Effects of instructions on physical capacities outcome in a workers' compensation setting.

UNLABELLED: Physical Capacity Evaluations (PCE) are often used in Pain Management Programs (PMP) to help determine patients' return-to-work status, continued rehabilitation and compensation. STUDY DESIGN: Groups of patients participating in a 4-week PMP were given the PCE upon entry to the program and again near discharge. Change in performance between the first and second testing was examined. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to examine the effects of instructions on patients' performance on the PCE. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An extensive literature suggests that, although commonly used, the PCE is of questionable validity in measuring actual physical capacity. METHODS: Patients were assigned to one of 2 physical therapists and given a PCE (in this setting, a dynamic vs static strength test) on admission and near the time of discharge. The assessment by the 2 therapists differed in the instructions they gave their patients for the PCE. Both therapists told their groups, "Do the best you can," but only one therapist added, "This test will be used to determine your job classification." In the second half of the study both therapists gave identical instructions, "Do the best you can," and did not add the explanation. RESULTS: Patients who were informed that the test would be used to determine their job classifications performed considerably worse than those not so informed. When both therapists gave the same instructions, groups performed comparably, suggesting that therapist variables did not explain the differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Instructions on the PCE have an effect on performance.

Near infrared spectroscopic analysis of forage samples digested in situ (nylon bag).

The objective was to investigate the feasibility of using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to determine the composition of samples generated in situ. Five alfalfa and five orchardgrass hays of differing maturities were incubated for 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h (Experiment 1) or for 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h (Experiment 2) in rumen-fistulated, lactating cows, using nylon bags. After washing to remove rumen contents, samples were analyzed using a nonrotating circular cell in a scanning monochromator. All samples then were dried at 55 degrees C and analyzed for CP and ADF by wet chemistry and rescanned in the dry state. The degree of DM digestion of the original sample was calculated from duplicate bags. Results for spectral analysis of dried samples (Experiment 1), with one-half the samples for validation, were typical of results found for dry forages. The results for scanning wet samples were less accurate than for dry ones. Analysis of samples from Experiment 2 by equations developed in Experiment 1 often resulted in extremely large biases, but these were corrected by including six samples of each forage from Experiment 2 in the calibration set (from Experiment 1) and redeveloping the equations. Although it is possible to use near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to determine the composition of wet samples generated in situ, results are more accurate if the samples are scanned after drying.

Dairy animal welfare. Introduction.

Organizations devoted to proper animal care have focused the attention of society on humane animal treatment. In recent years, some groups have raised questions as to what constitutes proper animal care on the farm and in the research laboratory. Philosophical questions about animal rights have been raised. Several groups are active in the animal welfare, animal rights arena and they vary widely in their objectives and methods of operation. Many of these groups are well-funded. Some resort to civil disobedience to achieve their ends. Farm animal commodity groups, animal-oriented research agencies, and animal-related industry groups have become increasingly aware of the public interest in animal welfare and are organizing programs and groups to better understand and educate the public on the issues.

Economic losses from and the national research program on mastitis in the United States.

Scientific papers estimating economic losses from mastitis were reviewed. Reduced milk production from cows with subclinical mastitis was responsible for the largest losses. Losses from mastitis in the United States in 1976 were estimated by usable responses to a survey from 33 states representing 9.5 million cows or 86% of the dairy cow population. Losses of milk yields caused by mastitis were 386 kg/cow per yr and losses of discarded milk 62 kg/cow per yr. Annual losses per cow from mastitis were a) reduced milk production, $81.32; b) discarded milk, $12.88; c) cost of veterinary services, $1.97; d) cost of drugs, !3,86; e) increased labor, $2.28; f) decreased sale value, $5.72; g) increased replacement costs, $9.32; h) total, $117.35. For the 11 million cows in the United States 1976 losses from mastitis were $1.294 billion. Mastitis research was supported publicly at 22 locations under 43 projects. Approximately 24 scientist years were involved and $2.7 million of public funds were expended annually. If economic losses from mastitis were reduced 2% per year for 10 yr by research and expenditures for mastitis research remained the same, the benefit to cost ratio from mastitis research would be approximately 9.6 to 1.