Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfusion ; 52(10): 2225-33, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22320233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cellular therapy studies are often conducted at multiple clinical sites to accrue larger patient numbers. In many cases this necessitates use of localized good manufacturing practices facilities to supply the cells. To assure consistent quality, oversight by a quality assurance group is advisable. In this study we report the findings of such a group established as part of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) studies involving use of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (ABMMCs) to treat myocardial infarction and heart failure. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Factors affecting cell manufacturing time were studied in 269 patients enrolled on three CCTRN protocols using automated cell processing system (Sepax, Biosafe SA)-separated ABMMCs. The cells were prepared at five good manufacturing practices cell processing facilities and delivered to local treatment sites or more distant satellite centers. RESULTS: Although the Sepax procedure takes only 90 minutes, the total time for processing was approximately 7 hours. Contributing to this were incoming testing and device preparation, release testing, patient randomization, and product delivery. The mean out-of-body time (OBT), which was to be less than 12 hours, averaged 9 hours. A detailed analysis of practices at each center revealed a variety of factors that contributed to this OBT. CONCLUSION: We conclude that rapid cell enrichment procedures may give a false impression of the time actually required to prepare a cellular therapy product for release and administration. Institutional procedures also differ and can contribute to delays; however, in aggregate it is possible to achieve an overall manufacturing and testing time that is similar at multiple facilities.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Cells , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Cell Separation/methods , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Regenerative Medicine , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Automation , Bone Marrow Cells/microbiology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Cell Separation/instrumentation , Cell Survival , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/methods , Colony-Forming Units Assay , Consumer Product Safety , Cryopreservation , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Preservation, Biological , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Time Factors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/statistics & numerical data , Transportation
2.
Cytotherapy ; 12(5): 684-91, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20524773

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background aims. Multicenter cellular therapy clinical trials require the establishment and implementation of standardized cell-processing protocols and associated quality control (QC) mechanisms. The aims here were to develop such an infrastructure in support of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) and to report on the results of processing for the first 60 patients. Methods. Standardized cell preparations, consisting of autologous bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells, prepared using a Sepax device, were manufactured at each of the five processing facilities that supported the clinical treatment centers. Processing staff underwent centralized training that included proficiency evaluation. Quality was subsequently monitored by a central QC program that included product evaluation by the CCTRN biorepositories. Results. Data from the first 60 procedures demonstrated that uniform products, that met all release criteria, could be manufactured at all five sites within 7 h of receipt of BM. Uniformity was facilitated by use of automated systems (the Sepax for processing and the Endosafe device for endotoxin testing), standardized procedures and centralized QC. Conclusions. Complex multicenter cell therapy and regenerative medicine protocols can, where necessary, successfully utilize local processing facilities once an effective infrastructure is in place to provide training and QC.


Subject(s)
Cell Culture Techniques/standards , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Automation, Laboratory , Bone Marrow/pathology , Cell Count , Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Cell Separation/methods , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/economics , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Laboratory Proficiency Testing , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Control , Regenerative Medicine/methods , Validation Studies as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...