Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a survival benefit associated with radial access compared with femoral access remains controversial. Objective: To assess whether there is a survival benefit when radial access is used instead of femoral access among patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 PCI centers in Canada. In total, 2292 patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI were enrolled between July 2011 and December 2018, with a 30-day follow-up. The primary analyses were conducted based on the intention-to-treat population. Interventions: Patients were randomized to radial access (n = 1136) or to femoral access (n = 1156) for PCI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Initially, the primary outcome was bleeding, but this outcome was modified to 30-day all-cause mortality following the recommendation of the granting agency. Secondary outcomes included recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-defined major or minor bleeding. Results: Among the 2292 patients enrolled, the mean (SD) age of the patients randomized to radial access was 61.6 (12.3) years and to femoral access was 62.0 (12.1) years, with 883 male patients in the radial access and 901 male patients in the femoral access group. The trial was stopped early following a futility analysis. Primary PCI was performed in 1082 of 1136 patients (95.2%) in the radial access group and 1109 of 1156 patients (95.9%) in the femoral access group. Bivalirudin was administered to 1001 patients (88.1%) in the radial access group and to 1068 patients (92.4%) in the femoral access group, whereas glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered in only 69 patients (6.1%) in the radial access group and 68 patients (5.9%) in the femoral access group. A vascular closure device was used in 789 patients (68.3%) in the femoral group. The primary outcome, 30-day all-cause mortality, occurred in 17 patients (1.5%) assigned to radial access and in 15 patients (1.3%) assigned to femoral access (relative risk [RR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.58-2.30; P = .69). There were no significant differences between patients assigned to radial and femoral access in the rates of reinfarction (1.8% vs 1.6%; RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.57-2.00; P = .83), stroke (1.0% vs 0.4%; RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 0.78-6.42; P = .12), and bleeding (1.4% vs 2.0%; RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-1.33; P = .28). Conclusions and Relevance: No significant differences were found for survival or other clinical end points at 30 days after the use of radial access vs femoral access in patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI. However, small absolute differences in end points cannot be definitively refuted given the premature termination of the trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01398254.

In-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients on warfarin undergoing primary PCI.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the safety and efficacy outcomes of patients on warfarin presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the outcomes and optimal management of STEMI patients on warfarin undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes were prospectively collected for 2,390 consecutive STEMI patients referred for primary PCI. Patients were stratified based on warfarin use at baseline. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of in-hospital bleeding (a composite of major bleeding or minor bleeding) according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) classification. Efficacy endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, as well as intracranial bleeding, cardiogenic shock, and length of stay. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine if warfarin was independently associated with bleeding and MACE. RESULTS: Warfarin patients (n = 59 vs. n = 2,331) were significantly older (73.2 years vs. 61.7 years; P < 0.01), and more likely to present as Killip Class IV (13.6% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.01). TIMI major/minor bleeding occurred in 30.4% of the warfarin patients and 14.2% of the control patients (P < 0.01). After adjustment warfarin was independently associated with an increased risk of bleeding (OR 2.08; P = 0.04). Warfarin patients also had an increased frequency of MACE (20.3% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.01), though this was not significant after adjustment (OR 2.00; P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: STEMI patients on warfarin referred for primary PCI are more likely to experience bleeding. New strategies are needed to optimize the management and minimize bleeding in this high-risk population.

Safety and Efficacy of a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Patient Population Study Comparing a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy With a Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy Within a Regional System.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of a pharmacoinvasive strategy compared with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the context of a real-world system. BACKGROUND: Primary PCI continues to be the optimal reperfusion therapy; however, in areas where PCI centers are not readily available, a pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed. METHODS: The University of Ottawa Heart Institute regional STEMI system provides a primary PCI strategy for patients presenting within a 90-km radius from the PCI center, and a pharmacoinvasive strategy for patients outside this limit. We included all confirmed STEMI patients between April 2009 and May 2011. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of mortality, reinfarction, or stroke and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: We identified 236 and 980 consecutive patients enrolled in pharmacoinvasive and primary PCI strategies, respectively. The median door-to-needle time was 31 min in the pharmacoinvasive group and the median door-to-balloon time was 95 min in the primary PCI group. In a multivariable model, there was no significant difference in the primary efficacy outcome (odds ratio: 1.54; p = 0.21); however, the propensity for more bleeding with a pharmacoinvasive strategy approached statistical significance (odds ratio: 2.02; p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of a STEMI system, a pharmacoinvasive strategy was associated with similar rates of the composite of mortality, reinfarction, or stroke as compared with a primary PCI strategy; however, there was a propensity for more bleeding with a pharmacoinvasive strategy.

Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Index Admission for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Disease (Insights from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute STEMI Registry).

The optimal management strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease has not been well established. In the present cohort study, we sought to examine the safety and efficacy of inhospital staged PCI for patients with STEMI and multivessel disease. We identified all patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI who were found to have multivessel disease (stenosis ≥50% in nonculprit vessel) and compared clinical outcomes in relation to the management strategy, staged versus culprit-only PCI, for nonculprit vessel disease. The primary outcome was mortality at 180 days, and secondary outcomes included mortality during the index hospitalization and at 30 days, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding. Of the 1,038 patients with STEMI meeting inclusion criteria, 259 (25%) underwent staged PCI and 779 (75%) culprit-only PCI during the index admission. Mortality at 180 days was 0.8% in patients with staged PCI and 5.0% in patients with culprit-only PCI (p = 0.003). The association between staged PCI and reduced mortality persisted after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics and angiographic variables between the 2 cohorts (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.02). The rates of inhospital reinfarction in the staged and culprit-only PCI cohorts were 0.8% versus 1.3% (p = 0.50), respectively, stent thrombosis 0.8% versus 1.3% (p = 0.50), and stroke 0.4% versus 1.3% (p = 0.31). There were no inhospital adverse events related to acute occlusion of a nonculprit vessel in either cohort. Staged PCI during index admission is a safe and effective revascularization strategy for patients with STEMI and multivessel disease.

Prophylactic warfarin therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the benefits of adding oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest adding oral anticoagulation to dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI when left ventricular apical akinesis or dyskinesis is present to prevent thromboembolic complications. The benefits of this triple therapy remain unknown. METHODS: We identified patients with anterior STEMI referred (PCI) between July 2004 and June 2010 with apical akinesis or dyskinesis on transthoracic echocardiography. We compared patients who were prescribed warfarin to patients who were not. We excluded patients with left ventricular thrombus, a separate need for oral anticoagulation, and previous intracranial bleeding. The primary outcome was a composite of net adverse clinical events (NACE) consisting of all-cause mortality, stroke, reinfarction, and major bleeding at 180 days. RESULTS: Among 460 patients who qualified, 131 were discharged on warfarin therapy and 329 without warfarin therapy. Dual-antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 99.2% of the patients in the warfarin group and for 97.6% of the patients in the no warfarin group (p = 0.46). Compared with patients in the no warfarin group, patients in the warfarin group had higher rates of NACE (14.7% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.001), death (5.4% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.04), stroke (3.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.02), and major bleeding (8.5% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001). By propensity score analysis, allocation to warfarin therapy was an independent predictor of NACE (odds ratio [OR]: 4.01, 95% confidence interval: 2.15 to 7.50, p < 0.0001). In a separate multivariable analysis, the OR of NACE remained significantly higher compared with patients who were not prescribed warfarin (OR: 3.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 7.22, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the addition of warfarin therapy after primary PCI in patients with apical akinesis or dyskinesis.

A comparative pharmacodynamic study of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAPITAL RELOAD study.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel in reducing cardiovascular events. This study sought to evaluate the effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on the pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients undergoing PPCI. METHODS: We measured platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours following ticagrelor bolus in patients previously loaded with clopidogrel (C+T) and in thienopyridine-naive patients (T) referred to our centre for PPCI. RESULTS: In total, 52 consecutive eligible patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled (27 C+T and 25 T). Baseline characteristics and mean baseline platelet reactivity units (PRUs) were similar between the groups. The primary endpoint, the proportion of patients achieving a PRU<208 at 2 hours, was more frequently achieved in the C+T group compared to T treatment (76.0% vs 44.4%, p= 0.026). Notably, C+T therapy resulted in fewer patients with high platelet reactivity at 1 hour (56.0% vs. 14.8%), 4 hours (100.0% vs. 61.5%) and 6 hours (100.0% vs. 64%, p<0.01 for all comparisons). Furthermore, C+T therapy was associated with lower PRU values from 2 to 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for PPCI, ticagrelor bolus following clopidogrel resulted in more rapid and profound platelet inhibition, demonstrating a positive pharmacodynamic interaction. Further study is needed to determine if this pharmacodynamic effect translates into reduced clinical events.

The impact of therapeutic hypothermia as adjunctive therapy in a regional primary PCI program.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is associated with improved neurologic outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). There are currently limited data on the outcomes of patients presenting with resuscitated OHCA in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We conducted a retrospective study to determine the outcomes of patients treated with TH for OHCA in a large regionalized STEMI program. METHODS: Patients referred for primary PCI and TH between July 2004 and April 2011 were identified from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute STEMI database. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge with sufficient neurologic recovery to enable discharge home. RESULTS: Among 2467 consecutive patients referred for primary PCI, we identified 50 patients treated with TH following OHCA. Forty-nine underwent PCI, of which 47 (96%) received a stent. Median door-to-balloon time was 113min (IQR 91-151). Patients with good neurologic recovery were younger, mean 51 ± 9 years versus 64 ± 12, p<0.001, and had higher baseline creatinine clearance, 70 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus 53 ± 23 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p=0.007. The primary endpoint of survival with sufficient neurologic recovery to enable discharge home was reached in 30 patients (60%). Four survivors required levels of assistance that precluded discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic hypothermia in conjunction with primary PCI is associated with a favorable neurologic outcome in the majority of STEMI patients surviving OHCA. Our results suggest that TH is an important adjunctive therapy for STEMI patients suffering OHCA.

Bivalirudin for primary percutaneous coronary interventions: outcome assessment in the Ottawa STEMI registry.

BACKGROUND: Data from randomized trials has demonstrated the superiority of bivalirudin to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus heparin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Real-world performance of bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and the benefit of bivalirudin over heparin remain unknown in an era of routine dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From July 2004 to December 2010, 2317 consecutive patients were indexed in the University of Ottawa Heart Institute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction registry. During this period 748 patients received bivalirudin, 699 patients received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and 676 patients received unfractionated heparin alone. The primary outcome was the rate of noncoronary artery bypass graft related thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding. Bivalirudin significantly reduced the primary outcome compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (2.7% versus 7.3%, adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI: 1.61-5.45, P<0.001) and the composite end point of death, stroke, reinfarction and major bleed (OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.12-2.45, P=0.01). Compared with heparin alone, a reduction in major bleeds (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.60-2.44, P=0.59) or the composite end point (1.05, 95% CI: 0.68-1.63, P=0.83) with bivalirudin could not be demonstrated. Notably, major bleeding was associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk of mortality both in-hospital (3.5% versus 20.6%) and out to 180 days (5.6% versus 25.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin use compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus heparin as an antithrombotic strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention results in less major bleeding in contemporary practice. A benefit of bivalirudin over heparin could not be established with this registry and requires additional investigations to either confirm or refute.

Reduction in mortality as a result of direct transport from the field to a receiving center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether mortality complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was impacted by the design of transport systems. BACKGROUND: It is recommended that regions develop systems to facilitate rapid transfer of STEMI patients to centers equipped to perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet the impact on mortality from the design of such systems remains unknown. METHODS: Within the framework of a citywide system where all STEMI patients are referred for primary PCI, we compared patients referred directly from the field to a PCI center to patients transported beforehand from the field to a non-PCI-capable hospital. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 180 days. RESULTS: A total of 1,389 consecutive patients with STEMI were assessed by the emergency medical services (EMS) and referred for primary PCI: 822 (59.2%) were referred directly from the field to a PCI center, and 567 (40.8%) were transported to a non-PCI-capable hospital first. Death at 180 days occurred in 5.0% of patients transferred directly from the field, and in 11.5% of patients transported from the field to a non-PCI-capable hospital (p < 0.0001. After adjusting for baseline characteristics in a multivariable logistic regression model, mortality remained lower among patients referred directly from the field to the PCI center (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 0.88, p = 0.01). Similar results were obtained by using propensity score methods for adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A STEMI system allowing EMS to transport patients directly to a primary PCI center was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Our results support the concept of STEMI systems that include pre-hospital referral by EMS.

Lessons Learned from the Ottawa Regional STEMI Program.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the dominant strategy for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when rapid access to a catheterization facility is available. In communities where primary PCI is not feasible, a pharmacoinvasive strategy has become a recommended option. At the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, a care delivery model has been developed in which primary PCI and pharmacoinvasive strategies are applied for an entire region. This article reviews the lessons learned in setting up and maintaining a regional STEMI program.