A major QTL for acute ethanol sensitivity in the alcohol tolerant and non-tolerant selected rat lines.

The Alcohol Tolerant and Alcohol Non-Tolerant rats (AT, ANT) were selectively bred for ethanol-induced ataxia as measured on the inclined plane. Here we report on a quantitative trait locus (QTL) study in an F(2) intercross population derived from inbred AT and ANT (IAT, IANT) and a follow-up study of congenics that were bred to examine one of the mapped QTLs. Over 1200 F(2) offspring were tested for inclined plane sensitivity, acute tolerance on the inclined plane, duration of the loss of righting reflex (LORR) and blood ethanol at regain of the righting reflex (BECRR). F(2) rats that were in the upper and lower 20% for inclined plane sensitivity were genotyped with 78 SSLP markers. Significant QTLs for inclined plane sensitivity were mapped on chromosomes 8 and 20; suggestive QTLs were mapped on chromosomes 1, 2 and 3. Highly significant QTLs for LORR duration (LOD = 12.4) and BECRR (LOD = 5.7) were mapped to the same locus on chromosome 1. Breeding and testing of reciprocal congenic lines confirmed the chromosome 1 LORR/BECRR QTL. A series of recombinant congenic sub-lines were bred to fine-map this QTL. Current results have narrowed the QTL to an interval of between 5 and 20 Mb. We expect to be able to narrow the interval to less than 5 Mb with additional genotyping and continued breeding of recombinant sub-congenic lines.

Phenotypic and genotypic relationships between ethanol tolerance and sensitivity in mice selectively bred for initial sensitivity to ethanol (SS and LS) or development of acute tolerance (HAFT and LAFT).

BACKGROUND: Genetically based risk for development of alcoholism in humans seems to be related to initial sensitivity and/or acute tolerance to ethanol. The genetic basis for the development of tolerance has received less attention than other ethanol-related behaviors. We have selected lines of mice, according to genetics, which are differentially sensitive to the initial hypnotic effect of ethanol (Short Sleep and Long Sleep, SS and LS) and other lines that differentially develop acute functional tolerance to ethanol (High and Low Acute Functional Tolerance, HAFT and LAFT). We review reports of the relationship between initial sensitivity and two forms of tolerance as measured using different behavioral measures and different time scales. The goal of the study was to investigate alcohol tolerance as measured by different behavioral tests conducted over different time periods and relate these variables to hypnotic sensitivity. METHODS: We investigated the phenotypic and genotypic relationships between different measures of tolerance to ethanol in the SS and LS mice. We used two measures of tolerance: (a) The time an animal can remain on a stationary dowel or roto-rod at 5-min intervals up to 30 minutes after a single low dose of ethanol (Acute Single Dose Tolerance, ASDT-dowel or ASDT-roto-rod); and (b) The difference in blood ethanol levels taken when a mouse could repeatedly regain balance on a stationary dowel or roto-rod after successive doses of ethanol (Acute Functional tolerance, AFT-dowel or AFT-roto-rod). The time course in AFT was much longer, up to 2 hours. We carried out the same studies on the High and Low Acute Functional Tolerance (HAFT and LAFT) mice. RESULTS: SS and LS mice differ in hypnotic sensitivity as measured by sleep time, and they differ in all forms of acute tolerance that were measured except in AFT-dowel. Although there were phenotypic correlations between AFT-dowel and ASDT-roto-rod in the Heterogeneous Stock (HS) of mice, provisional Quantitative Trait Loci (determined with Recombinant Inbred mice from a SS X LS cross) for the two phenotypes did not overlap, which indicated that there was little or no genetic correlation between the measures. HAFT and LAFT mice do not differ in hypnotic sensitivity as measured by sleep time measurements nor in ataxic sensitivity as measured on the dowel. The HAFT and LAFT mice both developed tolerance when tested in the 30-minute time frame, but the differences between the lines was largely in the rate of development of tolerance and not the amount developed. On the other hand, when tolerance was measured over 2 hr on the dowel or roto-rod, the HAFT and LAFT animals developed different levels of tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that measures of tolerance depended on both the time of ethanol's action and the behavioral task used. It seemed that the measures of tolerance used in this study had different genetic bases in mice. Presumably, tolerance will also vary in humans depending on the behavioral measure, and tolerance will also have different genetic bases for the different behavioral measures in humans.

Effect of administered ethanol on protein kinase C in human platelets.

There are numerous reports of the effect of ethanol on protein kinase C (PKC) in animals or with in vitro systems. However, the effect of ethanol on PKC in humans has not been extensively investigated despite the large number of studies involving PKC and human platelets. In this study, we administered ethanol to human volunteers and determined the level of PKC before and after a 0.4 g/kg dose of ethanol. We studied Native Americans and Caucasians of both sexes. There was an increases in PKC activity 60 min after ethanol administration. There were no ethnic, age, nor gender differences detected, nor was there any correlation between family history of alcoholism and the basal or stimulated platelet PKC levels. Neither was there any correlation of basal or stimulated PKC activity with the genotypes for ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2, CYP2E1, and CYP1A2.

Investigations of the role of protein kinase C in the acute sedative effects of ethanol.

The activity of protein kinase C (PKC) in whole brain and brain areas of mice selectively bred for resistance (short sleep, SS) or sensitivity (long sleep, LS) to the acute ataxic effect of ethanol has been investigated. The cytosolic and membrane fractions of whole brain PKC activities are significantly less in LS mice than in SS mice. There are significant differences in PKC activity between brain areas in both the SS and LS lines. Ethanol given in ataxic doses results in significantly increased amounts in PKC activity in whole brain cytosolic fractions and in some brain areas but equally in both SS and LS mice. Ethanol added in vitro reduced enzyme activity slightly in SS brain membranes, suggesting that the mechanism of the increase in PKC activity seen after in vivo administration is indirect. These results indicate that PKC is not involved in the mechanism whereby LS and SS mice differ in alcohol sensitivity. Direct intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), an activator of PKC, resulted in increased sleep times in both SS and LS mice. ICV injection of PMA also caused a more marked decrease in body temperature in LS than in SS mice. The half-life of PMA in brain was determined to be 9.6 hr and no metabolites could be detected. At limiting calcium concentrations, PMA added in vitro activated PKC equally well in both lines. However, PMA given ICV did not alter the level of PKC as determined in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Brain ascorbic acid levels: mice and rats selected for differences in acute reactions to ethanol.

There are variations of ascorbic acid levels in different brain areas of mice and rats. However, there are no differences in ascorbic acid levels between lines of mice selectively bred for differences in ethanol sensitivity for 25 generations. Thus, it is unlikely that brain ascorbic acid plays a significant role in the acute sedative effects of ethanol in these mice. Studies with inbred strains of mice known to differ in ethanol preference, acute sensitivity and withdrawal sensitivity also failed to reveal any differences in brain ascorbic acid levels. There were differences in ascorbic acid content between selectively bred lines of rats in various brain areas at generation five of selection.