Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 70(16): 1404-13, 2013 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23903479

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Consensus recommendations to help ensure safe insulin use in hospitalized patients are presented. SUMMARY: Insulin products are frequently involved in medication errors in hospitals, and insulin is classified as a high-alert medication when used in inpatient settings. In an initiative to promote safer insulin use, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Research and Education Foundation convened a 21-member panel representing the fields of pharmacy, medicine, and nursing and consumer advocacy groups for a three-stage consensus-building initiative. The panel's consensus recommendations include the following: development of protocol-driven insulin order sets, elimination of the routine use of correction/sliding-scale insulin doses for management of hyperglycemia, restrictions on the types of insulin products stored in patient care areas, and policies to restrict the preparation of insulin bolus doses and i.v. infusions to the pharmacy department. In addition, the panelists recommended that hospitals better coordinate insulin use with meal intake and glucose testing, prospectively monitor the coordination of insulin delivery and rates of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and provide standardized education and competency assessment for all hospital-based health care professionals responsible for insulin use. CONCLUSION: A 21-member expert panel convened by the ASHP Foundation identified 10 recommendations for enhancing insulin-use safety across the medication-use process in hospitals. Professional organizations, accrediting bodies, and consumer groups can play a critical role in the translation of these recommendations into practice. Rigorous research studies and program evaluations are needed to study the impact of implementation of these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Insulin/therapeutic use , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Societies, Pharmaceutical , Consensus , Humans
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(1): 90-4, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20006209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in US emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We analyzed visits from the 1993 to 2005 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, seen by midlevel provider (MLP), and compared characteristics of MLP visits to those seen by physicians only. RESULTS: From 1993 to 2005, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.6%-5.8%) of US ED visits were seen by PAs and 1.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.0%) by NPs. During the study period, PA visits rose from 2.9% to 9.1%, whereas NP visits rose from 1.1% to 3.8% (both P(trend) < .001). Compared to physician only visits, those seen only by MLPs arrived by ambulance less frequently (6.0% vs 15%), had lower urgent acuity (37% vs 59%), and were admitted less often (3.0% vs 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Midlevel provider use has increased in US EDs. Their involvement in some urgent visits and those requiring admission suggests that the role of MLPs extends beyond minor presentations.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Physician Assistants/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Workforce , Young Adult
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 27(6): 691-700, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751626

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to describe the current status of the emergency medicine workforce in the United States. METHODS: Surveys were distributed in 2008 to 2619 emergency department (ED) medical directors and nurse managers in hospitals in the 2006 American Hospital Association database. RESULTS: Among ED medical directors, 713 responded, for a 27.2% response rate. Currently, 65% of practicing emergency physicians are board certified by the American Board of Emergency Medicine or the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine. Among those leaving the practice, the most common reasons cited for departure include geographic relocation (46%) and better pay (29%). Approximately 12% of the ED physician workforce is expected to retire in the next 5 years. Among nurse managers, 548 responded, for a 21% response rate. Many nurses (46%) have an associate degree as their highest level of education, 28% have a BSN, and 3% have a graduate degree (MSN or higher). Geographic relocation (44%) is the leading reason for changing employment. Emergency department annual volumes have increased by 49% since 1997, with a mean ED volume of 32 281 in 2007. The average reported ED length of stay is 158 minutes from registration to discharge and 208 minutes from registration to admission. Emergency department spent an average of 49 hours per month in ambulance diversion in 2007. Boarding is common practice, with an average of 318 hours of patient boarding per month. CONCLUSIONS: In the past 10 years, the number of practicing emergency physicians has grown to more than 42 000. The number of board-certified emergency physicians has increased. The number of annual ED visits has risen significantly.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Certification/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , United States , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...