Evaluation of optimum classification measures used to define textbook outcome among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure reflecting various aspects of services provided to patients with solid malignancies. We sought to evaluate the importance of various TO components previously proposed for gastric cancer. METHODS: Prospectively maintained electronic databases of 1,743 patients treated in two academic surgical centres were reviewed. Six candidate definitions of TO were evaluated based on their ability to accurately predict patients' prognosis by Cox proportional hazards modelling. RESULTS: TO definition combining 10 measures corresponding to complete tumour resection with an uneventful postoperative course showed the best goodness of fit by achieving the lowest values of Akaike (AIC) and Bayesian (BIC) information criteria and the best predictive performance based on the highest value of c-index. The overall median survival was significantly longer for patients with than without textbook outcome (69.0 vs 20.1 months, P < 0.001). TO maintained its prognostic value in a multivariate model controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, treatment, and tumour related variables and was associated with a 39% lower risk of death (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.51 - 0.73, P < 0.001). Nine variables identified as predictors of TO were used to develop a nomogram showing very good correlation between the predicted and actual probability of achieving TO. The AUC of ROC obtained from the nomogram was 0.752 (95% CI 0.727 to 0.781). CONCLUSIONS: A uniform definition of textbook outcome provides clinically relevant prognostic information and could be used in quality improvement programs for gastric cancer patients.

Nomogram-Based Prognostic Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Patients with Low Counts of Examined Lymph Nodes Outperforms the Predictive Ability of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has limited accuracy in predicting survival of gastric cancer patients with inadequate counts of evaluated lymph nodes (LNs). We therefore aimed to develop a prognostic nomogram suitable for clinical applications in such cases. METHODS: A total of 1511 noncardia gastric cancer patients treated between 1990 and 2010 in the academic surgical center were reviewed to compare the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system. A nomogram was developed for the prediction of 5-year survival in patients with less than 16 LNs evaluated (n = 546). External validation was performed using datasets derived from the Polish Gastric Cancer Study Group (n = 668) and the SEER database (n = 11,225). RESULTS: The 8th edition of AJCC staging showed better overall discriminatory power compared to the previous version, but no improvement was found for patients with < 16 evaluated LNs. The developed nomogram had better concordance index (0.695) than the former (0.682) or latest (0.680) staging editions, including patients subject to neoadjuvant treatment, and calibration curves showed excellent agreement between the nomogram-predicted and actual survival. High discriminatory power was also demonstrated for both validation cohorts. Subsequently, the nomogram showed the best accuracy for the prediction of 5-year survival through the time-dependent ROC curve analysis in the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant nomogram was built for the prediction of 5-year survival in patients with inadequate numbers of LNs evaluated in surgical specimens. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was validated in two Western populations.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin compared with surgery alone in the treatment of gastric cancer: a phase III randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide, Adriamycin and cisplatin (EAP) after potentially curative resections for gastric cancer. METHODS: After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to the EAP or control arm. Chemotherapy included 3 courses, administered every 28 days. Each cycle consisted of doxorubicin (20 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 7, cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) on days 2 and 8, and etoposide (120 mg/m(2)) on days 4, 5, and 6. RESULTS: Of 309 eligible patients, 141 were allocated to chemotherapy and 154 to the supportive care group. Four (2.8%) treatment-related deaths were recorded, including 3 due to septic complications of myelosuppression and 1 due to cardiocirculatory failure. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were found in 17 (22%) patients. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the median survival was 41.3 months (95% confidence interval, 24.5-58.2) and 35.9 months (95% confidence interval, 25.5-46.3) in the chemotherapy and control group, respectively (p = 0.398). Subgroup analysis revealed survival benefit from chemotherapy in patients with tumors infiltrating the serosa and in those with 7-15 metastatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Three cycles of EAP regimen postoperatively offer no survival advantage in gastric cancer patients.