Subject(s)
Barium Sulfate , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Drug Evaluation , Humans , RadiographySubject(s)
Cholangiography , Cholecystography , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Urography , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Enema , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Germany, East , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Urography/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Colon/diagnostic imaging , Radiography/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Germany, East , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The value of screening procedures (with image intensifiers and television monitor) was compared with films during the radiological examination of the stomach, using a double contrast method. In one experiment, the diagnostic accuracy of experienced radiologists using screening only was compared with standardised films. There was a definite improvement using films. The reason for this was not the difference in the technical excellence of the images, but depended on the cognitive processes which lead the doctor to a diagnosis. For this purpose, static pictures provide a better basis than dynamic, rapidly changing and brief views seen during screening. The results lead to certain considerations concerning the methods for the radiological examination of the stomach.