Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 170(6): 665-9; discussion 669-70, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7492023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Implanted venous access port infection can be difficult to diagnose and treat. If device removal is necessary, confirming port infection is problematic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Culture specimens from three sites, catheter tip (Tip), port pocket, and the material within the reservoir (Inside), were sent from ports removed for potential infection. The results of these cultures were compared to preremoval peripheral and central blood cultures. RESULTS: Forty-five ports were removed for suspected infection. Confirmed port infection was defined as positive culture(s) from one or more experimental specimen(s). In 29 evaluable cases, the Inside specimens were completely predictive. Tip specimens were less accurate, even with a lower diagnostic threshold. In 7 of 19 confirmed infections, only the Inside culture was diagnostic. CONCLUSION: The most predictive culture specimen in a potentially infected port is the thrombotic material inside the reservoir.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Bacteria/growth & development , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Female , Fungi/growth & development , Humans , Infections/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...