ABSTRACT
HINTERGRUND: Die Synkanzerogenese am Hautorgan, wissenschaftlich unstrittig, spiegelt sich im monokausal geleiteten Berufskrankheiten (BK)-Recht nicht wider. Nichtmelanozytäre Hauttumoren und deren Vorläuferläsionen können nur nach Einzelprüfung der BK-Nrn. 5103 und 5102 anerkannt werden. METHODIK: Retrospektive Auswertung von 28 zwischen September 2012 und September 2015 begutachteten Fällen (Altersmedian 72,5 J.) mit nichtmelanozytären Hauttumoren und deren Vorläuferläsionen und arbeitsbedingter Exposition gegenüber natürlicher UV-Strahlung und polyzyklischen aromatischen Kohlenwasserstoffen. ERGEBNISSE: In allen 28 Fällen sahen wir die arbeitstechnischen Voraussetzungen nach den BK-Nrn. 5103 und 5102 als erfüllt an. In 26 Fällen (93 %) empfahlen wir die Hautkrebserkrankung als BK-Tatbestand nach den Nrn. 5103 und 5102 anzuerkennen. Dem folgte der Unfallversicherungsträger in vier Fällen. Achtmal wurde die Anerkennung nur nach BK-Nr. 5103, zehnmal nur nach BK-Nr. 5102 und viermal gar nicht ausgesprochen. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Bei nichtmelanozytären Hauttumoren oder deren Vorläuferläsionen an UV-exponierten Hautarealen mit ausreichend kumulativer arbeitsbedingter natürlicher UV-Strahlenexposition und bei arbeitsbedingter Exposition gegenüber polyzyklischen aromatischen Kohlenwasserstoffen sollten mittels BK-Anzeige die "BK-Nrn. 5103 und 5102 im Sinne der Synkanzerogenese" gemeldet werden. Neben der gerechteren Wiedergabe der Arbeitsplatzrealitäten in einem solchen Feststellungsverfahren kann es dann im Konkreten auch zur Anerkennung von Basalzellkarzinomen kommen, die ansonsten, bei alleiniger Prüfung der BK-Nr. 5103, herausgerechnet würden.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Though scientifically undisputed, cutaneous syncarcinogenesis is not reflected in German occupational disease (OD) regulations, which tend to be guided by the tenet of monocausality. Recognition of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and its precursor lesions as OD requires individual assessment as to whether the requirements pursuant to either OD 5103 (occupational exposure to natural UV radiation) or OD 5102 (occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are fulfilled. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 28 patients (median age 72.5 years) with NMSC and respective precursor lesions who had been occupationally exposed to natural UV radiation and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. All cases had undergone expert medical assessment between September 2012 and September 2015. RESULTS: According to our assessments, all 28 cases met the occupational requirements pursuant to OD 5103 and 5102. In 26 cases (93 %), we recommended recognition of skin cancer as occupational disease pursuant to both OD 5103 and OD 5102. The competent occupational insurance association (BG) followed our recommendation in four cases. In eight cases, recognition was solely based on OD 5103; in ten cases, only on OD 5102. Four cases were denied recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Following adequate cumulative occupational exposure to natural UV light as well as occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, NMSC or its precursor lesions arising in UV-exposed areas should be reported to the competent occupational insurance association as "OD 5103 and 5102 in terms of syncarcinogenesis". Apart from the fact that the ensuing recognition proceedings will be able to more adequately reflect real-life workplace conditions, filing a report pursuant to both ODs also allows for recognition of basal cell carcinoma as occupational disease. According to current regulations, this would not be possible, if the assessment were solely based on OD 5103.
Subject(s)
Carcinogens, Environmental/poisoning , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/poisoning , Precancerous Conditions/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Sunlight/adverse effects , Aged , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
Invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as a "quasi occupational disease" according to §9 Section 2 of the German Social Code Book (SGB) VII typically develops on chronically UV-damaged skin from actinic keratoses. After the Medical Scientific Committee of the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs has confirmed the legal criteria for acknowledging UV-induced SCC as an occupational disease, it is expected that the condition will be added to the official list of occupational diseases issued by the Federal Government in the near future. The Social Accident Insurance is required by law (§3 Occupational Disease Regulation) to prevent these tumors by "all appropriate means". There are excellent therapeutic and preventive measures for the management of actinic keratoses to avoid the development of SCC. The "Dermatologist's Procedure" according to §§ 41-43 of the agreement between the Social Accident Insurance and the Federal Medical Association was established in Germany in 1972 to take preventive measures in insured persons with skin lesions possibly developing into an occupational disease, or worsening it, or leading to a recurrence of it This procedure proved to be very successful in the prevention of severe and/or recurring skin diseases forcing a worker to leave his job. On the basis of this agreement, the Social Accident Insurance has the instruments to independently provide preventive measures for the new occupational skin disease SCC induced by natural UV light according to §9 Section 2 of the German Social Code Book (SGB) VII.
Subject(s)
Fees, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention/economics , Secondary Prevention/legislation & jurisprudence , Skin Neoplasms/economics , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Solar Energy , Sunlight/adverse effects , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatology/standards , Occupational Medicine/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Referral and Consultation/standards , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/therapy , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/therapy , Documentation/standards , Expert Testimony/standards , Germany , Humans , Insurance, Accident , Patch Tests/standards , Workers' CompensationABSTRACT
The certification of experts is an important component in the overall concept of quality management in occupational dermatology. With the certificate "Occupational Dermatology (ABD)" the Task Force on Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) has developed a comprehensive CME concept in the field of medico-legal evaluations. The ABD seminars meet the current requirements of the statutory accident insurances and social welfare courts. The new CME seminar curriculum 2006 of the ABD takes into account the recent pioneering achievements in occupational dermatology, e.g. the Bamberg leaflet, the optimized dermatologic report and other prevention/early intervention measures. The ABD seminars (total of 21 hrs) are subdivided into 3 consecutive modules: basic, advanced and special seminar (7 hrs each). The seminars are interactive, based on practice-oriented discussions with experts from different disciplines (occupational dermatology, social law). The seminars should be attended in chronological order; there are no time limits during which they must be completed. Prerequisite for the certification is a specialist's degree in dermatology. To maintain the certificate it is expected to attend one of the newly-created ABD "quality management workshops" (7 hrs) within 5-year-intervals; these focus on interdisciplinary case discussions of the current legal regulations and recent social welfare court decisions. More than 400 dermatologists have already been certified by the ABD.
