Deficits in muscle strength are not seen following recovery from augmented primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament tears.

OBJECTIVES: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for proximal tears, where the ligament is re-attached and augmented with suture tape, can negate the need for graft harvest, thereby maintaining native anatomy. Autograft harvest has been associated with persistent deficits in lower limb muscle strength after recovery from ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare lower limb muscle strength following ACL repair and reconstruction. METHODS: Nineteen ACL repair patients augmented with suture tape and nineteen ipsilateral semitendinosus-gracilis autograft ACL reconstruction patients (both mean 4 years postoperatively) were recruited, along with twenty healthy volunteers. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, and Tegner scores. Maximal isometric quadriceps and hamstring strength at 90° knee flexion were measured using a fixed Myometer after a warm-up and three maximal-effort contractions. RESULTS: Mean hamstring strength of the reconstructed legs was lower than that of healthy volunteers by 0.29 Nm/kg. The hamstring strength ratio of the operated side to the uninjured side was greater in the repair (95% â€‹± â€‹13) than in the reconstruction (81% â€‹± â€‹18) group. There were no statistically significant differences between sides for quadriceps peak torque or for hamstrings in the volunteer or repair group. PROMs scores for the reconstruction group were significantly lower than volunteers across all domains and lower than repair for KOOS activities of daily living and Lysholm scores. CONCLUSION: Hamstring weakness seen following ACL reconstruction is not evident following ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. Strength asymmetry could contribute to re-injury risk and influence functional performance, while altered loads affect knee biomechanics and may lead to osteoarthritis progression. The absence of these deficits in the repair group demonstrates a potential benefit of this technique when used in appropriate patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of secondary surgery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation in comparison to conventional hamstring ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that there would be no differences between the groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison study of patients undergoing ACL surgery between September 2011 and April 2018. Two hundred and 73 patients underwent ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. During the same timeframe, 137 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture underwent ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. One patient was lost to follow-up in the ACL reconstruction group leaving 272 patients (99.6%) for the final analysis. In the ACL repair group, three patients were lost to follow-up leaving 134 patents (97.8%) for the final analysis. Secondary surgery was identified by contacting the patients by email/telephone and reviewing patient notes at the time of this analysis. RESULTS: Re-rupture occurred in 32 patients (11.8%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to 22 patients (16.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.194). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to three patients (2.2%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.224). In the ACL reconstruction group, nine patients (3.3%) required secondary meniscal surgery whilst five patients (3.7%) required meniscal surgery in the ACL repair group (p = 0.830). Seven other operations were performed in the ACL reconstruction group (2.6%) compared to three other operations in the ACL repair group (2.2%) (p = 0.374). The overall number of patients undergoing secondary surgery in the ACL reconstruction group was 52 (19.1%) in comparison to 30 (22.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.114). CONCLUSION: ACL repair with suture tape augmentation for acute proximal ruptures demonstrated comparable rates of secondary surgery with hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique. METHODS: All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity. RESULTS: Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% - 14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.

Quantifying graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) fail at a rate of 10-15%, with graft impingement often a cause. In this study we investigate the prevalence and causes of impingement seen during ACLR surgery. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive primary ACLR from 2012-2018. Graft impingement was estimated intraoperatively by placing the arthroscope through the tibial tunnel and passively extending the knee, observing how much was obscured by the lateral femoral condyle from an anterior and lateral direction. Preoperative MRI scans were used to measure the intercondylar notch; Notch Width Index (NWI) and Notch Depth Index (NDI). Positioning of the tunnels was determined on postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: There were 283 ACLRs performed with 33 failures diagnosed on MRI (11.7%). 257 patients had complete imaging and follow up (91%). The mean age was 28 (±9) years and mean follow-up 5.3 (±1.8) years. The mean NWI was 0.26(±0.03), and NDI was 0.49(±0.06). The tibial tunnel aperture was located 42(±6) % of the way from anterior-posterior and 39(±6) % from medial-lateral. Impingement requiring a notchplasty was observed in 80% of cases, with lateral impingement more prominent. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of impingement did not correlate with tunnel position, which was located within the recommended area. There was a weak negative correlation between NWI and lateral impingement (rs = -0.16, p = 0.01), and NDI and anterior impingement (rs = -0.12, p = 0.04), therefore a smaller notch is associated with greater impingement. Despite optimal tunnel positioning, impingement still occurs in a significant number of cases therefore notchplasty should always be considered to keep revision rates low.

A systematic review of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prosthesis design and type should be reported.

AIMS: Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) promises accurate implant placement with the potential of improved survival and functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to present the current evidence for robotic-assisted UKA and describe the outcome in terms of implant positioning, range of movement (ROM), function and survival, and the types of robot and implants that are currently used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and Medline was performed in October 2018 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included "robotic", "knee", and "surgery". The criteria for inclusion was any study describing the use of robotic UKA and reporting implant positioning, ROM, function, and survival for clinical, cadaveric, or dry bone studies. RESULTS: A total of 528 articles were initially identified from the databases and reference lists. Following full text screening, 38 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. In all, 20 studies reported on implant positioning, 18 on functional outcomes, 16 on survivorship, and six on ROM. The Mako (Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey) robot was used in 32 studies (84%), the BlueBelt Navio (Blue Belt Technologies, Plymouth, Minnesota) in three (8%), the Sculptor RGA (Stanmore Implants, Borehamwood United Kingdom) in two (5%), and the Acrobot (The Acrobot Co. Ltd., London, United Kingdom) in one study (3%). The most commonly used implant was the Restoris MCK (Stryker). Nine studies (24%) did not report the implant that was used. The pooled survivorship at six years follow-up was 96%. However, when assessing survival according to implant design, survivorship of an inlay (all-polyethylene) tibial implant was 89%, whereas that of an onlay (metal-backed) implant was 97% at six years (odds ratio 3.66, 95% confidence interval 20.7 to 6.46, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is little description of the choice of implant when reporting robotic-assisted UKA, which is essential when assessing survivorship, in the literature. Implant positioning with robotic-assisted UKA is more accurate and more reproducible than that performed manually and may offer better functional outcomes, but whether this translates into improved implant survival in the mid- to longer-term remains to be seen. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:838-847.

Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. METHODS: A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery. RESULTS: From the first post-operative day through to week 8 post-operatively, the median pain scores for the robotic arm-assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the manual surgery group (p = 0.040).At three months post-operatively, the robotic arm-assisted group had better AKSS (robotic median 164, interquartile range (IQR) 131 to 178, manual median 143, IQR 132 to 166), although no difference was noted with the OKS.At one year post-operatively, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from a median of 21 points to a median of seven points (p = 0.106) (robotic median 171, IQR 153 to 179; manual median 164, IQR 144 to 182). No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43). A greater proportion of patients receiving robotic arm-assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score.Binary logistic regression modelling for dichotomised outcome scores predicted the key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS: a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of robotic-arm surgery. For the same regression modelling, factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression. CONCLUSION: Robotic arm-assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient-reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed at one year post-operatively. Although improved results favoured the robotic arm-assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA ⩾ 5), these do not withstand adjustment for multiple comparisons.Cite this article: M. J. G. Blyth, I. Anthony, P. Rowe, M. S. Banger, A. MacLean, B. Jones. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:631-639. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1.

A comparison of lateral release rates in fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With increasing functional demands of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, mobile-bearing (MB) implants were developed in an attempt to increase the functional outcome of such patients. In theory, with MB implants, the self-alignment should reduce the rate of lateral release of the patella, which is usually performed to optimise patellofemoral mechanics. This study reports on the lateral release rates for the P.F.C. Sigma® MB posterior-stabilised total knee replacement (TKR) implant compared with its fixed-bearing (FB) equivalent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 352 patients undergoing TKR were randomly allocated to receive either MB (176 knees) or FB (176 knees) posterior-stabilised TKR. Further sub-randomisation into patellar resurfacing or retention was performed for both designs. The need for lateral patellar release was assessed during surgery using a 'no thumb technique', and after releasing the tourniquet if indicated. RESULTS: The lateral release rate was the same for FB (10 %) and MB implants (10 %) (p = 0.9). However, patellar resurfacing resulted in lower lateral release rates when compared to patellar retention (6 vs 14 %; p = 0.0179) especially in MB implants (3 %). CONCLUSIONS: It has been previously reported that alterations to the design of the P.F.C. system with a more anatomical trochlea in the femoral component improved patellar tracking. The addition of a rotating platform tibial component to the P.F.C. Sigma system has, on its own, had no impact on the lateral release rate in this study. Optimising patellar geometry by patellar resurfacing appears more important than tibial-bearing design. Although MB implants appear to reduce the need for lateral release in the P.F.C. Sigma Rotating Platform, this only occurs when the patellar geometry has been optimised with patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Influence of low back pain on total knee arthroplasty outcome.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative pain and functional status are strong determinants of postsurgical success in total knee arthroplasty. Patients suffering chronic pain from other coexistent musculoskeletal problems may respond differently postoperatively, with potentially poorer outcomes after surgery. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of low back pain on the outcome of total knee replacement surgery. METHODS: All patients completed Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), American Knee Society Scores (AKSS) and SF-12 (both physical and mental components). Patients were divided into those with (n=40) and without a documented history of low back pain (n=305). RESULTS: OKS, AKSS and SF-12 physical scores were significantly worse for patients with low back pain at 24 months following surgery. The mental component of the SF-12 measure demonstrated a significant improvement in median mental health post-operatively for patients with no current history of low back pain. In contrast the group with low back pain showed no improvement in mental health scores post-operatively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that symptomatic low back pain influences functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty surgery and that patients with low back pain show limited or no improvement in mental health post-operatively. Level of evidence II.

MRSA colonisation and subsequent risk of infection despite effective eradication in orthopaedic elective surgery.

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of screening and successful treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation in elective orthopaedic patients on the subsequent risk of developing a surgical site infection (SSI) with MRSA. We screened 5933 elective orthopaedic in-patients for MRSA at pre-operative assessment. Of these, 108 (1.8%) were colonised with MRSA and 90 subsequently underwent surgery. Despite effective eradication therapy, six of these (6.7%) had an SSI within one year of surgery. Among these infections, deep sepsis occurred in four cases (4.4%) and superficial infection in two (2.2%). The responsible organism in four of the six cases was MRSA. Further analysis showed that patients undergoing surgery for joint replacement of the lower limb were at significantly increased risk of an SSI if previously colonised with MRSA. We conclude that previously MRSA-colonised patients undergoing elective surgery are at an increased risk of an SSI compared with other elective patients, and that this risk is significant for those undergoing joint replacement of the lower limb. Furthermore, when an infection occurs, it is likely to be due to MRSA.

Iatrogenic nerve injury with the Russell-Taylor humeral nail.

The first consecutive 51 humeral shaft fractures treated with the Russell-Taylor intramedullary nail at Glasgow Royal Infirmary were reviewed in a retrospective study. There were eight iatrogenic nerve injuries- three to the radial nerve which settled spontaneously and five to the lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm of which three have failed to recover completely. The authors feel that the insertion of the distal interlocking screw in the antero-posterior direction puts this nerve at risk. We believe that iatrogenic injury to the lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm during humeral nailing has not been previously reported.