulmonary development in patients with EOS. There is limited literature validating the reliability of spine and thoracic height measurements in the EOS population. METHODS: Using pilot data, we determined measuring 49 unique radiographs would provide 80% power to obtain a 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.05 for the interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A random sampling strategy, stratified by underlying diagnosis from the Classification of Early Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS), was used to distribute the diagnoses in the study sample. Two attending pediatric spine surgeons, two pediatric orthopedic fellows, and two research assistants measured coronal spine (T1-S1) and thoracic (T1-T12) height on digital radiographs using imaging software (Surgimap; Nemaris, Inc, New York) on two separate occasions at least 3 weeks apart. Order of images was randomized for the second iteration. Linear mixed model regression analyses were used to estimate interrater and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: The study sample included subjects (N = 48) with idiopathic (N = 17, 35%), congenital (N = 16, 33%, 1 patient excluded), neuromuscular (N = 11, 23%), and syndromic (N = 4, 8%) scoliosis. Overall interrater reliability estimates for spine height (ICC: 0.894, 95% CI: 0.847-0.932) and thoracic height (ICC: 0.890, 95% CI: 0.844-0.929) were excellent. Intrarater reliability estimates for spine height (ICC: 0.906, 95% CI: 0.830-0.943) and thoracic height (ICC: 0.898, 95% CI: 0.817-0.938) were also excellent. CONCLUSION: There is excellent interrater and intrarater reliability for radiographic measurements of spine and thoracic height in the EOS population at our institution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Radiographs are usually taken on day of pin removal for children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiographs taken at time of pin removal for patients recovering uneventfully alter management. METHODS: After IRB approval, billing records identified 1213 patients aged 1-10 years who underwent elbow surgery between 2007 and 2013 at our institution for a supracondylar humerus fracture. Of these patients, 389 met inclusion criteria. Clinical charts were reviewed for demographics, operative details, and clinical follow-up, focusing on clinical symptoms present at pin removal. Radiographs taken at time of pin removal and subsequent visits were assessed for healing and fracture alignment. RESULTS: In no case was pin removal delayed based on radiographs. One hundred and nineteen (31 %) patients had radiographs taken following pin removal; in no case was loss of reduction found among these patients. No cases of neurologic or vascular injury, re-fracture, or loss of reduction occurred. Infection occurred in 12 patients (3 %). Pins were kept in place for 23.8 ± 4.4 days. Eighty-six patients (22 %) had additional intervention after pin removal (cast application in all cases). Of 389 patients, 75 (19 %) had no documented reason for extended casting, four (1 %) were extended based on physician evaluation of radiographs, and seven (2 %) were extended for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of radiographs at time of pin removal should be considered. If continuing to obtain radiographs at pin removal, we recommend removing pins before taking radiographs to reduce patient fear and anxiety from visualizing percutaneous pins.