ABSTRACT
To study home uroflowmetry and to compare this method to free or "traditional" uroflowmetry in the evaluation of the patient with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and the relationship between the values of home uroflowmetry parameters and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Twenty-five patients (mean age, 67 years) with symptomatic BPH were examined with home uroflowmetry, free uroflowmetry, and pressure-flow measurement. The patients were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom score; digital rectal examination; routine blood chemistry, including serum prostate-specific antigen level; urinanalysis; transrectal ultrasonography; and post-void residual urine. The 24 hr were divided into "active time" (AT) and "sleep time" (ST). AT home uroflowmetry parameters were compared to ST ones. The home uroflowmetry parameters were compared to respective ones of the free uroflowmetry as well and those obtained by pressure-flow measurement. The patients were asked about their opinion of home uroflowmetry. Home uroflowmetry was found to be a simpler and more acceptable method than free uroflowmetry. The mean Qmax of AT was significantly greater than the mean Qmax of ST, but the mean voided volume and mean voiding time of ST were significantly larger than those of AT. There was a close relationship between the mean Qmax at home and the Qmax in hospital, but the voided volume and voiding time measured in hospital were significantly larger than those at home. Home uroflowmetry provided an estimation of BOO for 46% of the patients as low if the home mean Qmax was >14 ml/sec, and as high if the home mean Qmax was <10 ml/sec. Home uroflowmetry was well accepted by the patients and gave more information than free uroflowmetry. In 46% of the cases, an estimation of BOO was obtained with home uroflowmetry.
