ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia gives superior outcomes for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of available data regarding contemporary general anesthesia (GA) approaches for revision TJA utilized at high-volume joint arthroplasty centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 850 consecutive revision TJAs (405 revision total hip arthroplasties and 445 revision total knee arthroplasties) performed over 4 years at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and reported on the lengths of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the revision arthroplasty patients, 74.4% (632 of 850) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 68.5% (582 of 850) of subjects were able to participate in physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.7%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 11.3% (n = 96), while the reoperation rate was 9.4% (n = 80). CONCLUSIONS: While neuraxial anesthesia is commonly preferred when performing revision TJA, we have demonstrated favorable safety and efficiency metrics utilizing GA in conjunction with contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that modern GA techniques can be successfully used in revision TJA.
ABSTRACT
Patients with malignancy are often profoundly immunocompromised due to chemotherapy, placing them at potential increased risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is little information regarding PJI management in these patients. We describe 4 patients with a history of primary total knee arthroplasty followed by diagnosis of multiple myeloma or Waldenström macroglobulinemia who received chemotherapy within 4 months prior to PJI. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society major and minor criteria and either debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention or a 2-stage approach appear to be effective for acute or chronic PJI, respectively. We recommend an anticoagulant be administered concomitantly with antineoplastics that significantly increase deep vein thrombosis risk, and we recommend long-term oral suppressive antibiotics postoperatively, especially if chemotherapy will be resumed. Additional studies are needed to investigate risks and benefits of PJI prophylaxis during chemotherapy and long-term suppressive antibiotics after PJI treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple papers have purported the superiority of spinal anesthesia used in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a paucity of data available for modern general anesthesia (GA) regimens used at high-volume joint replacement centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 1527 consecutive primary TJAs (644 total hip arthroplasties and 883 total knee arthroplasties) performed over a 3-year span at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and report on the length of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: From the elective TJAs performed using a modern GA protocol, 96.3% (n = 1471) of patients discharged on postoperative day 1, and 97.2% (n = 1482) of subjects were able to participate with physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.4%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 2.4% (n = 36), while the reoperation rate was 1.3% (n = 20). DISCUSSION: Neuraxial anesthesia for TJA is commonly preferred in high-volume institutions utilizing contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that the utilization of modern GA techniques that limit narcotics and certain inhalants can be successfully used in short-stay primary total joint arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV- Case series.
