Percutaneous arterial closure devices.

Advances in interventional angiography such as covered stent technology and adjunctive anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for arterial recanalization have reached the margins of percutaneous application. In these circumstances, compression methods of arterial closure require prolonged compression or long arterial sheath dwell times that increase procedural time, complication rates, and patient discomfort. Percutaneous arterial closure devices offer the potential of rapid hemostasis and shorter times to ambulation and discharge. These benefits have costs, in terms of the price of the devices and complications of their use. A Web search identified approved and pending devices. A Medline search identified device studies that were reviewed to assess the efficacy and complication rates of device-mediated closure versus the gold standard of manual compression. Studies that compared devices were evaluated to determine if any particular device was superior. The arterial closure devices were equivalent to manual compression in the establishment of hemostasis in the diagnostic population. However, complication rates were higher. In the therapeutic populations, the devices were as efficacious as manual compression, without correction of anticoagulation, and the complication rates were similar. No individual device was clearly superior.

An evaluation of commonly employed central venous catheter kits and their potential risk for complications of excess guidewire introduction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the components of commonly used central venous catheter kits with respect to the potential for guidewire-mediated complications during catheter placement.Prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. SETTING: Six academic hospitals across the United States. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 30 commercially manufactured catheter kits (15 tunneled, 15 nontunneled) were opened and evaluated. The catheter or sheath to be introduced was measured and a corresponding ideal guidewire length was calculated. The ideal length was then compared to the actual length, and differences were tabulated. Wire tip configuration and the presence and pattern of distance markings were recorded and, in conjunction with the catheter and wire length discrepancies, were used to grade the relative risk of introducing excess guidewire during catheter placement. Of 30 kits evaluated, 14 (46.7%) had guidewires more than 20 cm longer than necessary. The mean excess wire length was 15 cm (range: 8 to 55 cm) and did not differ significantly between tunneled and nontunneled catheter kits. Only 10 kits (33.3%) had distance markings of any type, and there was no standardization among them; none corresponded to previously published recommendations. There was potential risk of excess wire introduction in 18 catheter kits, of which seven were nontunneled devices designed for bedside placement. CONCLUSIONS: The design of commonly employed central venous access catheter kits is such that there is a mismatch between guidewire and catheter length and a general lack of guidewire markings. We believe that these designs may predispose to the introduction of excess guidewire and result in guidewire-mediated complications during catheter placement. This risk can likely be reduced by matching the guidewires to the devices placed over them and by standardizing guidewire distance markings.

Management of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) in the pediatric population is uncommon. Management of TRA in general has evolved to include selective nonoperative and endovascular stent graft approaches, although operative repair remains the standard. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients younger than 16 years of age admitted to a single institution between March 1985 and February 2002. RESULTS: Of 160 patients admitted with TRA, 11 were younger than 16 (11.9 +/- 3.5) years of age. Concomitant injuries included closed head injury (5 patients) and acute lung injury (6 patients). All were started on beta-blockers when the diagnosis was suspected. Laparotomy was required in 3 patients and orthopedic procedures in 5 patients. Six underwent operative repair (two primary repairs), with no mortality. Cross-clamp time was 30.4 +/- 2.6 minutes. One patient (operated on without bypass) was partially paralyzed. Two patients were managed nonoperatively, 1 with an intimal arch injury, who on subsequent follow-up has demonstrated healing, and 1 who died of head injury. Three patients were managed by endovascular stent grafts, 2 who died of closed head injury and 1 who at 1-year follow-up has fully recovered. The endovascular stent grafts were placed through the femoral artery in 2 patients and through an iliac conduit in 1 patient. No patient died of rupture. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to pediatric TRA should be identical to the adult, with early institution of beta-blockers. Depending on the clinical setting, a spectrum of options should be considered, including operation, non-operation, and endovascular stent graft, although the choice of the latter must be tempered by the lack of long-term follow-up data.

Treatment of acute thoracic aortic injury with commercially available abdominal aortic stent-grafts.

Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a common cause of death after vehicle collisions. Associated injuries are common, and patients with lung injury, cardiac contusion, abdominal bleeding, and head injury comprise a group at high risk for conventional surgical or medical therapy. In this particular population, existing commercially available stent-grafts may provide a life-saving repair option. The Ancure and AneuRx stent-grafts, designed for abdominal aortic aneurysm application, were successfully placed in three patients. Accommodation for the short length of the delivery device was achieved by retroperitoneal iliac artery access. All patients had follow-up computed tomography (CT) without evidence of endoleak and were doing well with respect to their chest trauma after 5-9 months of follow-up.

Angiographic description of blunt traumatic injuries to the thoracic aorta with specific relevance to endograft repair.

PURPOSE: To describe the precise anatomical location and extent of injury (based on angiography) in a series of patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and evaluate the findings relative to the potential for endograft repair. METHODS: Thoracic aortograms from 50 trauma patients (37 men; mean age 37 years, range 13-87) with BTAI were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters important for endograft repair were recorded, including the length of the pseudoaneurysm, the distance between the origin of the most distal arch vessel and the pseudoaneurysm, the diameter of the aorta both above and below the pseudoaneurysm, and finally, the curvature of the aorta in the vicinity of the pseudoaneurysm. RESULTS: The mean distance from the left subclavian artery to the superior aspect of the injury measured 5.8 mm along the lesser curve and 14.9 mm along the greater curve. The mean length of the injury was 17.0 mm and 26.0 mm along the lesser and greater curves, respectively. The mean aortic diameter adjacent to the injury measured 19.3 mm. The mean degree of curvature of the aorta over the length of the injury was 27.2 degrees, with a mean radius of curvature of 32.6 mm at the superior aspect of the injury and 39.3 mm inferiorly. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases of BTAI, the location of the injury will necessitate covering the origin of the left subclavian artery if endovascular repair is to be performed. The curvature of the aorta in the region predisposed to these injuries requires that the endograft be very flexible and/or precurved.

Natural history of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta managed nonoperatively: a longitudinal analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta (TRA) has traditionally been considered a surgical emergency, there exists a small patient population for whom nonoperative management may be appropriate. The short- and long-term consequences of patients managed in a nonoperative fashion remain unclear. METHODS: A review of patients admitted with TRA over a period of 16 years was performed. Patients who did not undergo operative repair within 24 hours of injury and diagnosis comprised the study group. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were admitted with TRA. Of these, 30 underwent a period of nonoperative management. The mean age of the study patients was 44 +/- 21 years, 80% were male, and the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 34 +/- 9. Fifteen patients underwent delayed operation (DELAY group) at more than 24 hours after injury and diagnosis and 15 patients never underwent repair (NON-OP group). The median time to operation in the DELAY group was 3 days (range 2 to 90). Three patients exhibited progression of TRA within 5 days of injury and of these, 2 died. A total of 3 deaths occurred in the DELAY group (1 rupture and 2 intraoperative arrests). The fifteen NON-OP patients were significantly older (mean age 52 +/- 22 versus 36 +/- 18 years; p = 0.03), tended to be more severely injured (mean ISS 36 +/- 9 versus 32 +/- 8; p = 0.2), and had more premorbid risk factors than the DELAY patients. Five NON-OP patients died, all because of severe head injuries. On long-term follow-up of NON-OP patients, all 10 survivors are alive at a median of 2.5 years (range 6 months to 5 years) without progression of injury or the need for operation. Five of the 10 had complete radiographic resolution of their injuries and 5 have asymptomatic and radiographically stable pseudoaneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with multiple severe associated injuries or high-risk premorbid conditions may have their operations for TRA delayed temporarily or even indefinitely with acceptable survival rates. The potential for rapid progression of TRA in the same patients, however, mandates serial radiographic examinations during the first week of hospitalization after injury and diagnosis.

Intermittent opacification of an injured artery: a potential aid to superselective transcatheter embolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of intermittent opacification, a finding previously described as diagnostic of active bleeding that allows identification of an injured vessel at initial aortography or first-order selective angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 35 consecutive cases that were positive for true or false aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula or malformation, or hemorrhage when a lesion was located beyond a first-order branch of the aorta. An artery that potentially supplied the lesion was considered positive if it filled with contrast material, emptied, and filled again while adjacent vessels demonstrated progressive opacification. RESULTS: Nine (26%) of the 35 cases demonstrated intermittent opacification of an injured artery. All were confirmed as true-positive with superselective catheterization or additional projections, and seven were successfully treated with transcatheter embolization. Intermittent opacification was associated only with false aneurysm and hemorrhage. No congenital arteriovenous malformations or congenital aneurysms demonstrated intermittent opacification. CONCLUSION: If present, the intermittent opacification of an artery is a valuable finding that assists in superselective transcatheter embolization of the arterial branch that supplies a false aneurysm or hemorrhage.

Can we rely on mediastinal widening on chest radiography to identify subjects with aortic injury?

Widening of the mediastinum on chest radiography is widely promoted as a useful criterion for detecting aortic injury. We sought to determine the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of this sign. The initial chest radiographs from 30 subjects with aortic injury and 47 controls were independently reviewed by six radiologists, who were blinded to diagnosis. The radiologists were asked to decide whether the mediastinum was normal or not normal, as well as whether the mediastinum was widened. Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed. Agreement for overall assessment of the mediastinum was substantial (kappa = 0.64). Individual radiologists had sensitivity varying from 0.77 to 0.97 and specificity varying from 0.62 to 0.89. For "widening" of the mediastinum, agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.49). "Widening" was less sensitive than the radiologists' overall impression (P = 0.01), varying from 0.50 to 0.83, but no difference was detected in specificity (P = 0.36), varying from 0.81 to 0.94. Mediastinal width has unacceptable sensitivity for predicting aortic injury, with substantial inter-reader variability. Medical education has ingrained the widely promoted concept of mediastinum widening, which may be misleading.