Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 70: 110164, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33485109

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Explore how the introduction of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) protocols for reversing anticoagulation and the treatment of critical bleeding influenced blood product utilization. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the utilization rate of plasma and 4F-PCC from September 2012 through December 2018. SETTING: Blood bank and pharmacy records of a single large tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Admitted patients except obstetric during the study period (n = 283,319). INTERVENTION: Five institutional protocols providing guidelines for 4F-PCC administration were deployed over a 3-year period. MEASUREMENTS: The utilization rate of plasma and 4F-PCC was the primary outcome and analyzed using an interrupted time series analysis. Utilization of platelets and cryoprecipitate as well as the impact of the intervention on the service prescribing the blood products were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Data were evaluated using a segmented time series regression. RESULTS: When adjusted for seasonality, the monthly rate of plasma administration was 24.7 ± 2.0 units per 100 admissions in the 6-month period prior to the 1st intervention (May-October 2013) and decreased to 9.9 ± 2.2 units per 100 admissions in the same six-month period following the 5th intervention (May-October 2018), median difference - 14.5, 95% CI -16.0 to -13.2, P < 0.001. During the 6-month period prior to the 1st intervention (May-October 2013) the monthly rate of 4-F PCC use was 1.2 ± 0.8 doses per 1000 admissions and increased to 2.8 ± 1.0 doses per 1000 admissions 6-months following the 5th intervention (May-October 2018), median difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.9, P = 0.014. The monthly utilization of platelets was decreased and cryoprecipitate slightly increased following the implementation of the PCC protocols. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings demonstrate that establishing institutional protocols for the use of 4F-PCC to reverse the effects of anticoagulation and to treat critical bleeding with associated coagulopathy was associated with reduced plasma utilization.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factors , Hemorrhage , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
2.
Transfusion ; 60(9): 1919-1923, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The acute respiratory illness designated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and caused a worldwide pandemic. Concerns arose about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donations and potential significant blood transfusion needs in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Data on blood usage in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are scarce. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of blood component transfusions in the first 4 weeks of COVID-19 ward admissions. The study period began 14 days before the first COVID-19 cohort wards opened in our hospital in March 2020 and ended 28 days afterward. The number of patients and blood components transfused in the COVID-19 wards was tabulated. Transfusion rates of each blood component were compared in COVID-19 wards versus all other inpatient wards. RESULTS: COVID-19 wards opened with seven suspected patients and after 4 weeks had 305 cumulative COVID-19 admissions. Forty-one of 305 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (13.4%) received transfusions with 11.1% receiving red blood cells (RBCs), 1.6% platelets (PLTs), 1.0% plasma, and 1.0% cryoprecipitate (cryo). COVID-19 wards had significantly lower transfusion rates compared to non-COVID wards for RBCs (0.03 vs 0.08 units/patient-day), PLTs (0.003 vs 0.033), and plasma (0.002 vs 0.018; all p < 0.0001). Cryo rates were similar (0.008 vs 0.009, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients required many fewer blood transfusions than other hospitalized patients. COVID-19 transfusion data will inform planning and preparation of blood resource utilization during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/therapy , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Appointments and Schedules , Blood Component Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/complications , Chicago , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/etiology , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/therapy , Elective Surgical Procedures , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Departments , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...