Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(8): 102690, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821233

ABSTRACT

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are at increased risk of mortality, particularly due to cardiovascular events such as acute myocardial infarction. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are the two main treatment modalities for ESRD patients. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we conducted a retrospective study involving 25,435 ESRD patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2016 and 2020, categorized by their dialysis regimen. Our analysis revealed comparable mortality rates between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients, but lower hospitalization costs and fewer complications among PD recipients. Over five years, we observed a notable decrease in STEMI mortality despite increased STEMI cases among HD patients. Conversely, HD patients experienced increased hospital stays and associated costs over the study period than PD patients, who demonstrated stable trends. This study highlights the implications of dialysis modality selection in managing costs and reducing morbidity among STEMI patients with ESRD.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Peritoneal Dialysis , Renal Dialysis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Peritoneal Dialysis/methods , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Survival Rate/trends
2.
Transplant Proc ; 56(1): 87-92, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199856

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 infection has worse outcomes in immunocompromised individuals. This includes those with diabetes mellitus, cancer, chronic autoimmune diseases requiring immunomodulatory therapy, and solid-organ transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Using the National Inpatient Sample Database, this study retrospectively compared 14,915 renal transplant recipients who were hospitalized with either COVID-19 or Influenza virus infection in the US at any point between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2020. We found that compared to renal transplant recipients with influenza infection, recipients with COVID-19 infection were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support and develop acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. COVID-19 patients also had significantly longer length of hospital stay. Renal transplant recipients with COVID-19 had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to recipients with influenza infection (14.09% vs 2.61%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.73 [95% CI (5.74-16.52)], P < .001). Our study clearly demonstrates the severe outcomes of high mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19. Further research should be undertaken to focus on the key areas noted to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , United States/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Transplant Recipients
3.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(2): 102246, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of readmission and mortality, particularly within 30 days post-discharge. The interplay between COVID-19 and HF is still being studied. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized The National Readmission Database to examine outcomes and predictors among patients with COVID-19 and concomitant acute HF between January 1, 2020, and November 31, 2020. 53,336 index hospitalizations and 8,158 readmissions were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause readmission rate. Predictor variables included patient demographics, medical comorbidities and discharge disposition. RESULTS: The primary outcome was 21.2 %. COVID-19 infection was the most predominant all-cause reason for acute HF readmission (24.7 %). Hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease was the most prevalent cardiac cause (7.7 %). Mortality rate during index hospitalization was significantly higher compared to readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighted prevalent complications, comorbidities, and demographics driving readmissions offer valuable insights to improve outcomes in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Humans , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , Aftercare , Pandemics , Patient Discharge , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Risk Factors
4.
Pancreatology ; 23(8): 935-941, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925334

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal-related hospitalization, with significant morbidity and mortality. SARS-COV-2 virus can access the pancreas via angiotensin-converting enzymes and can cause direct and indirect injury to the pancreatic parenchyma. The objective of this study to understand clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without pancreatitis utilizing National Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: We utilized the United States National Inpatient Sample database to study clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection (a total of 1,659,040 hospitalized patients with 10,075 (0.6 %) with pancreatitis) between January 1 to December 31, 2020, along with propensity matching. RESULTS: While after propensity matching, we did not find a statistical difference in in-hospital mortality amongst COVID-19 patients with pancreatitis compared to COVID-19 patients without pancreatitis (13.2 % vs 10.3 %, adjusted odds ratio: 0.7 [95 % CI 0.5-1], p = 0.11). Patients with COVID-19 and pancreatitis had more episodes of septic shock, higher incidence of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. We also found an increased prevalence of NASH cirrhosis, alcohol liver cirrhosis, and a lesser incidence of pulmonary embolisms in the COVID-19 with pancreatitis cohort. CONCLUSION: Worse in-hospital outcomes, including increased incidence of septic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and pancreatitis, emphasize the need for more research to understand the effect of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized patients with pancreatitis and in the role of vaccination to improve long term outcome in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Pancreatitis , Shock, Septic , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Pancreatitis/etiology , Inpatients , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Acute Disease , Shock, Septic/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology
5.
Viruses ; 15(8)2023 08 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632042

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 infections can lead to worse outcomes in an immunocompromised population with multiple comorbidities, e.g., heart transplant patients. We used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare heart transplant outcomes in patients with COVID-19 vs. influenza. A total of 2460 patients were included in this study: heart transplant with COVID-19 (n = 1155, 47.0%) and heart transplant with influenza (n = 1305, 53.0%) with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality (n = 120) was significantly higher for heart transplant patients infected with COVID-19 compared to those infected with influenza (9.5% vs. 0.8%, adjusted OR: 51.6 [95% CI 4.3-615.9], p = 0.002) along with significantly higher rates of mechanical ventilation, acute heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and higher mean total hospitalization cost compared to the influenza group. More studies are needed on the role of vaccination and treatment to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Influenza, Human , United States/epidemiology , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Databases, Factual
6.
J Clin Med ; 12(4)2023 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36835876

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus-19, primarily a respiratory virus, also affects the nervous system. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a well-known complication among COVID-19 infections, but large-scale studies evaluating AIS outcomes related to COVID-19 infection remain limited. We used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare acute ischemic stroke patients with and without COVID-19. A total of 329,240 patients were included in the study: acute ischemic stroke with COVID-19 (n = 6665, 2.0%) and acute ischemic stroke without COVID-19 (n = 322,575, 98.0%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, mechanical thrombectomy, thrombolysis, seizure, acute venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, septic shock, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, length of stay, mean total hospitalization charge, and disposition. Acute ischemic stroke patients who were COVID-19-positive had significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared to acute ischemic stroke patients without COVID-19 (16.9% vs. 4.1%, aOR: 2.5 [95% CI 1.7-3.6], p < 0.001). This cohort also had significantly increased mechanical ventilation use, acute venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, septic shock, acute kidney injury, length of stay, and mean total hospitalization charge. Further research regarding vaccination and therapies will be vital in reducing worse outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19.

7.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(1)2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36679952

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 virus, since the detection of the first case in Wuhan in 2019, has caused a worldwide pandemic with significant human, economic and social costs. Fortunately, several vaccines and treatments, both IV and oral, are currently approved against the COVID-19 virus. Paxlovid is an oral treatment option for patients with mild-to-moderate disease, and it effectively reduces disease severity in high-risk patients. Paxlovid is an oral antiviral that consists of a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavi. As an oral medication suitable for outpatient treatment, it reduces the cost, hospitalization and mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. The pregnant population is a high-risk category for COVID-19 disease. Given their exclusion in clinical trials, there is limited data regarding Paxlovid use in pregnant and lactating women. Indirect evidence from ritonavir use as part of HAART therapy in the pregnant and lactating population with HIV has shown no significant teratogenicity. Moreover, animal studies on the use of nirmatrelvir do not suggest teratogenicity. This article summarizes the available data on ritonavir and nirmatrelvir use during pregnancy and in ongoing clinical trials. We also review the recommendations of major societies worldwide regarding Paxlovid use in pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

8.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(5): 101607, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690311

ABSTRACT

Takotsubo syndrome (stress cardiomyopathy) has become a well-known complication of COVID-19 infections, with limited large-scale studies evaluating outcomes. We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to compare COVID-19 patients with and without stress cardiomyopathy. A total of 1,659,040 patients were included in the study: COVID-19 with stress cardiomyopathy (n = 1665, 0.1%) and COVID-19 without stress cardiomyopathy (n = 1657, 375, and 99.9%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary analysis with propensity matching performed to confirm results from traditional multivariate analysis. COVID-19 patients with stress cardiomyopathy had significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared to COVID-19 patients without stress cardiomyopathy (32.8% vs 14.6%, adjusted OR [aOR]: 2.3 [95% CI, 1.2-4.5], P = 0.01) along with significantly increased mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support, hospitalization charge, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest. These results emphasize the need for more research to reduce worse outcomes with COVID-19-related stress cardiomyopathy patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Inpatients , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/complications , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/epidemiology , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Hospitalization , Shock, Cardiogenic
9.
Infect Dis Rep ; 15(1): 55-65, 2023 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36648860

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare delivery to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the effect of COVID-19 on inpatient STEMI outcomes and to investigate changes in cardiac care delivery during 2020. We utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to examine inpatient mortality and cardiac procedures among STEMI patients with and without COVID-19. In our study, STEMI patients with COVID-19 had higher inpatient mortality (47.4% vs. 11.2%, aOR: 3.8, 95% CI: 3.2−4.6, p < 0.001), increased length of stay (9.0 days vs. 4.3 days, p < 0.001) and higher cost of hospitalization (USD 172,518 vs. USD 131,841, p = 0.004) when compared to STEMI patients without COVID-19. STEMI patients with COVID-19 also received significantly less invasive cardiac procedures (coronary angiograms: 30.4% vs. 50.8%, p < 0.001; PCI: 32.9% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001; CABG: 0.9% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to receive systemic thrombolytic therapy (4.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) when compared to STEMI patients without COVID-19. Our findings are the result of complications of SARS-CoV2 infection as well as alterations in healthcare delivery due to the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

10.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(2): 101481, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36356700

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), while primarily a respiratory virus, affects multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system. The relationship between COVID-19 and Myocarditis has been well established, but there are limited large-scale studies evaluating outcome of COVID-19 related Myocarditis. Using National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we compared patients with Myocarditis with and without COVID-19 infection. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, cardiogenic shock, mechanical circulatory support, sudden cardiac arrest, and length of hospitalization. A total of 17,970 patients were included in study; Myocarditis without COVID (n = 11,515, 64%) and Myocarditis with COVID-19 (n = 6,455, 36%). Patients with COVID-19 and Myocarditis had higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with Myocarditis alone (30.7% vs 6.4%, odds ratio 4.8, 95% CI 3.7-6.3, P< 0.001). That cohort also had significantly higher rates of vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, sudden cardiac arrest, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. Given the poor outcome seen in COVID-19 related Myocarditis cohort, further work is needed for development of directed therapies for COVID-19-related Myocarditis.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Humans , Myocarditis/therapy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Hospitalization , Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy
11.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560434

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare delivery to patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI). The aim of our retrospective study is to determine the effect of COVID-19 on inpatient NSTEMI outcomes and to investigate whether changes in cardiac care contributed to the observed outcomes. After multivariate adjustment, we found that NSTEMI patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of inpatient mortality (37.3% vs. 7.3%, adjusted odds ratio: 4.96, 95% CI: 4.6−5.4, p < 0.001), increased length of stay (9.9 days vs. 5.4 days, adjusted LOS: 3.6 days longer, p < 0.001), and a higher cost of hospitalization (150,000 USD vs. 110,000 USD, inflation-adjusted cost of hospitalization: 36,000 USD higher, p < 0.001) in comparison to NSTEMI patients without COVID-19, despite a lower burden of pre-existing cardiac comorbidity. NSTEMI patients with COVID-19 also received less invasive cardiac procedures (coronary angiography: 8.7% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001; PCI: 4.8% vs. 29%, p < 0.001; and CABG: 0.7% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). In our study, we observed increased mortality and in-hospital complications to be a combined effect of COVID-19 infection and myocardial inflammation as a result of cytokine storm, prothrombic state, oxygen supply/demand imbalance and alterations in healthcare delivery from January to December 2020.

12.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560446

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has brought the disparities in health outcomes for patients to the forefront. Racial and gender identity are associated with prevalent healthcare disparities. In this study, we examine the health disparities in COVID-19 hospitalization outcome from the intersectional lens of racial and gender identity. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2020 NIS dataset for hospitalizations from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 was analyzed for primary outcome of in-patient mortality and secondary outcomes of intubation, acute kidney injury (AKI), AKI requiring hemodialysis (HD), cardiac arrest, stroke, and vasopressor use. A multivariate regression model was used to identify associations. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Men had higher rates of adverse outcomes. Native American men had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.0, CI 1.7−2.4) and intubation (aOR 1.8, CI 1.5−2.1), Black men had highest risk of AKI (aOR 2.0, CI 1.9−2.0). Stroke risk was highest in Asian/Pacific Islander women (aOR 1.5, p = 0.001). We note that the intersection of gender and racial identities has a significant impact on outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States with Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) men have higher risks of adverse outcomes.

13.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560514

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism, in particular, pulmonary embolism (PE), is a significant contributor to the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. In this study, we utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020 to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with and without PE. Our sample includes 1,659,040 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia between January 2020 and December 2020. We performed propensity-matched analysis for patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes, including the patient's age, race, sex, insurance status, median income, length of stay, mortality, hospitalization cost, comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Patients with COVID-19 with PE had a higher need for mechanical ventilation (25.7% vs. 15.6%, adjusted odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.4−1.5, p < 0.001), the vasopressor requirement (5.4% vs. 2.6%, adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4−1.8, p < 0.001), longer hospital stays (10.8 vs. 7.9 days, p < 0.001), and overall higher in-hospital mortality (19.1 vs. 13.9%, adjusted OR of 1.3, 95% CI 1.1−1.5, p < 0.001). This study highlights the need for more aggressive management of PE in COVID-19-positive patients with the aim to improve early diagnosis and treatment to reduce morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs seen in the synchronous COVID-19 and PE-positive patients.

14.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560569

ABSTRACT

This study aims to provide comparative data on clinical features and in-hospital outcomes among U.S. adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 and influenza infection using a nationwide inpatient sample (N.I.S.) data 2020. Data were collected on patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes, including patient's age, race, sex, insurance status, median income, length of stay, mortality, hospitalization cost, comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Additional analysis was performed using propensity matching. In propensity-matched cohort analysis, influenza-positive (and COVID-positive) patients had higher mean hospitalization cost (USD 129,742 vs. USD 68,878, p = 0.04) and total length of stay (9.9 days vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.01), higher odds of needing mechanical ventilation (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.19-3.39), and higher in-hospital mortality (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.03-4.24) relative to the COVID-positive and influenza-negative cohort. In conclusion, COVID-positive and influenza-negative patients had lower hospital charges, shorter hospital stays, and overall lower mortality, thereby supporting the use of the influenza vaccine in COVID-positive patients.

15.
Viruses ; 14(12)2022 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560794

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), preliminarily a respiratory virus, can affect multiple organs, including the heart. Myocarditis is a well-known complication among COVID-19 infections, with limited large-scale studies evaluating outcomes associated with COVID-19-related Myocarditis. We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to compare COVID-19 patients with and without Myocarditis. A total of 1,659,040 patients were included in the study: COVID-19 with Myocarditis (n = 6,455, 0.4%) and COVID-19 without Myocarditis (n = 1,652,585, 99.6%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, sudden cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, length of stay, health care utilization costs, and disposition. We conducted a secondary analysis with propensity matching to confirm results obtained by traditional multivariate analysis. COVID-19 patients with Myocarditis had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to COVID-19 patients without Myocarditis (30.5% vs. 13.1%, adjusted OR: 3 [95% CI 2.1-4.2], p < 0.001). This cohort also had significantly increased cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, sudden cardiac death, required more mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support and higher hospitalization cost. Vaccination and more research for treatment strategies will be critical for reducing worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related Myocarditis.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Inpatients , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Myocarditis/therapy , Myocarditis/complications , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Retrospective Studies
16.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(12): ofac326, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36536667

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus have been available since December 2020. Vaccination rates among hospitalized patients at our institution remained low at approximately 40%, thus we sought to understand the drivers of vaccine hesitancy in our patient population. Methods: All unvaccinated adult patients admitted to our hospital were asked to participate in a survey to assess coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy. Updated vaccination status was collected at the end of the study. Results: Ninety-seven patients agreed to participate, 34% of which were SARS-CoV-2 positive based on results from polymerase chain reaction tests. Of the 64 participants eligible to receive the vaccine, 57.8% were agreeable but only 27% received the vaccine before discharge. Conclusion: Many patients are willing to receive the vaccine, and hospitalization provides a unique opportunity to interact with patients who have been otherwise unaware, unable, or unwilling to pursue vaccination outside of the hospital.

17.
Int J Heart Fail ; 4(3): 145-153, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36262793

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are considered new cardiovascular epidemics of the last decade. Recent national trends show an uptrend in HF hospitalizations. We aimed to identify the 30-day readmission rate, causes, and impact on healthcare utilization in HF exacerbation with a history of AF. Methods: We utilized 2018 Nationwide readmission data and included patients aged ≥18 years with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code indicating HF exacerbation and AF were included in the study. Primary outcome is 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were mortality rates, common causes of readmission, and healthcare utilization. Independent predictors for readmission were identified using cox regression analysis. Results: The total number of admissions in our study was 48,250. The mean age was 77.8 years (standard deviation, 12.1), and 47.74% were females. The 30-day readmission rate was 16.72%. The mortality rate at index admission and readmission was 7.28% and 8.12%, respectively. The most common cause of readmission was the hypertensive heart and kidney disease with HF. The independent predictors of readmission were low socio-economic class, Medicaid, Charlson comorbidities score. The financial burden on healthcare for all the readmission was $461 million for the year 2018. Conclusions: The 30-day readmission rate was 16.72%. The mortality rate increased from 7.28% to 8.12% with readmission. The financial burden for readmission during that year was $461 million. Future studies directed with interventions to prevents readmissions are warranted.

18.
Cureus ; 14(5): e24782, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35673321

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the United States has steadily increased over the past few decades. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) are among the most common chronic and acute complications of DM. Guidance on the management of DKA in ESKD is limited by lack of evidence. We investigated the in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized for DKA with underlying ESKD.  Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study and utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2018. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) codes were used to identify adults (>18 yrs) diagnosed with DM and ESKD. We compared patients with DKA and ESKD to patients who had DKA with preserved renal function. The primary outcomes were rates of in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation.  Results:Out of 538,135 patients, 18,685 (3.74%) represented DKA patients with ESKD, and 519,450 (96.53%) represented DKA patients with preserved renal function. DKA with concomitant ESKD was more prevalent in a relatively older population (age>30 yrs) with female predominance (52.4%) (p<0.001). The mean age of males and females in the ESKD group was 46.2 (SD 12.7) and 43.7 (SD 13.6) years respectively. African American race and low socioeconomic status had a higher burden of ESKD. In-hospital mortality rate (adjusted OR= 1.12, p=0.56) and need for mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR= 1.11, p=0.25) did not differ significantly in the two groups but adjusted mean total hospitalization charge ($14,882) and mean length of stay (0.87) at the hospital were significantly higher in patients with DKA and ESRD than in those with preserved renal function. CONCLUSION: DKA is associated with short-term morbidity, increased length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. There is a dearth of evidence-based guidance regarding DKA management in CKD and ESRD. Further studies looking into measures in the management of DKA in ESRD will help develop guidelines in management, decreasing morbidity, and cost of hospitalization.

19.
Cureus ; 14(2): e22090, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35165645

ABSTRACT

Objective About 41 million people aged ≥18 years reported lifetime use of cocaine, and 5.4 million people reported having used cocaine in 2019. We aim to identify trends of cocaine use, manifestations, concomitant drug use, and financial burden on health care among hospitalized patients. Methods We utilized National Inpatient Sample from years 2006-2018. Patients with age ≥18 years, admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of cocaine abuse, dependence, poisoning, or unspecified cocaine use were included in the study. We used ICD-9 Clinical Modification (CM) and ICD-10-CM codes to retrieve patient samples and comorbid conditions. The primary outcome was the trend in cocaine use among hospitalized patients from the year 2006 to 2018. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess the significance of trends. Results In the year 2006, the prevalence of cocaine abuse among hospitalized patients was 10,751 per million with an initial decline to 7,451 per million in 2012 and a subsequent increase to 11,891 per million hospitalized patients in 2018 with p =0.01. The majority of patients admitted were older than 50 years (43.27%), and a greater percentage of patients were males. All ethnicities showed a rising trend in the use of cocaine except for Native Americans. Cardiovascular effects, neuropsychiatric and infectious manifestations in hospitalized patients with cocaine abuse showed a consistent increase from year 2006 to 2018 with p <0.001. Conclusions There is a recent uptrend in cocaine use among hospital admissions in the US from 2006 to 2018 with an increased rate of systemic manifestations. This highlights the impact of cocaine use on the health system and the dire need to address this growing problem.

20.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(2): e0636, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35187498

ABSTRACT

The majority of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients develop acute kidney injury, and 40-60% require renal replacement therapy. This study aimed to examine determinants of major adverse kidney events in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. PATIENTS: Patients admitted at Barnes Jewish hospital between 2008 and 2017 and requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients 18 years old and older who survived to hospital discharge were considered for the study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients who were admitted to a single center between 2008 and 2017, were on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for more than 24 hours and survived hospital discharge were included. Major adverse kidney event was defined as either doubling serum creatinine, incident end-stage renal disease, or death. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 2-3. Complete acute kidney injury recovery was defined as a return to 50% of baseline serum creatinine and partial recovery as an improvement in acute kidney injury stage without a return to 50% of baseline serum creatinine. Survival analysis plots and Cox regression models were fitted to examine the associations of acute kidney injury status, acute kidney injury recovery, and other factors with major adverse kidney event. Among 188 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who survived until hospital discharge, 63% had acute kidney injury and 41% required renal replacement therapy. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with no/partial recovery from acute kidney injury had a higher rate of major adverse kidney event compared with those with no acute kidney injury. Multivariate analysis showed that acute kidney injury (adjusted hazard ratio =1.79 [95% CI = 1.00-3.21]), no/partial recovery from acute kidney injury (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.94 [95% CI = 1.46-5.92]), and initiation of renal replacement therapy on the day or after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (adjusted hazard ratio = 5.4 [95% CI = 1.14-25.6]) were significant determinants of major adverse kidney event after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Acute kidney injury, acute kidney injury recovery status, and timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy are determinants of major adverse kidney events in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...